Journal of Primeasia

Integrative Disciplinary Research | Online ISSN 3064-9870 | Print ISSN 3069-4353
570
Citations
201.1k
Views
123
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
Figures and Tables
RESEARCH ARTICLE   (Open Access)

Intelligent Optimisation for Power System Stability: A Comparative Expert-Survey Analysis of Artificial Neural Networks, Particle Swarm Optimisation, Genetic Algorithms, Fuzzy Logic, and Hybrid AI Approaches

Md Atiqur Rahman1*, Md Shahdat Hossain2

+ Author Affiliations

Journal of Primeasia 2 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.2110773

Submitted: 26 July 2021 Revised: 19 October 2021  Published: 27 October 2021 


Abstract

Background: The structural transformation of electrical power networks — driven by accelerating renewable energy integration, distributed generation, and increasingly volatile demand patterns — has placed stability management under pressures that conventional linear control methods were not designed to handle. As intermittent sources now account for approximately 30% of generation in many national grids, the case for intelligent optimisation approaches has grown considerably, yet systematic comparative evidence across multiple techniques remains limited.

Methods: This study employed a quantitative, survey-based design combining structured expert elicitation with computational analysis. A validated 18-item Likert-scale questionnaire was administered to power systems professionals with a minimum of five years of relevant experience. Responses were preprocessed using standard data-cleaning protocols and min-max normalisation before being analysed across four intelligent optimisation techniques — Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO), Genetic Algorithms (GA), and Fuzzy Logic systems — as well as Hybrid AI configurations. Performance was evaluated using a weighted composite stability index across four dimensions: frequency stability, voltage regulation, load balancing, and system recovery.

Results: Renewable variability (15.6%) and load uncertainty (15.0%) emerged as the dominant strategic challenges, with both factors showing strong negative correlations with overall stability scores (r = −0.78 and r = −0.74, respectively). Hybrid AI systems led effectiveness rankings at 17.6%, followed by Deep Learning (16.5%) and ANN (15.9%), while conventional methods trailed at 12.3% — despite recording the highest adoption score (4.22). Optimisation adoption correlated strongly with grid reliability (r = 0.85), the strongest pairwise association in the dataset.

Conclusion: A meaningful gap exists between the methods most widely deployed and those most demonstrably effective. Bridging this divide — through targeted investment, workforce development, and regulatory adaptation — represents one of the more tractable pathways toward resilient, renewable-compatible power infrastructure.

Keywords: Power system stability, Intelligent optimization, Hybrid artificial intelligence, Renewable energy integration, Grid reliability

References


Akhavan-Hejazi, H., & Mohsenian-Rad, H. (2018). Power systems big data analytics: An assessment of paradigm shift barriers and prospects. Energy Reports, 4, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2017.11.002

Alhelou, H. H., Hamedani-Golshan, M. E., Njenda, T. C., & Siano, P. (2019). A survey on power system blackout and cascading Events: Research Motivations and challenges. Energies, 12(4), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040682

Al-Saedi, W., Lachowicz, S. W., Habibi, D., & Bass, O. (2013). Power flow control in grid-connected microgrid operation using Particle Swarm Optimization under variable load conditions. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 49, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.12.017

Basak, P., Chowdhury, S., Dey, S. H. N., & Chowdhury, S. (2012). A literature review on integration of distributed energy resources in the perspective of control, protection and stability of microgrid. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 5545–5556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.043

Bevrani, H., Ise, T., & Miura, Y. (2013). Virtual synchronous generators: A survey and new perspectives. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 54, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009

Calvillo, C., Sánchez-Miralles, A., & Villar, J. (2015). Energy management and planning in smart cities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.133

Frank, S., Steponavice, I., & Rebennack, S. (2012). Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I. Energy Systems, 3(3), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-012-0056-y

Gandoman, F. H., Ahmadi, A., Sharaf, A. M., Siano, P., Pou, J., Hredzak, B., & Agelidis, V. G. (2017). Review of FACTS technologies and applications for power quality in smart grids with renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.062

Habib, S., Kamran, M., & Rashid, U. (2014). Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks – A review. Journal of Power Sources, 277, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020

Hosseinzadeh, N., Aziz, A., Mahmud, A., Gargoom, A., & Rabbani, M. (2021). Voltage Stability of Power Systems with Renewable-Energy Inverter-Based Generators: A Review. Electronics, 10(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10020115

Hua, H., Wei, Z., Qin, Y., Wang, T., Li, L., & Cao, J. (2021). Review of distributed control and optimization in energy internet: From traditional methods to artificial intelligence-based methods. IET Cyber-Physical Systems Theory & Applications, 6(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1049/cps2.12007

Jing, W., Lai, C. H., Wong, S. H. W., & Wong, M. L. D. (2016). Battery-supercapacitor hybrid energy storage system in standalone DC microgrids: areview. IET Renewable Power Generation, 11(4), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0500

Kakran, S., & Chanana, S. (2017). Smart operations of smart grids integrated with distributed generation: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.045

Khare, V., Nema, S., & Baredar, P. (2016). Solar–wind hybrid renewable energy system: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.223

Krishna, K. S., & Kumar, K. S. (2015). A review on hybrid renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.187

Lund, H., Andersen, A. N., Østergaard, P. A., Mathiesen, B. V., & Connolly, D. (2012). From electricity smart grids to smart energy systems – A market operation based approach and understanding. Energy, 42(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.003

Mathiesen, B., Lund, H., Connolly, D., Wenzel, H., Østergaard, P., Möller, B., Nielsen, S., Ridjan, I., Karnøe, P., Sperling, K., & Hvelplund, F. (2015). Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions. Applied Energy, 145, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.075

Mwasilu, F., Justo, J. J., Kim, E., Duc, T., DO, & Jung, J. (2014). Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: A review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.031

Nemati, M., Braun, M., & Tenbohlen, S. (2017). Optimization of unit commitment and economic dispatch in microgrids based on genetic algorithm and mixed integer linear programming. Applied Energy, 210, 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.007

Olatomiwa, L., Mekhilef, S., Ismail, & Moghavvemi, M. (2016). Energy management strategies in hybrid renewable energy systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.040

Parra, D., Valverde, L., Pino, F. J., & Patel, M. K. (2018). A review on the role, cost and value of hydrogen energy systems for deep decarbonisation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.010

Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., & Keirstead, J. (2014). Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003

Rathor, S. K., & Saxena, D. (2020). Energy management system for smart grid: An overview and key issues. International Journal of Energy Research, 44(6), 4067–4109. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4883

Sujil, A., Verma, J., & Kumar, R. (2016). Multi agent system: concepts, platforms and applications in power systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 49(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-016-9520-8

Tan, X., Li, Q., & Wang, H. (2012). Advances and trends of energy storage technology in Microgrid. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 44(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.015

Wang, W., Luo, Q., Li, B., Wei, X., Li, L., & Yang, Z. (2012). Recent progress in Redox Flow battery research and development. Advanced Functional Materials, 23(8), 970–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200694

Wang, W., Xu, Y., & Khanna, M. (2011). A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid. Computer Networks, 55(15), 3604–3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.07.010

Yoldas, Y., Önen, A., Muyeen, S., Vasilakos, A. V., & Alan, I. (2017). Enhancing smart grid with microgrids: Challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.064

Zhou, B., Li, W., Chan, K. W., Cao, Y., Kuang, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2016). Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.047

Zhou, K., Fu, C., & Yang, S. (2015). Big data driven smart energy management: From big data to big insights. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.050


Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
26
Views

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



0
Save
0
Citation
26
View
0
Share