Business and Social Sciences

Business and social sciences | Online ISSN 3067-8919
89
Citations
134.3k
Views
49
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
RESEARCH ARTICLE   (Open Access)

Intelligent Scheduling Systems and Healthcare Workforce Efficiency: A Survey-Based Study of 155 U.S. Healthcare Professionals

Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Materials and Methods 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion Acknowledgement Author Contribution Competing Financial Interests References

Mithra Rani Hur 1*

+ Author Affiliations

Business and Social Sciences 2 (1) 1-9 https://doi.org/10.25163/business.2110874

Submitted: 30 September 2024 Revised: 06 December 2024  Accepted: 11 December 2024  Published: 14 December 2024 


Abstract

Background: Healthcare organizations depend on effective workforce scheduling to sustain quality care, yet conventional scheduling approaches frequently produce uneven workloads, administrative strain, and diminished staff morale. Whether intelligent, algorithm-driven scheduling systems meaningfully address these problems remains only partially understood.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to 155 U.S. healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, allied health professionals, and administrative staff. A structured questionnaire using five-point Likert-scale items assessed Intelligent Scheduling Accuracy (ISA), User Satisfaction (US), Ease of Use (EOU), System Reliability (SR), and Healthcare Workforce Efficiency (HWE). Data were analyzed in SPSS (version 26) using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression.

Results: All constructs were rated favorably, with mean scores ranging from 4.05 to 4.21. HWE showed the strongest correlation with ISA (r = 0.703), followed by US (r = 0.681), EOU (r = 0.642), and SR (r = 0.617). Internal consistency was strong across constructs (Cronbach’s α = 0.873–0.915), and the regression model explained 61.0% of the variance in workforce efficiency (R² = 0.610, F = 58.74, p < .001), with ISA emerging as the strongest individual predictor (β = 0.341).

Conclusion: Intelligent scheduling systems appear to be positively associated with healthcare workforce efficiency, largely through the combined influence of scheduling accuracy, usability, and reliability. These findings, while preliminary, offer empirical support for continued investment in intelligent scheduling technologies within U.S. healthcare settings.

Keywords: intelligent scheduling systems; healthcare workforce efficiency; user satisfaction; system reliability; healthcare workforce management

References

Ahmadi-Assalemi, G., Al-Khateeb, H., Maple, C., Epiphaniou, G., Alhaboby, Z. A., Alkaabi, S., & Alhaboby, D. (2020). Digital twins for precision healthcare. In Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications (pp. 133–158). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_8

Ala, A., & Chen, F. (2022). Appointment scheduling problem in complexity systems of the healthcare services: A comprehensive review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5819813

Ala, A., Alsaadi, F. E., Ahmadi, M., & Mirjalili, S. (2021). Optimization of an appointment scheduling problem for healthcare systems based on the quality of fairness service using whale optimization algorithm and NSGA-II. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 19816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98851-7

Albahri, O. S., Albahri, A. S., Mohammed, K. I., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Hashim, M., & Salman, O. H. (2018). Systematic review of real-time remote health monitoring system in triage and priority-based sensor technology: Taxonomy, open challenges, motivation and recommendations. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(5), 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0943-4

Ammendolia, C., Côté, P., Cancelliere, C., Cassidy, J. D., Hartvigsen, J., Boyle, E., Soklaridis, S., Stern, P., & Amick, B. (2016). Healthy and productive workers: Using intervention mapping to design a workplace health promotion and wellness program to improve presenteeism. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3843-x

Beheshti, H. M., & Beheshti, C. M. (2010). Improving productivity and firm performance with enterprise resource planning. Enterprise Information Systems, 4(4), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2010.511276

Demirkan, H., & Spohrer, J. (2014). Developing a framework to improve virtual shopping in digital malls with intelligent self-service systems. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 860–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.012

Devaraj, S., Ow, T. T., & Kohli, R. (2013). Examining the impact of information technology and patient flow on healthcare performance: A theory of swift and even flow (TSEF) perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 31(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.03.001

Dogru, A. K., & Keskin, B. B. (2020). AI in operations management: Applications, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Data Information and Management, 2(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-020-00023-1

Espinosa, Á. V., Ruiz, J. L. L., Mata, F. M., & Estevez, M. E. (2021). Application of IoT in healthcare: Keys to implementation of the sustainable development goals. Sensors, 21(7), 2330. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072330

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Foresti, R., Rossi, S., Magnani, M., Lo Bianco, C. G., & Delmonte, N. (2020). Smart society and artificial intelligence: Big data scheduling and the global standard method applied to smart maintenance. Engineering, 6(7), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.11.014

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Fox, K. E., Johnson, S. T., Berkman, L. F., Sianoja, M., Soh, Y., Kubzansky, L. D., & Kelly, E. L. (2021). Organisational- and group-level workplace interventions and their effect on multiple domains of worker well-being: A systematic review. Work & Stress, 36(1), 30–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1969476

Fragapane, G., Ivanov, D., Peron, M., Sgarbossa, F., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2020). Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03526-7

Holden, R. J., Carayon, P., Gurses, A. P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A. S., Ozok, A. A., & Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J. (2013). SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics, 56(11), 1669–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.838643

Kaluarachchi, Y. (2020). Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0136-y

Klumpp, M., Hintze, M., Immonen, M., Ródenas-Rigla, F., Pilati, F., Aparicio-Martínez, F., Çelebi, D., Liebig, T., Jirstrand, M., Urbann, O., Hedman, M., Lipponen, J. A., Bicciato, S., Radan, A., Valdivieso, B., Thronicke, W., Gunopulos, D., & Delgado-Gonzalo, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence for hospital health care: Application cases and answers to challenges in European hospitals. Healthcare, 9(8), 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080961

Ma, X., Wang, Z., Zhou, S., Wen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Intelligent healthcare systems assisted by data analytics and mobile computing. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3928080

Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2022). A literature review of the challenges and opportunities of the transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0. Energies, 15(17), 6276. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176276

Muthuri, R. N. D. K., Senkubuge, F., & Hongoro, C. (2020). Determinants of motivation among healthcare workers in the East African community between 2009–2019: A systematic review. Healthcare, 8(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020164

Oueida, S., Aloqaily, M., & Ionescu, S. (2018). A smart healthcare reward model for resource allocation in smart city. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(17), 24573–24594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6647-4

Oueida, S., Kotb, Y., Aloqaily, M., Jararweh, Y., & Baker, T. (2018). An edge computing based smart healthcare framework for resource management. Sensors, 18(12), 4307. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124307

Persis, D. J., S, A., M, V. S., G, R., Sreedharan, V. R., & Saikouk, T. (2020). Improving patient care at a multi-speciality hospital using lean six sigma. Production Planning & Control, 33(12), 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1852623

Rafiq, M., Zhang, X., Yuan, J., Naz, S., & Maqbool, S. (2020). Impact of a balanced scorecard as a strategic management system tool to improve sustainable development: Measuring the mediation of organizational performance through PLS-Smart. Sustainability, 12(4), 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041365

Schepens, H. R. M. M., Van Puyenbroeck, J., & Maes, B. (2018). How to improve the quality of life of elderly people with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review of support strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(3), 483–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12559

Subrahmanya, S. V. G., Shetty, D. K., Patil, V., Hameed, B. M. Z., Paul, R., Smriti, K., Naik, N., & Somani, B. K. (2021). The role of data science in healthcare advancements: Applications, benefits, and future prospects. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191(4), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02730-z

Tursunbayeva, A. (2019). Human resource technology disruptions and their implications for human resources management in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4068-3

Van Leeuwen, K. G., De Rooij, M., Schalekamp, S., Van Ginneken, B., & Rutten, M. J. C. M. (2021). How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes? Pediatric Radiology, 52(11), 2087–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05114-8

Zhai, Y., Li, R., & Yan, Z. (2022). Research on application of meticulous nursing scheduling management based on data-driven intelligent optimization technology. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3293806

Zhou, D., Xu, K., Lv, Z., Yang, J., Li, M., He, F., & Xu, G. (2022). Intelligent manufacturing technology in the steel industry of China: A review. Sensors, 22(21), 8194. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218194


Article metrics
View details
1
Downloads
0
Citations
13
Views
📖 Cite article

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



1
Save
0
Citation
13
View
0
Share