Microbial Bioactives

Microbial Bioactives | Online ISSN 2209-2161
380
Citations
257k
Views
185
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
REVIEWS   (Open Access)

Systematic Review and Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Antimicrobial Efficacy, Target Binding, and Resistance Profiles of iChip-Derived Compounds, Including Teixobactin and Its Analogs

Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. New Structural Templates for Antimicrobials: Revitalizing the Discovery Pipeline 4. Results 5. Discussion 6. Limitations 7. Conclusion Author Contributions Acknowledgements References

Maryam Zafar 1*, Faiz un-Nisa 2, Bheesham Kingrani 3, Md. Sajib Hossain Suvo 4 

+ Author Affiliations

Microbial Bioactives 9 (1) 1-17 https://doi.org/10.25163/microbbioacts.9110743

Submitted: 26 March 2026 Revised: 21 May 2026  Accepted: 29 May 2026  Published: 31 May 2026 


Abstract

The accelerating crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has, in recent years, forced a reconsideration of how antibiotics are discovered, optimized, and ultimately deployed. Within this shifting landscape, iChip technology—by enabling access to previously unculturable microorganisms—has emerged as a quietly transformative tool. This systematic review and quantitative comparative synthesis attempts to bring some coherence to an otherwise fragmented body of literature surrounding iChip-derived antibiotics, particularly teixobactin and its analogues. Sixteen studies were systematically identified and analyzed under the PRISMA 2020 framework, integrating antimicrobial activity (MIC), target-binding interactions, resistance dynamics, and translational outcomes. The findings, perhaps unsurprisingly yet still striking, confirm that teixobactin maintains exceptional potency against Gram-positive pathogens, often at sub-microgram levels. And yet, the story does not remain so straightforward. Synthetic analogues—while more accessible—frequently display reduced efficacy, suggesting a delicate dependence on structural precision. More intriguingly, the relationship between binding affinity and antimicrobial activity appears inconsistent, hinting that efficacy extends beyond simple target engagement. Resistance, long considered negligible, emerges instead as a low-probability but tangible outcome, often mediated through tolerance pathways rather than direct mutation. Taken together, these results suggest that iChip-derived antibiotics represent not a definitive solution, but rather an evolving paradigm—one defined as much by its promise as by its complexity.

Keywords: iChip technology; Teixobactin; Antimicrobial resistance; Lipid II binding; Antibiotic discovery; Structure–activity relationship; Resistance tolerance

References

Amin, R. B., Setu, S. N., & Mia, R. (2025). Advances in CAR T-Cell Engineering and Redirected Immune Effector Cells for Enhanced Solid Tumor Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review. Journal of Precision Biosciences, 7(1), 1–8, 10540. https://doi.org/10.25163/biosciences.7110540

Berdy, B., Spoering, A. L., Ling, L. L., & Epstein, S. S. (2017). In situ cultivation of previously uncultivable microorganisms using the ichip. Nature Protocols, 12(10), 2232–2242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.074

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Brüssow, H. (2024). The antibiotic resistance crisis and the development of new antibiotics. Microbial Biotechnology, 17(7), e14510. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14510

Cardona, S. T., Rahman, A. S. M. Z., & Nechcoff, J. N. (2025). Innovative perspectives on the discovery of small molecule antibiotics. Nature Reviews Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-025-00089-0

Chiorean, S., Antwi, I., Carney, D. W., Kotsogianni, I., Giltrap, A. M., Alexander, F. M., Cochrane, S. A., Payne, R. J., Martin, N. I., Henninot, A., & Vederas, J. C. (2020). Dissecting the binding interactions of teixobactin with the bacterial cell wall precursor lipid II. ChemBioChem, 21(6), 789–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201900504

Darnell, R. L., Knottenbelt, M. K., Todd Rose, F. O., Monk, I. R., Stinear, T. P., & Cook, G. M. (2019). Genomewide profiling of the Enterococcus faecalis transcriptional response to teixobactin reveals CroRS as an essential regulator of antimicrobial tolerance. mSphere, 4(3), e00228-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00228-19

DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Geers, A. U., Buijs, Y., Strube, M. L., et al. (2022). Evaluating biosynthesis potential of unculturable microbes. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 20, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.024

Hidat, S. D., Masatu, J., Masota, N. E., Mwakalukwa, R., Malaba, P., Sempombe, J., & Mloka, D. (2026). Combining isolation chips with velvet transfer for high-throughput primary screening of antibiotic-producing soil-dwelling bacteria. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 242, 107397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2026.107397

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane. http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Homma, T., Nuxoll, A., Gandt, A. B., et al. (2016). Dual targeting of cell wall precursors by teixobactin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 60(11), 6510–6517. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01050-16

Imai, Y., Meyer, K. J., Iinishi, A., et al. (2019). A new antibiotic selectively kills Gram-negative pathogens. Nature, 576(7787), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1791-1

Iyer, A., Madder, A., & Singh, I. (2019). Teixobactins: A new class of 21st century antibiotics to combat multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Future Microbiology, 14(6), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2019-0056

Jarkhi, A., Lee, A. H. C., Sun, Z., Hu, M., Neelakantan, P., Li, X., & Zhang, C. (2022). Antimicrobial effects of L-Chg10-teixobactin against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Microorganisms, 10(6), 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061099

Klahn, P., & Brönstrup, M. (2017). New structural templates in antimicrobial research. Natural Product Reports.

Lawrence, W. S., Peel, J. E., de Winter, R., Ling, L. L., Nitti, A. G., Peoples, A. J., Shukla, R., MacGillavry, H. D., Heine, H. S., & Hensel, M. E. (2025). Teixobactin: A resistance-evading antibiotic for treating anthrax. ACS Infectious Diseases, 11(3), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00835

Lewis, K. (2020). The science of antibiotic discovery. Cell, 181(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.056

Ling, L. L., Schneider, T., Peoples, A. J., et al. (2015). A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance. Nature, 517(7535), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14098

Ling, L. L., Schneider, T., Peoples, A. J., Spoering, A. L., Engels, I., Conlon, B. P., Mueller, A., Schäberle, T. F., Hughes, D. E., Epstein, S., Jones, M., Lazarides, L., Steadman, V. A., Cohen, D. R., Felix, C. R., Fetterman, K. A., Millett, W. P., Nitti, A. G., Zullo, A. M., Chen, C., & Lewis, K. (2015). A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance. Nature, 517(7535), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14098

Lloyd, D. G., Schofield, B. J., Goddard, M. R., & Taylor, E. J. (2021). De novo resistance to Arg10-teixobactin occurs slowly and is costly. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 65(1), e01152-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01152-20

Matos de Opitz, C. L., & Sass, P. (2020). Exploring new mechanisms of antibiotic action. Future Microbiology, 15(9), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2020-0048

McCarthy, M. W. (2019). Teixobactin as a novel anti-infective. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 17(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2019.1550357

Murray, C. J., Ikuta, K. S., Sharara, F., et al. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance. The Lancet, 399(10325), 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0

Ng, V., Kuehne, S. A., & Chan, W. C. (2018a). Modified teixobactin analogues. Chemistry – A European Journal, 24, 9136–9147. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201801423

Ng, V., Kuehne, S. A., & Chan, W. C. (2018b). Rational design and synthesis of modified teixobactin analogues: In vitro antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Propionibacterium acnes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chemistry – A European Journal, 24(37), 9136–9147. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201801423

Nichols, D., Cahoon, N., Trakhtenberg, E. M., et al. (2010). Use of iChip for microbial cultivation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(8), 2445–2450. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01754-09

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Piddock, L. J. V. (2015). Teixobactin as a new antibiotic class. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 70(10), 2679–2680. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv175

Prakasam, G., Ramamoorthi, R., & Gopi, M. (2026). Teixobactin and darobactin: Dual breakthroughs in new antibiotic classes against MDR pathogens. International Journal of Life Sciences, Biotechnology and Pharma Research, 15(1), 810–818.

Qi, Y. K., Ai, H. S., Li, Y. M., & Yan, B. (2022). Teixobactin as a new antibiotic class. Journal of Peptide Science, 28(11), e3428. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.3428

Ramchuran, E. J., Somboro, A. M., Abdel Monaim, S. A. H., Amoako, D. G., Parboosing, R., Kumalo, H. M., Agrawal, N., Albericio, F., de La Torre, B. G., & Bester, L. A. (2018). In vitro antibacterial activity of teixobactin derivatives on clinically relevant bacterial isolates. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01535

Ramchuran, E. J., Somboro, A. M., Abdel Monaim, S. A. H., et al. (2018). Antibacterial activity of teixobactin derivatives. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01535

Setu, S. N., Amin, R. B., & Mia, R. (2025). Benchmarking the Omics Revolution: A Comprehensive Review of Methodological Consistency and Clinical Readiness. Journal of Precision Biosciences, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.25163/biosciences.7110539

Shukla, R., Lavore, F., Maity, S., Derks, M. G. N., Jones, C. R., Vermeulen, B. J. A., Melcrová, A., Morris, M. A., Becker, L. M., Wang, X., Kumar, R., Medeiros-Silva, J., van Beekveld, R. A. M., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Lorent, J. H., Lelli, M., Nowick, J. S., MacGillavry, H. D., Peoples, A. J., Spoering, A. L., Ling, L. L., Hughes, D. E., Roos, W. H., Breukink, E., Lewis, K., & Weingarth, M. (2022). Teixobactin kills bacteria by a two-pronged attack on the cell envelope. Nature, 608(7922), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05019-y

Shukla, R., Lavore, F., Maity, S., et al. (2022). Teixobactin mechanism of action. Nature, 608(7922), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05019-y

Shukla, R., Peoples, A. J., Ludwig, K. C., et al. (2023). Clovibactin discovery. Cell, 186(19), 4059–4073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.038

Todd Rose, F. O., Darnell, R. L., Morris, S. M., Rose, O. E., Paxie, O., Campbell, G., Cook, G. M., & Gebhard, S. (2023a). The two-component system CroRS acts as a master regulator of cell envelope homeostasis to confer antimicrobial tolerance in the bacterial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. Molecular Microbiology, 120, 408–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.15128

Todd Rose, F. O., et al. (2023b). CroRS regulatory system in teixobactin response. Molecular Microbiology.

Velkov, T., & Karas, J. A. (2020). Structure-activity relationships of teixobactin. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1459(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14282


Article metrics
View details
2
Downloads
0
Citations
9
Views
📖 Cite article

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



2
Save
0
Citation
9
View
0
Share