Microbial Bioactives

Microbial Bioactives | Online ISSN 2209-2161
295
Citations
184.6k
Views
157
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
REVIEWS   (Open Access)

Harnessing Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture: Integrating Ecological Complexity, Microbial Function, and Translational Insights

Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Materials and Methods 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Limitations 6. Conclusion References

Bulbul Shaikat 1, Tahsin Bin Rabbani 1, Salaman Ahamad 2

+ Author Affiliations

Microbial Bioactives 9 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/microbbioacts.9110616

Submitted: 11 December 2025 Revised: 05 February 2026  Accepted: 14 February 2026  Published: 16 February 2026 


Abstract

Global food security faces unprecedented challenges, with the world population projected to surpass 9.8 billion by 2050, necessitating a 70% increase in agricultural productivity. Plants, as sessile organisms, constantly confront biotic and abiotic stressors, including pathogens, drought, salinity, and the effects of climate change. These stressors can reduce yield, disrupt hormonal signaling, and enhance susceptibility to diseases such as Fusarium head blight, which drastically impacts crop quality. Traditional reliance on synthetic chemicals for crop protection is increasingly limited by environmental concerns, fungicide resistance, and regulatory constraints, highlighting the urgent need for sustainable alternatives. Plant Microbiome Management has emerged as a promising strategy, leveraging the complex microbial communities associated with plants, often termed the “second genome.” These communities, particularly in the rhizosphere, comprise diverse bacteria, fungi, archaea, viruses, and protists, whose interactions influence plant growth, disease resistance, and nutrient acquisition. Microbiome engineering, including the use of biocontrol agents (BCAs) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs), offers environmentally friendly disease suppression through competition, antibiosis, and induction of systemic resistance. Advances in omics technologies and synthetic microbial community design accelerate the identification of effective microbial consortia. However, translating laboratory success into consistent field performance remains a challenge due to abiotic constraints, microbial competition, and molecular complexity. This review systematically synthesizes current knowledge on plant–microbe interactions, ecological dynamics, and practical applications, providing insights for sustainable crop production strategies that harness the full potential of plant-associated microbiomes.

Keywords: Plant microbiome, rhizosphere, biocontrol agents, PGPR, microbiome engineering, sustainable agriculture, plant–microbe interactions, omics technologies

References

Afridi, M. S., Ali, S., Salam, A., Terra, W. C., Hafeez, A., Ali, B. S., AlTami, M. S., Ameen, F., Ercisli, S., et al. (2022). Plant microbiome engineering: Hopes or hypes. Biology, 11(12), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121782

Ahmad, N. B., Jaafaru, M. S., Isa, Z., Abdulhamid, Y., Kakudi, R. A., Ugya, A. Y., et al. (2024). High pollution loads engineer oxygen dynamics, ecological niches, and pathogenicity shifts in freshwater environments. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 14, 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100425

Alahmad, A., Harir, M., Fochesato, S., Tulumello, J., Walker, A., Barakat, M., et al. (2024). Unraveling the interplay between root exudates, microbiota, and rhizosheath formation in pearl millet. Microbiome, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01727-3

Al-Khayri, J. M., Rashmi, R., Toppo, V., Chole, P. B., Banadka, A., et al. (2023). Plant secondary metabolites: The weapons for biotic stress management. Metabolites, 13, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13060716

Allard, S., Gutierrez, L., Fontaine, C., Croué, J. P., & Gallard, H. (2017). Organic matter interactions with natural manganese oxide and synthetic birnessite. Science of the Total Environment, 583, 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.120

Allison, S. D., Chacon, S. S., & German, D. P. (2014). Substrate concentration constraints on microbial decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 79, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.08.021

Alster, C. J., Weller, Z. D., & von Fischer, J. C. (2018). A meta-analysis of temperature sensitivity as a microbial trait. Global Change Biology, 24, 4211–4224. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14342

Amin, R. B., Setu, S. N., Mia, R. (2025). Advances in CAR T-Cell Engineering and Redirected Immune Effector Cells for Enhanced Solid Tumor Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review, Journal of Precision Biosciences, 7(1), 1-8, 10540. https://doi.org/10.25163/biosciences.7110540

Aplakidou, E., Vergoulidis, N., Chasapi, M., Venetsianou, N. K., Kokoli, M., et al. (2024). Visualizing metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data: A comprehensive review. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 23, 2011–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.060

Astapati, A. D., & Nath, S. (2023). The complex interplay between plant-microbe and virus interactions in sustainable agriculture: Harnessing phytomicrobiomes for enhanced soil health, designer plants, resource use efficiency, and food security. Crop Design, 2, 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropd.2023.100028

Bai, X., Li, Y., Jing, X., Zhao, X., & Zhao, P. (2023). Response mechanisms of bacterial communities and nitrogen cycle functional genes in millet rhizosphere soil to chromium stress. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1116535

Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006). The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57, 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159

Bakker, P. A. H. M., Doornbos, R. F., Wintermans, P. C., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2018). The soil-borne legacy. Cell, 172, 1178–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.024

Barreiro, A., & Díaz-Raviña, M. (2021). Fire impacts on soil microorganisms: Mass, activity, and diversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 22, 100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100264

Barrera-Galicia, G. C., Peniche-Pavía, H. A., Peña-Cabriales, J. J., Covarrubias, S. A., Vera-Núñez, J. A., & Délano-Frier, J. P. (2021). Metabolic footprints of Burkholderia sensu lato rhizosphere bacteria active against maize Fusarium pathogens. Microorganisms, 9, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102061

Bedano, J. C., Vaquero, F., Domínguez, A., Rodríguez, M. P., Wall, L., & Lavelle, P. (2019). Earthworms contribute to ecosystem processes in no-till systems with high crop rotation intensity in Argentina. Acta Oecologica, 98, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2019.05.003

Bender, G., Pierce, E., Hill, J. A., Darty, J. E., & Ragsdale, S. W. (2014). NIH public access. Microbiological Research, 3, 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1mt00042j

Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012). The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science, 17, 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001

Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2018). Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. ISME Journal, 12, 1496–1507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0093-1

Berg, G., Rybakova, D., Fischer, D., Cernava, T., Champomier Vergès, M.-C., Charles, T., et al. (2020). Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Environmental Microbiome, 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0

Bhardwaj, G., Cameotra, S. S., & Chopra, H. K. (2013). Biosurfactants from fungi: A review. Journal of Petroleum & Environmental Biotechnology, 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7463.1000160

Bian, Y., Ci, Q., Luo, X. M., & Zhang, C. (2025). Precision adjuvant strategies in vaccine development for substance use disorders: Variability and mechanistic insights. Pharmaceutics, 17(9), 1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17091223

Bilal, S., Khan, A. L., Shahzad, R., Asaf, S., Kang, S. M., & Lee, I. J. (2017). Endophytic Paecilomyces formosus LHL10 augments Glycine max L. adaptation to Ni-contamination through affecting endogenous phytohormones and oxidative stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00870

Bilal, S., Shahzad, R., & Lee, I. J. (2021). Synergistic interaction of fungal endophytes Paecilomyces formosus LHL10 and Penicillium funiculosum LHL06 in alleviating multi-metal toxicity stress in Glycine max L. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 67429–67444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15202-9

Blagodatskaya, E., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2008). Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: Critical review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0334-y

Blankinship, J. C., Niklaus, P. A., & Hungate, B. A. (2011). A meta-analysis of responses of soil biota to global change. Oecologia, 165, 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1909-0

Blois, J. L., Zarnetske, P. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C., & Finnegan, S. (2013). Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science, 341, 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237184

Blume, E., Bischoff, M., Reichert, J. M., Moorman, T., Konopka, A., & Turco, R. F. (2002). Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Applied Soil Ecology, 20, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00025-2

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Deryabin, D., Galadzhieva, A., Kosyan, D., & Duskaev, G. (2019). Plant-derived inhibitors of AHL-mediated quorum sensing in bacteria: Modes of action. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(22), 5588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225588

Dutilloy, E., Oni, F. E., Esmaeel, Q., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2022). Plant beneficial bacteria as bioprotectants against wheat and barley diseases. Journal of Fungi, 8(6), 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060632

Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Egorova, D. A., Voronina, O. L., Solovyev, A. I., Kunda, M. S., Aksenova, E. I., Ryzhova, N. N., Danilova, K. V., Rykova, V. S., Scherbakova, A. A., Semenov, A. N., Polyakov, N. B., Grumov, D. A., Shevlyagina, N. V., Dolzhikova, I. V., Romanova, Y. M., & Gintsburg, A. L. (2020). Integrated into environmental biofilm Chromobacterium vaccinii survives winter with support of bacterial community. Microorganisms, 8(11), 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111696

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane. http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Jannati, S., Patel, A., Patnaik, R., & Banerjee, Y. (2025). Oleocanthal as a multifunctional anti-cancer agent: mechanistic insights, advanced delivery strategies, and synergies for precision oncology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(12), 5521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125521

Jannati, S., Patel, A., Patnaik, R., & Banerjee, Y. (2025). Oleocanthal as a multifunctional anti-cancer agent: Mechanistic insights, advanced delivery strategies, and synergies for precision oncology. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(12), 5521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125521

Lahlali, R., Ezrari, S., Radouane, N., Kenfaoui, J., Esmaeel, Q., El Hamss, H., Belabess, Z., & Barka, E. A. (2022). Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms, 10(3), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030596

Lastochkina, O., Seifikalhor, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Baymiev, A., Pusenkova, L., Garipova, S., Kulabuhova, D., & Maksimov, I. (2019). Bacillus spp.: Efficient biotic strategy to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Plants, 8(4), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8040097

Lyakhovchenko, N. S., Abashina, T. N., Polivtseva, V. N., Senchenkov, V. Y., Pribylov, D. A., Chepurina, A. A., Nikishin, I. A., Avakova, A. A., Goyanov, M. A., Gubina, E. D., Churikova, D. A., Sirotin, A. A., Suzina, N. E., & Solyanikova, I. P. (2021). A blue-purple pigment-producing bacterium isolated from the Vezelka River in the city of Belgorod. Microorganisms, 9(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010102

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palmieri, D., Ianiri, G., Del Grosso, C., Barone, G., De Curtis, F., Castoria, R., & Lima, G. (2022). Advances and perspectives in the use of biocontrol agents against fungal plant diseases. Horticulturae, 8(7), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070577

Rana, K., & Sharma, P. (2021). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their interactions with host plants. Plant Science Today, 8(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1543

Rosenberg, K., Dickler, C., Kreuzer, K., Müller, J. L., Eberius, C. U., Scheu, S., & Bonkowski, M. (2010). Soil bacteria and protozoa affect root branching via effects on the auxin and cytokinin balance in plants. Plant and Soil, 328(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0101-3

Setu, S. N., Amin, R. B., & Mia, R. (2025). Benchmarking the Omics Revolution: A Comprehensive Review of Methodological Consistency and Clinical Readiness. Journal of Precision Biosciences, 7(1), 1-11.  https://doi.org/10.25163/biosciences.7110539               

Sokol, N. W., Slessarev, E., Marschmann, G. L., Nicolas, A., Blazewicz, S. J., Brodie, E. L., Firestone, M. K., Foley, M. M., Hestrin, R., & Hungate, B. A. (2022). Life and death in the soil microbiome: How ecological processes influence biogeochemistry. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 20(7), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00695-z

Soto-López, J. D., Fernández-Soto, P., & Muro, A. (2025). Bacterial composition across bat species: A human health perspective. Animals, 15(21), 3126. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213126

Syafiuddin, A., Salmiati, Hadibarata, T., Kueh, A. B. H., & Salim, M. R. (2018). Novel weed-extracted silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial appraisal against a rare bacterium from river and sewage treatment plan. Nanomaterials, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8010009

Timmusk, S., Nevo, E., Ayele, F., Noe, S., & Niinemets, Ü. (2020). Fighting Fusarium pathogens in the era of climate change: A conceptual approach. Pathogens, 9(6), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9060419

Valenzuela Ruiz, V., Cervantes Enriquez, E. P., Vázquez Ramírez, M. F., Bivian Hernández, M. d. l. Á., Cárdenas Manríquez, M., Parra Cota, F. I., & de los Santos Villalobos, S. (2025). A new era in the discovery of biological control bacteria: Omics-driven bioprospecting. Soil Systems, 9(4), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems9040108