Biosensors and Nanotheranostics

Bionanotechnology, Drug Delivery, Therapeutics | online ISSN 3064-7789
175
Citations
113k
Views
68
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
REVIEWS   (Open Access)
+ Author Affiliations

Biosensors and Nanotheranostics 5 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/biosensors.5110971

Submitted: 12 June 2026 Revised: 02 August 2026  Accepted: 11 August 2026  Published: 13 August 2026 


Abstract

Cancer nanotheranostics promises something clinically unusual: a single intravenous construct that reports where it has gone and treats what it finds. That promise is routinely defeated within minutes of injection. The liver, through Kupffer cell phagocytosis and sinusoidal filtration, removes 90–95% of a conventional nanocarrier dose, so the tumour sees only a residual fraction of what was administered. The decisive event occurs earlier than most design frameworks assume. On contact with plasma, a nanocarrier acquires a biomolecular corona that supersedes its synthetic surface and supplies the biological identity the mononuclear phagocyte system actually reads. This review examines how that corona can be governed rather than merely resisted. We first map the physicochemical determinants — hydrodynamic size, zeta potential, grafting conformation and interfacial elasticity — that set the balance between renal loss, tumour extravasation and hepatic capture. We then compare stealth architectures: PEGylation and its accelerated blood clearance liability, zwitterionic coatings that resist fouling without antibody induction, intrinsically disordered polypeptides, biomimetic membrane cloaking, and the emerging class of deliberately tuned coronas that recruit albumin, clusterin and apolipoproteins in place of opsonins. Evidence that protein adsorption is required for, not merely tolerated by, the stealth effect reframes the whole design objective. Reported gains are substantial — phagocytosis suppressed up to 2.6-fold, half-life extended from minutes to roughly 21 hours or, with erythrocyte membranes, several days — and translate into measurable theranostic performance across MRI-, photoacoustic- and ultrasound-guided platforms. Reproducibility, corona variability between donors and species, and manufacturing control remain the binding constraints on translation.

Keywords: protein corona; stealth nanocarrier; hepatic clearance; Kupffer cell; dysopsonin; cancer nanotheranostics; PEGylation; biomimetic membrane camouflage

References

Abstiens, K., Korte, R., Mulac, D., Humpf, H. U., & Langer, K. (2019). Assembly and protein corona formation on PEG-PLA nanoparticles with varying surface charge and terminal groups. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 10, 1002–1015. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.10.101

Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008). Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 5(4), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp800051m

Baek, Y., Park, S. H., Wang, H., Chen, L., & Kashiwagi, S. (2026). Size- and charge-dependent biological barriers and clearance mechanisms of nanomedicines in vivo. ACS Nano, 20(4), 4147–4165.

Biswal, Z. T., Huang, G., Dellinger, M. T., Sumer, B. D., & Gao, J. (2026). Surface engineering and stealth strategies for inorganic nanocarriers in cancer therapy and imaging. ACS Nano Medicine, 12(2), 36847–36860.

Cedervall, T., Lynch, I., Lindman, S., Berggård, T., Thulin, E., Nilsson, H., Dawson, K. A., & Linse, S. (2007). Understanding the nanoparticle–protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(7), 2050–2055. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608582104

Chinen, A. B., Guan, C. M., Ko, C. H., & Mirkin, C. A. (2017). The impact of protein corona formation on the macrophage cellular uptake and biodistribution of spherical nucleic acids. Small, 13(10), 1603847. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201603847

Corbo, C., Molinaro, R., Taraballi, F., Toledano Furman, N. E., Hartman, K. A., Sherman, M. B., & Tasciotti, E. (2017). Unveiling the in vivo protein corona of circulating leukocyte-like carriers. ACS Nano, 11(3), 3262–3273. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b00376

El-Sayed Ellakwa, D., & Ellakwa, A. (2026). Advanced surface engineering and immune evasion strategies in modern nanoparticle design. Discover Materials, 6(1), 28–45.

Grenier, P., Viana, I. M. O., Lima, E. M., & Bertrand, N. (2018). Anti-polyethylene glycol antibodies alter the protein corona deposited on nanoparticles and the physiological pathways regulating their fate in vivo. Journal of Controlled Release, 287, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.08.022

Hadjidemetriou, M., Al-Ahmady, Z., Mazza, M., Collins, R. F., Dawson, K., & Kostarelos, K. (2015). In vivo biomolecule corona around blood-circulating, clinically used and antibody-targeted lipid bilayer nanoscale vesicles. ACS Nano, 9(8), 8142–8156. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03300

Hu, C.-M. J., Zhang, L., Aryal, S., Cheung, C., Fang, R. H., & Zhang, L. (2011). Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(27), 10980–10985. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106634108

Kang, X., Sun, T., Zhang, L., Zhou, C., Xu, Z., Du, M., Xiao, S., Liu, Y., Gong, M., & Zhang, D. (2021). Synergistic theranostics of magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy of breast cancer based on the Janus nanostructures Fe3O4-Au(shell)-PEG. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 16, 6383–6394. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S325252

Liu, J., Xu, F., Huang, J., Xu, J., Liu, Y., Yao, Y., Ao, M., Li, A., Hao, L., Cao, Y., Hu, Z., Ran, H., Wang, Z., & Li, P. (2018). Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU)-activated nanodroplets as a theranostic agent for noninvasive cancer molecular imaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials Science, 6(11), 2838–2849. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00685e

Loiola, L. M. D., Batista, M., Capeletti, L. B., Mondo, G. B., Rosa, R. S. M., Marques, R. E., & De Oliveira, R. J. (2019). Shielding and stealth effects of zwitterion moieties in double-functionalized silica nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 553, 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.044

Lv, H., Zhu, Y., Xue, J., Jia, X., & Chen, J. (2022). Targeted drug delivery system based on copper sulfide for synergistic near-infrared photothermal therapy/photodynamic therapy/chemotherapy of triple negative breast cancer. Langmuir, 38(50), 15766–15775. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02533

Molinaro, R., Corbo, C., Martinez, J. O., Taraballi, F., Evangelopoulos, M., Minardi, S., & Tasciotti, E. (2016). Biomimetic proteolipid vesicles for targeting inflamed tissues. Nature Materials, 15(10), 1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4644

Monopoli, M. P., Åberg, C., Salvati, A., & Dawson, K. A. (2012). Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nature Nanotechnology, 7(12), 779–786. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.207

Müller, J., Bauer, K. N., Prozeller, D., Simon, J., Mailänder, V., Wurm, F. R., & Landfester, K. (2017). Coating nanoparticles with tunable surfactants facilitates control over the protein corona. Biomaterials, 115, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.015

Oh, J. Y., Kim, H. S., Palanikumar, L., Go, E. M., Jana, B., Park, S. A., & Ryu, J. H. (2018). Cloaking nanoparticles with protein corona shield for targeted drug delivery. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4548. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06979-4

Omidian, H., Gill, E. J., & Cubeddu, L. X. (2025). Conjugate nanoparticles in cancer theranostics. Journal of Nanotheranostics, 6(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jnt6010002

Pontón, I., Núñez, S., Semino, C., & Sánchez-García, D. (2026). uPAR-targeted stealth small-sized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer therapy. Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 16(2), 2139–2152.

Qiang, L., Xu, K., & Taratula, O. (2022). Multifunctional M-Pt/PEG-CuS nanosystem for ovarian cancer theranostics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(12), 14210–14222.

Rampado, R., Crotti, S., Caliceti, P., Pucciarelli, S., & Agostini, M. (2020). Recent advances in understanding the protein corona of nanoparticles and in the formulation of stealthy nanomaterials. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00166

Sadauskas, E., Wallin, H., Stoltenberg, M., Vogel, U., Doering, P., Larsen, A., & Danscher, G. (2007). Kupffer cells are central in the removal of nanoparticles from the organism. Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 4(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-4-10

Sathuvan, M., Narayanan, K., Cheong, K. L., & Thangam, R. (2026). Nanoplatforms for multimodal imaging and targeted cancer therapy: Recent advances and future perspectives. Bioengineering, 13(2), 112–138.

Schöttler, S., Becker, G., Winzen, S., Steinbach, T., Mohr, K., Landfester, K., & Mailänder, V. (2016). Protein adsorption is required for stealth effect of poly(ethylene glycol)- and poly(phosphoester)-coated nanocarriers. Nature Nanotechnology, 11(4), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.330

Singh, S., Chauhan, V., Barik, P., & Chow, J. C. L. (2025). Molecular factors influencing the in vivo biobehaviors, clearance pathways, and protein corona evolution of gold nanoparticles. Molecular Cancer, 24(1), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-025-02418-3

Suk, J. S., Xu, Q., Kim, N., Hanes, J., & Ensign, L. M. (2016). PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 99, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.012

Takeuchi, T., Kitayama, Y., Sasao, R., Yamada, T., Toh, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Kataoka, K. (2017). Molecularly imprinted nanogels acquire stealth in situ by cloaking themselves with native dysopsonic proteins. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(25), 7088–7092. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201700647

Wang, B., Zhang, Y., & Liu, L. (2026). Nanotechnology-enabled advances in hepatocellular carcinoma theranostics. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 24(1), 475–492.

Wen, K., Xu, X., Chen, J., Lv, L., Wu, L., Hu, Y., Wu, X., Liu, G., Peng, A., & Huang, H. (2019). Triplet tellurophene-based semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for near-infrared-mediated cancer theranostics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(19), 17884–17893. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b03121

Wong, X. Y., Sena-Torralba, A., Álvarez-Diduk, R., Muthoosamy, K., & Merkoçi, A. (2020). Nanomaterials for nanotheranostics: Tuning their properties according to disease needs. ACS Nano, 14(3), 2585–2627.

Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Wu, L., & Chen, H. (2025a). An anionic and proline-rich peptide prolonged blood circulation of liposomes and evaded accelerated blood clearance after repeated administration. Journal of Controlled Release, 378, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.12.029

Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Wu, L., & Chen, H. (2025b). Rational design of intrinsically disordered polypeptides as next-generation stealth materials for photothermal cancer therapy. Small Science, 5(2), 20260012.

Zhao, J., Qin, Z., Wu, J., Li, L., Jin, Q., & Ji, J. (2018). Zwitterionic stealth peptide-protected gold nanoparticles enable long circulation without the accelerated blood clearance phenomenon. Biomaterials Science, 6(1), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00908a

Zhou, H., Fan, Z., Li, P. Y., Deng, J., Arhontoulis, D. C., Li, C. Y., & Huang, X. (2018). Dense and dynamic polyethylene glycol shells cloak nanoparticles from uptake by liver endothelial cells for long blood circulation. ACS Nano, 12(10), 10130–10141. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b04947


Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
43
Views

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



0
Save
0
Citation
43
View
0
Share