1. Introduction

Nitrogen is an essential macronutrient that underpins plant growth, contributing fundamentally to protein synthesis, enzyme activation, and chlorophyll formation. Despite constituting nearly 78% of the Earth’s atmosphere, atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is unavailable to plants in its gaseous form and must first be converted into reactive nitrogen compounds such as ammonia (NH3), nitrate (NO3?), and ammonium (NH4?) (Gutschick, 1981). These biologically available nitrogen forms originate primarily from soil organic matter, industrial fertilizers, or biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) mediated by microorganisms (Merrick, 1992).

In modern agriculture, nitrogen fertilizers have long been used to boost crop yields and sustain intensive farming systems. However, their overuse has resulted in severe ecological and environmental consequences, including soil degradation, eutrophication of water bodies, groundwater contamination, and the release of greenhouse gases such as nitrous oxide (Usha, 2018; Yang & Fang, 2015). The World Bank (2013) reported a steady increase in fertilizer consumption globally, highlighting the unsustainable reliance on synthetic nitrogen inputs. This practice has contributed not only to declining soil fertility but also to disruptions in the nitrogen cycle, posing a major challenge to achieving sustainable agricultural productivity (Liu et al., 2016; Shah & Wu, 2019). Consequently, there is an urgent need to explore natural, eco-friendly alternatives that enhance crop productivity without compromising environmental integrity.

One such sustainable solution lies in biological nitrogen fixation, (Figure 1) a process by which certain microorganisms—collectively termed diazotrophs—convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, making it available for plant uptake (Dixon & Kahn, 2004). These diazotrophic microorganisms can be broadly categorized into symbiotic, associative, and free-living nitrogen fixers. Symbiotic nitrogen fixers, such as Rhizobium species, form specialized nodules on the roots of leguminous plants where nitrogenase enzymes catalyze the conversion of N2 into ammonia (Perret et al., 2000; Oldroyd & Downie, 2008). Free-living bacteria, including Azotobacter and Clostridium, fix nitrogen independently in the rhizosphere, whereas associative species like Azospirillum establish close associations with non-leguminous crops, promoting nutrient uptake and root development (Bashan, 1998; Ravikumar et al., 2007). Frankia strains are another important group that forms symbioses with actinorhizal plants, contributing significantly to nitrogen enrichment in forest ecosystems (Benson & Silvester, 1993).

The nitrogenase enzyme complex, composed of iron (Fe) and molybdenum-iron (MoFe) proteins, is responsible for catalyzing the reduction of atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia under anaerobic conditions (Rubio & Ludden, 2008). This energy-intensive process requires ATP and reducing equivalents, highlighting the importance of a controlled oxygen environment maintained by leghemoglobin within root nodules (Ott et al., 2005). Genetic regulation of BNF involves complex molecular signaling pathways such as the FixL-FixJ-FixK cascade, which modulates nitrogenase gene expression in response to oxygen and nitrogen levels (Gao et al., 2010). Advances in molecular biology have further elucidated the coordination between nodule formation and rhizobial infection, emphasizing the role of plant-derived flavonoids in regulating host specificity (Liu & Murray, 2016; Suzaki et al., 2019).

In recent years, probiotic microorganisms—a subset of beneficial microbes that promote plant health—have gained significant attention for their role in sustainable nitrogen management (Adesemoye et al., 2009). Probiotics such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, and Rhizobium not only fix nitrogen but also enhance nutrient solubilization, induce systemic resistance, and suppress soil-borne pathogens (Kloepper et al., 2004). These microbes act as natural biofertilizers, improving plant growth and yield while maintaining soil microbial diversity (Araujo et al., 2012). Studies have shown that inoculating crops with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) significantly enhances nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency, particularly under nutrient-deficient or stress-prone conditions (Hirel et al., 2011; Beyan et al., 2018).

Furthermore, integrating probiotic-assisted nitrogen fixation into agricultural systems offers multiple ecological benefits. It reduces dependence on synthetic fertilizers, thereby decreasing agricultural input costs and mitigating nitrogen-driven environmental pollution (Kennedy & Islam, 2001; Santi et al., 2013). In addition, probiotic inoculants can improve soil structure, enhance water retention, and increase tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity (Ravikumar et al., 2007). For instance, field studies on soybean and rice systems have demonstrated that microbial inoculation enhances both nitrogen fixation rates and crop yield, confirming the viability of probiotics as an eco-friendly nitrogen source (Ladha & Reddy, 2003; Van Heerwaarden et al., 2018).

Despite these advantages, several challenges hinder the large-scale adoption of microbial inoculants. The survival and activity of introduced microbes are influenced by soil pH, moisture, temperature, and competition with native microbial communities (Hungria & Vargas, 2000). Moreover, inconsistency in field performance across different agroecological zones limits their widespread application (Bashan, 1998). Research on microbial consortia and genetic engineering of nitrogen-fixing strains is currently underway to overcome these limitations and enhance microbial efficiency under diverse field conditions (Mus et al., 2016; Dixon & Kahn, 2004). Developing robust microbial formulations that maintain viability and function under fluctuating environmental conditions is key to ensuring reliable nitrogen fixation performance.

Biotechnological advancements have opened new avenues for enhancing nitrogen fixation efficiency. Genomic studies have revealed potential pathways for transferring nitrogen-fixation genes to non-leguminous plants, which could revolutionize future agriculture (Sur et al., 2010). Synthetic biology approaches are also being explored to engineer microbial strains with enhanced nitrogenase activity, improved symbiotic compatibility, and higher resilience to abiotic stress (Santi et al., 2013). Additionally, the development of multi-functional biofertilizers that combine nitrogen-fixing, phosphate-solubilizing, and plant-growth-promoting bacteria could further optimize nutrient management in farming systems (Adesemoye et al., 2009; Shah & Wu, 2019).

In summary, probiotic-assisted biological nitrogen fixation represents a promising strategy to achieve sustainable agricultural productivity while reducing the ecological footprint of nitrogen fertilization. By leveraging the natural capabilities of diazotrophic microbes, it is possible to restore soil health, enhance nutrient efficiency, and mitigate the adverse impacts of chemical fertilizers on the environment. Continued research in microbial ecology, molecular biology, and biotechnology is essential to develop next-generation probiotic inoculants capable of transforming modern agriculture into a more resilient and sustainable system.

2. Methods

This review was conducted to synthesize current evidence on the role of nitrogen-fixing probiotics in enhancing soil fertility, crop productivity, and environmental sustainability. A systematic yet narrative approach was adopted to capture both experimental findings and conceptual insights regarding microbial mechanisms, agricultural applications, challenges, and future biotechnological advancements.

2.1 Literature Search Strategy

A comprehensive literature search was carried out across multiple academic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, covering publications from 1990 to 2025. The search combined key terms such as “nitrogen-fixing bacteria,” “biofertilizers,” “Azospirillum,” “Rhizobium,” “Azotobacter,” “soil fertility,” “sustainable agriculture,” “microbial consortia,” and “genetic engineering.” Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used to refine results and identify studies connecting microbial mechanisms with plant growth and environmental outcomes.

In addition to peer-reviewed journal articles, seminal reviews and meta-analyses were included to provide historical context and theoretical foundations. Reference lists of relevant papers were manually screened to identify additional studies not captured in database searches.

2.2 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Studies were included if they:

• Investigated the role of nitrogen-fixing probiotics in soil fertility, plant growth, or stress tolerance;
• Were published in English in peer-reviewed journals;
• Provided quantitative or qualitative data relevant to microbial mechanisms, crop yield, or environmental impact.

Both laboratory and field studies were considered to ensure a comprehensive understanding of microbial functionality and agricultural applicability. Excluded materials included editorials, conference abstracts, non-peer-reviewed reports, and studies lacking methodological transparency.

2.3 Data Extraction and Organization

Data from each study were manually extracted and organized into thematic categories, including:

• Types and mechanisms of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms;
• Symbiotic, associative, and free-living interactions;
• Agricultural benefits such as yield improvement, soil fertility, and stress resilience;
• Challenges in microbial survival, strain specificity, and scalability;
• Biotechnological advancements including genetic engineering and microbial consortia.

Information such as study design, microbial strain, host crop, environmental conditions, outcomes measured, and key findings were summarized into comparative tables, allowing identification of patterns, knowledge gaps, and research trends.

2.4 Quality Assessment

To ensure reliability, methodological rigor of each study was assessed using adapted criteria from the PRISMA framework. Factors considered included sample size, experimental design, presence of control groups, and reproducibility. Studies with low methodological quality or insufficient data transparency were excluded from detailed synthesis but occasionally referenced for contextual discussion.

2.5 Data Synthesis and Analysis

Given the interdisciplinary nature of nitrogen-fixing probiotics research, findings were synthesized narratively rather than statistically. Thematic integration highlighted connections between microbial mechanisms, plant physiology, and environmental outcomes. Contradictory evidence was critically examined to identify possible confounding factors such as microbial strain, host crop, soil type, climatic conditions, or experimental design.

3. Types of Nitrogen-Fixing Microorganisms

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is mediated by a wide array of diazotrophic microorganisms, which can be categorized into symbiotic, associative, and free-living nitrogen fixers. Each group contributes substantially to plant nitrogen nutrition, soil fertility, and sustainable agriculture. These microbes convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), a form readily absorbed by plants. Their involvement in the global nitrogen cycle is critical for maintaining agricultural productivity while reducing dependence on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers (Ladha & Reddy, 2003; Kennedy & Islam, 2001). A comprehensive understanding of the diversity, interactions, and ecological roles of these microorganisms is essential for optimizing their use in sustainable farming systems (Table 1).

3.1 Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria

Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria form mutualistic associations with specific host plants, particularly legumes, to facilitate nitrogen fixation. The most extensively studied symbionts belong to the genera Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium, which colonize roots of legumes such as soybean (Glycine max), pea (Pisum sativum), clover (Trifolium spp.), and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) (Van Heerwaarden et al., 2018; Beyan et al., 2018). These bacteria induce root nodule formation, specialized structures where nitrogen fixation occurs.

Nodule initiation involves a sophisticated chemical signaling exchange between the plant and bacterium. Legume roots release flavonoids, which attract compatible Rhizobium strains (Liu & Murray, 2016). In response, Rhizobium produces Nod factors, lipochitooligosaccharides that trigger root hair curling, cortical cell division, and infection thread formation (Perret, Staehelin, & Broughton, 2000). Once inside the nodule, bacteria differentiate into bacteroids, capable of reducing atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia via the nitrogenase enzyme complex. The host plant supplies carbohydrates and essential nutrients, while the bacteria provide fixed nitrogen in return (Dixon & Kahn, 2004; Oldroyd & Downie, 2008). Other symbiotic genera, such as Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium, display specificity toward particular legume species, emphasizing the importance of host compatibility (Gage, 2004).

3.2 Non-Leguminous Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixers

Although legume-associated BNF is widely recognized, some non-leguminous plants form symbiotic nitrogen-fixing partnerships with actinobacteria such as Frankia. Actinorhizal plants, including alder (Alnus spp.), casuarina (Casuarina spp.), and bayberry (Myrica spp.), harbor Frankia in root nodules, enabling atmospheric nitrogen fixation (Benson & Silvester, 1993; Santi, Bogusz, & Franche, 2013). Actinorhizal symbioses are particularly important in forest ecosystems and nutrient-poor soils, contributing to soil nitrogen enrichment without requiring seed inoculation (Dawson, 2008). These interactions illustrate the ecological relevance of non-legume nitrogen-fixing partnerships.

3.3 Associative Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria

Associative nitrogen fixers colonize plant roots or internal tissues without forming nodules. These microbes reside in the rhizosphere or endophytically within plant tissues and enhance nitrogen availability indirectly through root exudates and microbial interactions (Adesemoye, Torbert, & Kloepper, 2009).

Azospirillum: A Key Associative Fixer

Azospirillum is a well-studied facultative endophyte that colonizes roots of cereals and grasses, including wheat (Triticum aestivum), maize (Zea mays), and rice (Oryza sativa) (Bashan, 1998; Bashan & de-Bashan, 2010). This bacterium promotes plant growth not only through nitrogen fixation but also by synthesizing phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins, and cytokinins, which stimulate root elongation and enhance nutrient and water uptake efficiency (Steenhoudt & Vanderleyden, 2000).

Herbaspirillum and Gluconacetobacter

Other associative nitrogen fixers, including Herbaspirillum and Gluconacetobacter, inhabit crops such as sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), rice, and wheat (Boddey et al., 2003; Ravikumar et al., 2007). Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is particularly effective in fixing nitrogen within sugarcane stems, reducing the need for chemical fertilizers and improving sustainability in sugarcane cultivation (Reis et al., 2000).

3.4 Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria

Free-living nitrogen fixers function independently of plant hosts and play critical roles in soil nitrogen enrichment. These organisms contribute to nitrogen availability in both agricultural and natural ecosystems.

Azotobacter: A Model Free-Living Fixer

Azotobacter is a widely studied aerobic diazotroph capable of efficient nitrogen fixation (Kennedy & Islam, 2001). It also secretes polysaccharides that improve soil structure and water retention, alongside growth-promoting compounds such as IAA, gibberellins, and vitamins (Bashan, 1998).

Clostridium and Beijerinckia

Anaerobic bacteria like Clostridium fix nitrogen under oxygen-limited conditions, such as waterlogged soils, while Beijerinckia species thrive in acidic soils, supporting nitrogen availability where other diazotrophs are less efficient (Kennedy & Islam, 2001; Bashan, 1998).

3.5 Role in Soil Fertility

Free-living nitrogen fixers enhance soil nitrogen pools by releasing ammonia and related compounds that plants can absorb. Their role is especially significant in organic and low-input farming systems (Bashan, 1998). Although less efficient than symbiotic or associative bacteria due to the lack of continuous plant-derived energy, their contributions to soil fertility are indispensable. Environmental factors such as pH, moisture, and carbon availability strongly influence free-living nitrogen fixation activity (Hungria & Vargas, 2000; Ladha & Reddy, 2003).

Table 1. Types of Nitrogen-Fixing Microorganisms and Their Characteristics

Note: This table categorizes nitrogen-fixing microorganisms into symbiotic, associative, and free-living groups, highlighting their host specificity, mechanism of nitrogen fixation, and key functional traits.

4. Molecular Mechanisms of Biological Nitrogen Fixation

BNF is a sophisticated biochemical process in which diazotrophic microorganisms reduce atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), providing plants with essential nitrogen (Rubio & Ludden, 2008). This process is highly regulated at the molecular level, encompassing the nitrogenase enzyme complex, genetic regulation, and symbiotic signaling pathways, all of which are sensitive to environmental cues such as oxygen levels, nitrogen availability, and carbon sources (Zheng et al., 2019) (Figure 2).

4.1 The Nitrogenase Enzyme Complex

Nitrogenase is the key enzyme responsible for converting N2 into NH3. It is conserved among diazotrophic bacteria and archaea, reflecting its central role in global nitrogen cycling (Rubio & Ludden, 2008; Seefeldt et al., 2009).

Structure and Function: Nitrogenase consists of two proteins:

• Dinitrogenase (MoFe protein): Catalytic subunit containing molybdenum (Mo), iron (Fe), and sulfur (S) clusters; responsible for breaking the triple bond in N2 molecules.
• Dinitrogenase reductase (Fe protein): Transfers electrons to dinitrogenase using ATP hydrolysis (Rubio & Ludden, 2008).

Alternative Nitrogenases: Some diazotrophs utilize vanadium or iron-only nitrogenases under molybdenum-deficient or extreme conditions (Eady, 1996).

4.2 Genetic Regulation of Nitrogen Fixation

Nitrogen fixation is tightly controlled genetically to ensure energy-efficient nitrogenase expression. nif genes encode nitrogenase components and associated regulators, with transcription influenced by oxygen and nitrogen availability (Dixon & Kahn, 2004; Merrick, 1992).

Key Regulators in Rhizobium:

• NifA: Activates nif gene transcription under low nitrogen conditions.
• NifL: Inhibits NifA when nitrogen or oxygen levels are high (Dixon & Kahn, 2004).
• Global Networks: Additional systems such as FixJ-FixK and sigma factors like RpoN coordinate nitrogenase expression with cellular metabolism (Gao et al., 2010).

4.3 Symbiotic Signaling Pathways

Legume-Rhizobium interactions rely on precise chemical signaling. Flavonoids secreted by roots attract Rhizobium, which responds by producing Nod factors that bind plant receptor kinases, triggering root hair curling and infection thread formation (Perret et al., 2000; Oldroyd & Downie, 2008). Bacteria differentiate into bacteroids within symbiosomes, fixing nitrogen in exchange for plant-derived carbon (Gage, 2004).

4.4 Regulation of Symbiosis

Symbiotic BNF requires stringent regulation:

• Nodulation Suppression: Autoregulation limits excessive nodulation, balancing carbon and nitrogen needs (Van Heerwaarden et al., 2018).
• Oxygen Regulation: Leghemoglobin controls nodule oxygen levels to protect nitrogenase activity (Ott et al., 2005).
• Host Specificity: Cross-inoculation groups define which Rhizobium strains associate with particular legumes (e.g., Rhizobium leguminosarum with peas and clover; Bradyrhizobium japonicum with soybeans) (Perret et al., 2000; Beyan et al., 2018).

5. Agricultural and Environmental Benefits of Probiotic-Assisted Nitrogen Fixation

The integration of nitrogen-fixing probiotics into agricultural systems presents a sustainable strategy to enhance soil fertility, increase crop productivity, and reduce environmental degradation. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) contributes to sustainable agriculture by decreasing dependence on synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, which are costly and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and water pollution (Mueller et al., 2012; Usha, 2018). Nitrogen-fixing probiotics, including Rhizobium, Azospirillum, and Frankia, are pivotal in nutrient cycling and plant growth promotion through both direct and indirect mechanisms. This section highlights the agricultural advantages of probiotic-assisted nitrogen fixation and its broader environmental implications (Table 2).

5.1 Enhanced Crop Yields and Soil Fertility

Nitrogen-fixing probiotics enhance soil nitrogen availability, which improves crop yields and maintains long-term soil fertility. Symbiotic bacteria such as Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium form nodules on legume roots, functioning as biological factories that convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia for plant assimilation (Adesemoye, Torbert, & Kloepper, 2009; Beyan, Wolde-Meskel, & Dakora, 2018).

Increased Crop Yields: Numerous studies have reported that inoculating crops with nitrogen-fixing probiotics significantly increases yields. For instance, Rhizobium inoculation in soybeans, peas, and chickpeas can raise yields by up to 30% compared to uninoculated plants (Hungria & Vargas, 2000; Van Heerwaarden et al., 2018). Cereals such as wheat and maize benefit from associative nitrogen fixers like Azospirillum, which enhance nitrogen uptake and stimulate root development (Bashan, 1998; Kloepper, Ryu, & Zhang, 2004).

• Soil Fertility and Organic Matter Content: Beyond direct nitrogen fixation, probiotic bacteria contribute to soil fertility by:
• Enhancing microbial diversity – Beneficial nitrogen-fixing bacteria improve soil microbial balance, promoting synergistic interactions (Araujo et al., 2012).
• Increasing organic matter content – Decomposition of bacterial biomass and plant residues enriches soil organic matter, enhancing nutrient retention and structure (Maheswari, Murthy, & Shanker, 2017).
• Stimulating nutrient solubilization – Certain nitrogen-fixing bacteria secrete organic acids that solubilize phosphorus and other nutrients, improving plant availability (Hirel, Tétu, Lea, & Dubois, 2011).

5.2 Reduction of Synthetic Fertilizer Use

The overuse of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers causes environmental problems, including nitrogen leaching, eutrophication, and increased nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (Yang & Fang, 2015; World Bank, 2013). Probiotic-assisted nitrogen fixation provides a natural nitrogen source for crops, reducing synthetic fertilizer reliance (Liu et al., 2016).

Economic and Environmental Benefits:

• Lower input costs – Farmers can reduce fertilizer expenses without compromising yields by using nitrogen-fixing probiotics (Mugabe, 1994; Adesemoye et al., 2009).
• Minimized nitrogen leaching – Biological nitrogen fixation provides controlled nitrogen release, lowering groundwater contamination risks (Kennedy & Islam, 2001).
• Decreased N2O emissions – BNF reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to chemical fertilizers (Liu, Ma, Ciais, & Polasky, 2016).

Case Study: Biofertilizer Adoption: In Brazil, extensive use of Rhizobium inoculants in soybean farming saved approximately $1.3 billion annually while maintaining high yields, demonstrating both economic and environmental feasibility (Hungria & Vargas, 2000; Ladha & Reddy, 2003).

5.3 Improved Plant Resilience

Probiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria also enhance plant tolerance to environmental stresses through multiple mechanisms:

• Production of Phytohormones – Azospirillum produces auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins, promoting root elongation, water uptake, and overall plant vigor (Bashan, 1998; Kloepper et al., 2004).
• Induction of Systemic Resistance (ISR) – Certain probiotics activate plant defense responses, increasing resistance to pathogens and abiotic stressors (Kloepper et al., 2004; Jimenez-Jimenez et al., 2019).
• Improved Soil Structure and Water Retention – Exopolysaccharides produced by nitrogen-fixing bacteria improve soil aggregation, enhancing water retention and drought tolerance (Adesemoye et al., 2009).
• Drought and Salinity Tolerance: Inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria mitigates drought and salinity stress by enhancing root architecture, producing osmoprotectants, and improving nutrient uptake (Bashan, 1998; Mus et al., 2016). For example, Azospirillum inoculation promotes maize and wheat growth in saline soils, increasing biomass despite high salinity levels (Ravikumar et al., 2007).
• Heavy Metal Detoxification: Industrial pollution accumulates toxic metals in soils. Certain nitrogen-fixing bacteria, including Azotobacter and Rhizobium, chelate heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, and arsenic, preventing plant uptake and enabling phytoremediation (Hirel et al., 2011; Shah & Wu, 2019).

Table 2. Agricultural Benefits of Nitrogen-Fixing Probiotics

Note: This table summarizes the main agricultural benefits of probiotic-assisted nitrogen fixation, including enhanced crop yields, improved soil fertility, stress tolerance, and reduced reliance on chemical fertilizers

6. Challenges and Limitations of Probiotic-Assisted Nitrogen Fixation

Despite the benefits, several factors limit the adoption of nitrogen-fixing probiotics. Their efficiency depends on environmental, biological, and economic variables that affect survival, functionality, and scalability (Table 3).

6.1 Microbial Survival and Field Adaptability

Field conditions are far more variable than controlled laboratory environments, challenging the survival and activity of microbial inoculants.

• Competition with Native Microbiota: Introduced bacteria must compete with indigenous microbes for root colonization and ecological niches. Native nitrogen fixers can reduce the effectiveness of introduced strains (Bashan, 1998; Kennedy & Islam, 2001).
• Environmental Influences:
• Soil pH: Optimal bacterial activity occurs in neutral to slightly acidic soils; extremes inhibit growth and symbiosis (Hungria & Vargas, 2000).
• Temperature: Azospirillum and other probiotics function best between 25–35°C; efficiency declines under extreme temperatures (Bashan, 1998).
• Soil Moisture and Organic Matter: Waterlogged or dry soils limit microbial movement and activity, while organic matter generally supports survival (Rodriguez et al., 2004; Hirel et al., 2011).

6.2 Strain-Specificity and Host Compatibility

Symbiotic nitrogen fixation exhibits host specificity, limiting the applicability of a single inoculant across multiple crops.

• Host-Specificity: Legume-associated bacteria such as Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium nodulate specific plants:
• Rhizobium leguminosarum nodulates peas and lentils but not soybeans.
• Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodulates soybeans but not clover (Beyan et al., 2018; Oldroyd & Downie, 2008).
• Strain Performance Variability: Soil conditions, climate, and plant genotype influence nitrogen fixation efficiency, leading to inconsistent results across regions (Hungria & Vargas, 2000; Ladha & Reddy, 2003).
• Potential Solutions: Researchers explore:
• Multi-strain inoculants for wider crop compatibility (Bashan, 1998).
• Genetic modifications to expand bacterial host range (Liu & Murray, 2016).
• Microbial consortia combining nitrogen-fixing bacteria with other beneficial microbes (Mus et al., 2016).

6.3 Cost and Scalability

Scaling up production and commercialization presents economic and logistical hurdles.

Production Challenges:

• Cultivation, stabilization, and formulation of microbial inoculants can be costly while maintaining high viability (Bashan, 1998; Vessey, 2003).
• Storage and transport constraints, including temperature and carrier requirements, affect shelf life and efficacy (Vessey, 2003).

Economic Considerations:

• Initial costs may deter smallholder farmers despite long-term benefits (Adesemoye et al., 2009).
• Variable field performance compared to synthetic fertilizers may reduce farmer confidence (Mueller et al., 2012; Usha, 2018).

Table 3. Challenges and Biotechnological Advances in Nitrogen-Fixing Probiotics

Note: This table presents challenges in applying nitrogen-fixing probiotics in agriculture, along with biotechnological strategies to overcome limitations, including microbial consortia, genetic engineering, and advanced formulation technologies.

7. Future Perspectives and Biotechnological Advancements

To address the current challenges of probiotic-assisted nitrogen fixation, researchers are exploring innovative biotechnological strategies aimed at enhancing microbial nitrogen-fixation efficiency, improving field adaptability, and ensuring long-term sustainability in agricultural systems. Advances in genetic engineering, microbial consortia, and biofertilizer formulation are transforming the future of biological nitrogen fixation. These approaches have the potential to reduce dependence on chemical fertilizers while promoting environmentally sustainable farming practices (Hirel, Tétu, Lea, & Dubois, 2011; Mus et al., 2016).

7.1 Genetic Engineering of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbes

Genetic engineering has become a key tool to improve the nitrogen-fixing capacity of bacteria and expand their applications to non-leguminous crops. Molecular biology techniques now enable modifications of nitrogenase activity, stress tolerance, and plant-microbe interactions (Rubio & Ludden, 2008; Dixon & Kahn, 2004).

Enhancing Nitrogenase Activity: The nitrogenase enzyme is highly sensitive to oxygen, limiting its efficiency in agricultural soils. Genetic approaches aim to:

• Increase nitrogenase expression in bacteria, thereby enhancing nitrogen fixation rates (Mus et al., 2016).
• Improve oxygen tolerance in nitrogen-fixing bacteria, boosting survival under variable field conditions (Benson & Silvester, 1993).
• Introduce alternative nitrogenase enzymes with higher efficiency under aerobic conditions (Dixon & Kahn, 2004).
• Engineering Non-Leguminous Crops: While legumes naturally host nitrogen-fixing bacteria, staple crops such as rice, wheat, and maize typically lack this capability. Efforts include:
• Transferring nitrogen-fixation genes into cereals to enable atmospheric nitrogen assimilation (Santi, Bogusz, & Franche, 2013).
• Modifying root exudates to attract nitrogen-fixing microbes and enhance colonization (Liu & Murray, 2016).
• Creating synthetic symbioses by transferring nodulation genes from legumes to non-legumes (Oldroyd & Downie, 2008).

7.2 Development of Microbial Consortia

Single-strain inoculants often face challenges due to competition with native soil microbes and environmental stress. To overcome this, researchers are developing microbial consortia, where multiple beneficial microbes interact synergistically to improve plant growth and soil fertility (Araujo et al., 2012; Kloepper et al., 2004).

Combining Nitrogen-Fixing and Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria: Nitrogen alone may not meet crop nutrient demands if phosphorus is limiting. Co-inoculation of nitrogen-fixing bacteria like Rhizobium with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) improves both nitrogen and phosphorus availability, enhancing crop growth (Hirel et al., 2011; Ladha & Reddy, 2003).

Integration with Mycorrhizal Fungi: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic associations with plant roots, improving nutrient and water absorption. When combined with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, AMF:

• Enhance root colonization and nutrient exchange (Mus et al., 2016; Ininbergs et al., 2011).
• Increase stress tolerance under drought and saline conditions (Ravikumar et al., 2007).
• Reduce fertilizer dependence by simultaneously improving nitrogen and phosphorus availability (Beyan et al., 2018).

These biotechnological advancements, combining genetic engineering and microbial consortia, hold great promise for achieving sustainable agricultural productivity while minimizing environmental impacts. By optimizing plant-microbe interactions and nutrient cycling, these strategies could significantly reduce the reliance on chemical fertilizers, addressing both economic and ecological challenges in modern farming systems (Hirel et al., 2011; Santi et al., 2013).

8.Conclusion

The integration of nitrogen-fixing probiotics into agriculture offers a sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers by naturally supplying essential nitrogen and enhancing soil fertility. Symbiotic bacteria like Rhizobium, associative microbes such as Azospirillum, and free-living nitrogen fixers including Azotobacter contribute to nutrient cycling, while the nitrogenase enzyme complex and symbiotic signaling pathways ensure efficient plant-microbe interactions. Probiotic-assisted nitrogen fixation improves crop yields, soil fertility, and plant resilience to stresses such as drought, salinity, and heavy metals, while reducing nitrogen leaching and environmental pollution. Challenges remain, including microbial survival, strain specificity, and large-scale production constraints, influenced by soil conditions and native microbial competition. Future biotechnological advancements—including genetic engineering, microbial consortia, and advanced biofertilizer formulations—aim to enhance nitrogen-fixation efficiency and field adaptability. With further research, regulatory support, and farmer adoption, nitrogen-fixing probiotics can revolutionize agriculture, promoting food security, reducing chemical inputs, and supporting environmental sustainability.

References

Adesemoye, A. O., Torbert, H. A., & Kloepper, J. W. (2009). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and nutrient uptake. Applied Soil Ecology, 42(3), 236–245.

Araujo, A., Leite, L., De Iwata, B., De Lira, M., Xavier, G., & Figueiredo, M. V. B. (2012). Microbiological processes in agroforestry systems: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0026-0

Bashan, Y. (1998). Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnology Advances, 16(4), 729–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00003-2

Benson, D. R., & Silvester, W. B. (1993). Biology of Frankia strains. Microbiological Reviews, 57(2), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.57.2.293-319.1993

Beyan, S. M., Wolde-Meskel, E., & Dakora, F. D. (2018). An assessment of plant growth and N2 fixation in soybean genotypes grown in uninoculated soils collected from different locations in Ethiopia. Symbiosis, 75, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-018-0540-9

Dixon, R., & Kahn, D. (2004). Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2(8), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro954

Gao, M., et al. (2010). The FixL-FixJ-FixK regulatory cascade. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 23(10), 1326–1335.

Gutschick, V. P. (1981). Nitrogen fixation in plants: Multiple forms, multiple functions. American Journal of Botany, 68(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2442865

Hirel, B., Tétu, T., Lea, P. J., & Dubois, F. (2011). Improving nitrogen use efficiency in crops for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 3, 1452–1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3091452

Hungria, M., & Vargas, M. A. (2000). Environmental factors affecting N2 fixation. Field Crops Research, 65(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00084-2

IEA/IRENA. (2017). Perspectives for the energy transition. https://go.nature.com/2pgkfwd

Ininbergs, K., Bay, G., Rasmussen, U., Wardle, D. A., & Nilsson, M. C. (2011). Composition and diversity of nifH genes of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria associated with boreal forest feather mosses. New Phytologist, 192, 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03809.x

Jimenez-Jimenez, S., Santana, O., Lara-Rojas, F., et al. (2019). Differential tetraspanin genes expression and subcellular localization during mutualistic interactions in Phaseolus vulgaris. PLoS ONE, 14, e0219765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219765

Kennedy, I. R., & Islam, N. (2001). The current and potential contribution of asymbiotic nitrogen fixation to nitrogen requirements. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33(1), 1–18.

Kloepper, J. W., Ryu, C. M., & Zhang, S. (2004). Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology, 94(11), 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1259

Ladha, J. K., & Reddy, P. M. (2003). Nitrogen fixation in rice systems. Field Crops Research, 80(2), 1–11.

Liu, C. W., & Murray, J. D. (2016). The role of flavonoids in nodulation host-range specificity: An update. Plants, 5(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5030033

Liu, J., Ma, K., Ciais, P., & Polasky, S. (2016). Reducing human nitrogen use for food production. Scientific Reports, 6, 30104. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30104

Maheswari, M., Murthy, A. N. G., & Shanker, A. K. (2017). Nitrogen nutrition in crops and its importance in crop quality. In The Indian nitrogen assessment: Sources of reactive nitrogen, environmental and climate effects, management options, and policies (pp. 175–186). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811836-8.00012-4

Merrick, M. J. (1992). Regulation of nitrogen fixation genes in free-living and symbiotic bacteria. Microbiological Reviews, 56(1), 58–83.

Mueller, N. D., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., et al. (2012). Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 490, 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11420

Mugabe, J. (1994). Research on biofertilizers: Kenya, Zimbabwe and Tanzania. Biotechnology Development Monitor, 18, 9–10.

Mus, F., Crook, M. B., Garcia, K., et al. (2016). Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and the challenges to its extension to non-legumes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82, 3698–3710. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01055-16

Oldroyd, G. E., & Downie, J. A. (2008). Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 519–546. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092839

Ott, T., et al. (2005). Leghemoglobin’s role in oxygen transport. Plant Physiology, 137(3), 1065–1074.

Perret, X., Staehelin, C., & Broughton, W. J. (2000). Molecular basis of symbiotic specificity in Rhizobium–legume interactions. Plant Physiology, 124(2), 531–540.

Ravikumar, S., Kathiresan, K., Alikhan, S. L., Williams, G. P., Anitha, N., & Gracelin, A. (2007). Growth of Avicennia marina and Ceriops decandra seedlings inoculated with halophilic Azotobacters. Journal of Environmental Biology, 28, 601–603.

Rubio, L. M., & Ludden, P. W. (2008). Biosynthesis of the nitrogenase metalloclusters. Annual Review of Microbiology, 62, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162737

Saikia, S. P., & Jain, V. (2007). Biological nitrogen fixation with non-legumes: An achievable target or a dogma? Current Science, 92, 317–322.

Santi, C., Bogusz, D., & Franche, C. (2013). Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Annals of Botany, 111(5), 743–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct048

Shah, F., & Wu, W. (2019). Soil and crop management strategies to ensure higher crop productivity within sustainable environments. Sustainability, 11, 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051485

Sur, S., Bothra, A. K., & Sen, A. (2010). Symbiotic nitrogen fixation: A bioinformatics perspective. Biotechnology, 9, 257–273. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2010.257.273

Suzaki, T., Takeda, N., Nishida, H., et al. (2019). Lack of symbiont accommodation controls intracellular symbiont accommodation in root nodule and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. PLoS Genetics, 15, e1007966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007966

Usha, B. (2018). Agriculture and the dark side of chemical fertilizers. Environmental Analysis & Ecology Studies, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31031/EAES.2018.03.000552

Van Heerwaarden, J., Baijukya, F., Kyei-Boahen, S., et al. (2018). Soybean response to rhizobium inoculation across sub-Saharan Africa: Patterns of variation and the role of promiscuity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 261, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.016

Welte, C. U. (2018). Revival of archaeal methane microbiology. mSystems, 3(1), e00181–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00181-17

World Bank. (2013). Fertilizer consumption (AG.CON.FERT.ZS). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.CON.FERT.ZS

Yang, X., & Fang, S. (2015). Practices, perceptions, and implications of fertilizer use in East-Central China. Ambio, 44, 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0639-7

Zheng, M., Zhou, Z., Luo, Y., Zhao, P., & Mo, J. (2019). Global pattern and controls of biological nitrogen fixation under nutrient enrichment: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 25, 3018–3030. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14705