1. Introduction

Poultry farming plays a vital role in global food production, supplying affordable and nutrient-rich protein to meet the demands of an expanding population. However, as production intensifies to meet rising consumption needs, environmental concerns—particularly odor emissions—have emerged as a major challenge. Poultry odor, a byproduct of manure decomposition, primarily consists of ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These emissions contribute significantly to air pollution, reduced air quality, and broader environmental degradation (Khan & Iqbal, 2016; Broom, 2015). Beyond environmental issues, these odors adversely affect poultry health, worker well-being, and the quality of life for nearby communities, often leading to public complaints and stricter environmental regulations (Banupriya, Kathirvelan, & Joshua, 2016). Thus, developing sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible odor mitigation strategies has become a critical goal for the poultry industry.

Traditional odor management approaches in poultry operations include chemical additives, ventilation systems, and improved manure management practices. While these measures can offer temporary relief, their long-term sustainability and environmental compatibility remain limited (Abdelrazek et al., 2016). Chemical treatments, such as acidifiers and disinfectants, can neutralize certain compounds but may create new environmental hazards or residues in waste streams. Ventilation systems, although essential for air circulation, do not address the biochemical origins of odor generation (Jadhao et al., 2019). Moreover, the rising costs and environmental footprint associated with conventional odor control technologies have prompted researchers to explore biological alternatives that can sustainably suppress odor formation at its microbial source.

In recent years, probiotics have emerged as a promising, eco-friendly solution for odor control in poultry production systems. Probiotics are beneficial microorganisms that enhance intestinal balance, improve nutrient utilization, and modulate host metabolism. When included in poultry feed or water, these microbes optimize gut microbiota, enhance digestion, and alter nitrogen metabolism, thereby reducing the excretion of undigested protein and uric acid—precursors of ammonia and VOC emissions (El-Hack et al., 2020; Jadhao et al., 2019). Research has demonstrated that probiotic strains such as Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Saccharomyces can inhibit odor-producing bacteria in poultry manure and improve intestinal health simultaneously (Lokman et al., 2019; Hossain & Blair, 2007). These beneficial microbes can also produce organic acids that lower intestinal pH, suppressing the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria responsible for odor generation (Khan & Iqbal, 2016; Broom, 2015).

The combined use of probiotics and organic acids has shown particular promise. Organic acids such as citric and acetic acids act synergistically with probiotic microorganisms to enhance nutrient digestibility, improve intestinal morphology, and reduce ammonia emissions (Abdelrazek et al., 2016; Banupriya et al., 2016). Studies have indicated that acidification of poultry diets and drinking water enhances enzyme activity and microbial balance, leading to reduced nitrogen loss and improved feed conversion ratios (Tabata et al., 2018; Jadhao et al., 2019). Additionally, by fostering a healthier gut microbiome, probiotics indirectly influence manure composition, leading to lower concentrations of odoriferous compounds and improved manure stability (El-Hack et al., 2020).

Beyond odor mitigation, probiotics confer multiple co-benefits for poultry health and productivity. They enhance immune responses, increase antioxidant activity, and improve nutrient absorption—factors that contribute to stronger growth performance and reduced disease incidence (Lokman et al., 2019; Ibitoye et al., 2019). Furthermore, probiotics can reduce the need for antibiotic growth promoters, aligning with the global movement toward antibiotic-free, sustainable poultry production (Dörper, Veldkamp, & Dicke, 2020; Baltic et al., 2017). As environmental sustainability becomes an essential benchmark for modern agriculture, probiotics offer a biological strategy that integrates productivity enhancement with ecological responsibility.

Emerging research also explores the integration of chitin- and chitosan-based materials derived from insect and shrimp waste as prebiotic or synergistic supplements to probiotic formulations (Benhabiles et al., 2012; Sánchez et al., 2017). These natural biopolymers improve gut health, stimulate beneficial microbial growth, and reduce ammonia and volatile fatty acid production in poultry manure (Khempaka, Chitsatchapong, & Molee, 2011; Lokman et al., 2019). The inclusion of chitinous feed ingredients, such as black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) meal, further promotes circular economy principles in poultry nutrition while enhancing odor control and nutrient efficiency (El-Hack et al., 2020; Dörper et al., 2020).

Despite their promise, probiotic-based odor control systems are influenced by several factors, including microbial strain specificity, feed composition, and environmental conditions. The diversity of poultry housing systems, manure management practices, and climatic variations necessitates tailored probiotic formulations for different production contexts (Broom, 2015; Abdelrazek et al., 2016). Moreover, the synergistic use of probiotics with other biological additives, such as organic acids and chitin derivatives, requires optimization to ensure efficacy and cost-effectiveness at commercial scales.

This review aims to comprehensively examine the mechanisms through which probiotics influence odor generation in poultry systems, focusing on their interactions with gut microbiota, nitrogen metabolism, and manure chemistry. It also synthesizes experimental findings on the efficacy of different microbial strains, organic acid combinations, and chitin-based supplements in reducing odor emissions. By advancing an understanding of microbial-based odor mitigation, this study contributes to the development of sustainable poultry production strategies that reduce environmental impact, improve animal welfare, and foster healthier relationships between poultry operations and surrounding communities.

2. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Poultry Odor Formation

Poultry odor primarily arises from digestive and metabolic processes occurring within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of birds. The gut microbiota—a diverse community of bacteria, fungi, and archaea—plays a crucial role in breaking down feed components, assimilating nutrients, and generating metabolic byproducts. While beneficial microbes aid digestion and immunity, certain microbial groups are directly responsible for producing odoriferous compounds such as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017). Understanding the microbiota’s contribution to poultry odor formation is vital for developing interventions—such as probiotics—that can alter microbial composition and mitigate harmful emissions (Lan et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016).

2.1 Microbial Fermentation and Odor Production

Incomplete digestion of protein-rich diets in poultry often leads to microbial fermentation in the lower intestines and ceca. During this process, undigested nitrogenous compounds are converted into ammonia and other gases that contribute to strong manure odors (Mallo et al., 2017; Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014). Sulfur-containing amino acids, such as cysteine and methionine, are metabolized by sulfate-reducing bacteria into hydrogen sulfide, a gas responsible for the characteristic rotten-egg smell (Schiffman et al., 2006; O’Neill & Phillips, 1992). Moreover, microbial degradation of carbohydrates produces VFAs—acetic, propionic, and butyric acids—that intensify the odor profile of poultry waste (Clanton et al., 1999; Sweeten et al., 2006). Common odor-producing microbes include Clostridium, Enterobacteriaceae, and Desulfovibrio species, which proliferate under anaerobic and nutrient-rich conditions (Barrett, 2016; Patterson & Burkholder, 2003).

2.2 Probiotics and Gut Microbial Modulation

Probiotics modulate gut microbiota by promoting beneficial bacteria that outcompete odor-producing microbes through competitive exclusion (Fuller, 1989; Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Strains such as Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Bifidobacterium lower intestinal pH through lactic acid production, thereby suppressing ammonia-producing Clostridium species (Gaggia et al., 2010; Lan et al., 2016). Bacillus-based probiotics enhance enzyme activity, improving feed digestibility and reducing undigested proteins that lead to nitrogenous gas production (Mallo et al., 2017; Song et al., 2015). Additionally, probiotic supplementation can decrease hydrogen sulfide generation by modulating sulfate-reducing bacterial populations and enhancing gut microbial balance (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017).

2.3 Impact of Probiotic Supplementation on Ammonia and Odor Reduction

Numerous studies demonstrate that probiotics significantly reduce ammonia and odor emissions in poultry environments. For example, Lactobacillus-based probiotics have been shown to lower ammonia levels by improving protein digestion and nitrogen utilization efficiency (Song et al., 2015; Mallo et al., 2017). Similarly, Bacillus subtilis supplementation reduced hydrogen sulfide emissions in poultry manure by decreasing sulfate-reducing bacterial activity (Lan et al., 2016). These effects are attributed to enhanced production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that stabilize gut microbiota and inhibit pathogenic bacteria, thereby minimizing substrate availability for odor-causing fermentation (Zhao et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017).

2.4 Practical Considerations for Probiotic Application

The effectiveness of probiotics in mitigating poultry odor depends on strain selection, dosage, and method of administration. Some probiotics are more effective in feed inclusion, while others perform better through water delivery systems (Mallo et al., 2017; Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Multi-strain formulations often provide broader benefits than single strains due to synergistic interactions (Dahiya et al., 2006; Gaggia et al., 2010). Environmental factors—including bird density, diet composition, and manure management—also influence probiotic efficacy and odor outcomes (Sweeten et al., 2006; Jacobson et al., 2005). Therefore, probiotics should be integrated into a comprehensive odor management strategy encompassing proper ventilation, nutrient balance, and waste handling (Barrett, 2016; O’Connor et al., 2017).

Table 1: Effects of Probiotics on Poultry Gut Microbial Composition

3. Probiotics as a Sustainable Alternative to Chemical Odor Control Methods

For decades, poultry farmers have relied on chemical treatments and mechanical interventions to manage odor emissions. Common chemical methods include acidifiers, ammonia binders, and antimicrobial agents, all designed to neutralize or reduce the production of odor-causing compounds. While these strategies can provide short-term relief, they are associated with environmental, economic, and health concerns (Zhao et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2017; Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Improper application of chemical treatments can alter soil chemistry, affect nutrient availability, and pose safety risks to farmworkers. In addition, antimicrobial agents, including antibiotics, are increasingly restricted due to concerns over antimicrobial resistance and consumer demand for antibiotic-free poultry products (Dibner & Richards, 2005). Probiotics, by contrast, offer a natural, biologically driven approach to reducing poultry odor at the source. By modulating gut microbial communities responsible for odor production, probiotics not only mitigate emissions but also enhance bird health, feed efficiency, and overall farm sustainability (Fuller, 1989; Gaggia et al., 2010).

3.1 Limitations of Chemical Odor Control Methods

Acidifiers, such as sulfuric acid or organic acids, are commonly applied to poultry manure to lower pH and inhibit ammonia volatilization (Zhao et al., 2016; Abdelrazek et al., 2016). While effective in the short term, these compounds require repeated application and increase operational costs. Improper handling may lead to soil acidification, affecting microbial communities and crop productivity when manure is used as fertilizer (Banupriya et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017). Ammonia binders, including zeolites and alum compounds, act by trapping nitrogen within manure, reducing gaseous release. Despite their efficacy, binders do not address the underlying causes of ammonia formation, namely protein fermentation by gut microbes, and excessive use can alter nutrient content, reducing the agronomic value of manure (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016; Song et al., 2015).

Antimicrobial agents, such as sub-therapeutic antibiotics, have also been applied to control odor by suppressing odor-producing bacteria. However, their use poses serious challenges, including the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, regulatory restrictions, and consumer preference for antibiotic-free products (Dibner & Richards, 2005; Dahiya et al., 2006). These limitations have created an urgent need for sustainable, biologically driven solutions that address odor formation at its root rather than merely masking the symptom.

3.2 Probiotics: A Natural and Effective Alternative

Probiotics offer a holistic approach to odor control by modulating gut microbiota, enhancing nutrient absorption, and limiting the proliferation of odor-causing microbes (Fuller, 1989; Patterson & Burkholder, 2003). Unlike chemical additives, probiotics work biologically to improve protein digestion, minimize nitrogenous waste, and reduce ammonia formation in manure (Song et al., 2015; Mallo et al., 2017). Lactobacillus-based probiotics, for instance, acidify the intestinal environment, inhibiting ammonia-producing bacteria such as Clostridium while promoting beneficial lactic acid bacteria (Lan et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016). Similarly, Bacillus-based probiotics produce digestive enzymes that break down proteins and other complex feed components more efficiently, ensuring fewer undigested substrates reach the ceca where odor-producing bacteria thrive (Mallo et al., 2017; Song et al., 2015).

In addition to reducing ammonia, certain probiotics can degrade volatile sulfur compounds like hydrogen sulfide. Sulfate-reducing bacteria are competitively suppressed when probiotics metabolize sulfur-containing compounds into non-odorous metabolites, providing a more targeted, long-lasting odor control mechanism than chemical neutralizers (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014; Lan et al., 2016). Probiotics also promote short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, including butyrate, which stabilizes gut microbial communities, enhances intestinal health, and indirectly reduces substrates for odor-causing microbial fermentation (Wang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2016).

3.3 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Probiotics

Beyond odor mitigation, probiotics offer substantial environmental and economic advantages in poultry production. Enhanced nutrient utilization improves feed conversion ratios, reducing feed costs and minimizing nitrogen excretion (Song et al., 2015; Lan et al., 2016). Lower nitrogen waste directly decreases ammonia emissions, contributing to better air quality and improved worker and bird health (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2013).

Environmentally, probiotics reduce the risks associated with chemical additives. Unlike acidifiers or ammonia binders, they do not alter soil pH or disrupt nutrient cycling. Probiotic-fed birds produce manure with more stable organic matter and reduced odor, making it a more valuable fertilizer (Mallo et al., 2017; Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014). The reduction in ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions also decreases atmospheric and water pollution risks, supporting sustainable waste management practices and compliance with environmental regulations (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016).

Economically, probiotics align with consumer preferences for natural and antibiotic-free poultry products. As regulatory frameworks increasingly restrict antibiotic use, probiotic supplementation provides a compliant solution that meets market demands (Dibner & Richards, 2005; Dahiya et al., 2006). Producers adopting probiotic-based odor control strategies may also experience improved brand reputation, increased consumer trust, and better market positioning (Fuller, 1989; Gaggia et al., 2010).

3.4 Challenges and Future Considerations

Despite their benefits, probiotics present challenges that must be addressed to optimize their application in commercial poultry farming. Their effectiveness depends on strain selection, dosage, administration method, and interactions with the host’s gut microbiota (Mallo et al., 2017; Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Multi-strain probiotic formulations often provide broader benefits than single strains due to synergistic activity, yet research is needed to identify optimal strain combinations for odor mitigation (Lan et al., 2016; Song et al., 2015).

Farm-specific variables, including diet composition, housing systems, temperature, humidity, and manure management practices, influence probiotic performance. Customizing probiotic formulations to match local conditions is essential to maximize effectiveness (Zhao et al., 2013; Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014). Long-term studies are also necessary to evaluate the consistency of probiotic effects over multiple production cycles, different breeds, and diverse management systems (Mallo et al., 2017; Lan et al., 2016).

Regulatory and cost considerations further affect the adoption of probiotics. While generally recognized as safe (GRAS), probiotics’ classification as feed additives or health supplements can influence availability, pricing, and market acceptance (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016; Fuller, 1989). Support for research, farmer education, and demonstration of economic benefits will be critical in promoting widespread use.

3.5 Integration of Probiotics into Poultry Management Strategies

Effective probiotic-based odor management requires integration into a comprehensive farm strategy that includes feed optimization, housing management, and waste handling. Administering probiotics through feed or water, depending on the strain and desired effect, ensures adequate colonization of the gut microbiota (Mallo et al., 2017; Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Monitoring environmental factors, such as litter moisture and ventilation, can enhance probiotic efficacy by reducing microbial overgrowth and improving overall barn hygiene (Song et al., 2015; Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014).

Furthermore, combining probiotics with other natural interventions, such as organic acids, prebiotics, and plant-derived feed additives, may provide synergistic benefits. Organic acids can reduce pH and enhance probiotic survival, while prebiotics stimulate beneficial bacteria and improve SCFA production, together promoting a healthier gut environment and reducing odor (Abdelrazek et al., 2016; Banupriya et al., 2016).

Table 2: Impact of Probiotics on Poultry Manure Odor Emissions

4. The Impact of Probiotics on Poultry Manure Composition and Odor Emissions

Poultry manure is a valuable agricultural resource, often used as organic fertilizer due to its rich nutrient content. However, the decomposition of poultry waste generates unpleasant odors and releases harmful gases, such as ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which contribute to air pollution and pose environmental and health hazards (Wang et al., 2017). The incorporation of probiotics into poultry diets has been increasingly recognized as a natural and effective strategy for altering manure composition, reducing odor emissions, and enhancing the sustainability of poultry waste management. This section explores the influence of probiotics on manure microbial composition, nutrient stability, and the reduction of odor-causing compounds.

4.1 Microbial Shifts in Poultry Manure Due to Probiotic Supplementation

The microbial profile of poultry manure plays a significant role in odor emissions. Pathogenic and opportunistic bacteria, such as Clostridium, Enterobacteriaceae, and sulfate-reducing bacteria, are responsible for producing ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014). When poultry are supplemented with probiotics, beneficial microbial strains such as Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Bifidobacterium begin to outcompete these odor-producing bacteria through competitive exclusion and microbial antagonism (Lan et al., 2016). Lactobacillus probiotics enhance lactic acid production, which lowers manure pH and creates an unfavorable environment for ammonia-producing bacteria (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Similarly, Bacillus species produce enzymes that improve feed digestion, ensuring less undigested protein reaches the manure, thereby reducing the substrate available for odor-causing fermentation (Song et al., 2015).

Mallo et al. (2017) demonstrated that broilers fed a probiotic-supplemented diet exhibited a significant reduction in Clostridium populations in their manure, associated with a 40% decrease in ammonia emissions compared to the control group. Wang et al. (2017) reported similar findings, showing that probiotic-fed layers produced manure with a more stable microbial profile, reducing both ammonia volatilization and the release of noxious gases.

4.2 Reduction of Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide Emissions

Ammonia is one of the most problematic gases emitted from poultry manure, contributing to respiratory issues in birds and farmworkers, as well as environmental acidification (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016). Ammonia is formed when uric acid and other nitrogenous compounds in manure are broken down by urease-producing bacteria. Probiotics mitigate ammonia emissions by:

• Enhancing Protein Digestion – Probiotics improve feed utilization, reducing undigested protein excreted in manure and limiting nitrogen available for ammonia production (Lan et al., 2016).
• Lowering Manure pH – Lactic acid-producing probiotics decrease manure pH, reducing urease enzyme activity (Song et al., 2015).
• Altering Microbial Populations – Probiotic strains compete with urease-producing bacteria, inhibiting their growth and reducing ammonia formation (Mallo et al., 2017).

Hydrogen sulfide is primarily produced by sulfate-reducing bacteria that break down sulfur-containing compounds. Probiotics help mitigate hydrogen sulfide production by promoting non-sulfate-reducing bacteria that utilize available sulfur for beneficial metabolic processes and by reducing fermentable substrates (Lan et al., 2016). Zhao et al. (2016) found that supplementing poultry diets with a combination of Lactobacillus and Bacillus probiotics resulted in a 35% reduction in hydrogen sulfide emissions compared to conventionally fed poultry.

4.3 Influence of Probiotics on Manure Nutrient Stability and Fertilizer Quality

Beyond odor reduction, probiotics enhance the nutrient stability of poultry manure, making it a more valuable organic fertilizer. Probiotic-fed poultry produce manure with:

• Higher Organic Matter Stability – Probiotics facilitate microbial fermentation that stabilizes organic matter, reducing rapid degradation and offensive odors (Wang et al., 2017).
• Improved Nitrogen Retention – By reducing ammonia volatilization, probiotics retain nitrogen as ammonium, improving fertilizing potential (Song et al., 2015).
• Balanced Microbial Activity – Probiotic-treated manure supports beneficial microbial communities that enhance soil fertility when applied as fertilizer (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014). Song et al. (2015) showed that manure from probiotic-fed poultry had a higher nitrogen-to-carbon ratio, improving its effectiveness as organic fertilizer while emitting significantly fewer odors. Probiotic supplementation also led to higher concentrations of beneficial microbial metabolites, such as organic acids, which improve soil microbial health.

4.4 Practical Implementation of Probiotic Strategies for Manure Management

For poultry farmers to maximize the benefits of probiotics in manure odor control, it is essential to implement best practices:

• Selecting the Right Probiotic Strains – Multi-strain probiotics including Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Bifidobacterium show the greatest impact on odor reduction and manure quality (Lan et al., 2016).
• Optimal Dosage and Administration – Probiotics should be incorporated into poultry diets at appropriate concentrations to ensure consistent microbial modulation (Mallo et al., 2017).
• Manure Management Techniques – Probiotic-fed manure should be composted under controlled conditions to further stabilize organic matter and minimize odor emissions (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016).

Probiotics play a vital role in transforming poultry manure composition and reducing odor emissions. By modulating manure microbial communities, probiotics suppress the growth of ammonia- and hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria, leading to improved air quality on poultry farms. Additionally, probiotic-fed manure retains more nitrogen and organic matter, making it a superior fertilizer compared to conventionally produced manure. With increasing pressure on poultry farmers to adopt sustainable waste management practices, probiotics provide an effective and environmentally friendly solution. Future research should focus on optimizing probiotic formulations and studying their long-term effects on manure quality and farm ecosystems.

5. Future Perspectives on Probiotics in Poultry Odor Control: Challenges and Opportunities

The growing recognition of probiotics as a sustainable solution for poultry odor control presents exciting opportunities for the poultry industry. By modulating gut microbiota, probiotics influence manure composition, reduce odor emissions, and improve nutrient stability, positioning them as a key component in environmentally friendly poultry production (Lan et al., 2016). However, there are challenges that must be addressed to ensure effective and widespread adoption. This section explores current research trends, regulatory considerations, practical challenges, and future directions in probiotic applications for managing poultry odor.

5.1 Advances in Probiotic Research for Odor Reduction

Recent advances in microbiome research have provided new insights into how probiotics influence gut health, manure composition, and odor emissions in poultry production. Novel probiotic strains with enhanced metabolic capabilities are being investigated to reduce ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions more effectively (Lan et al., 2016).

Key research trends in probiotic-based odor control include:

• Genetic Engineering of Probiotics – Scientists are exploring genetically modified probiotics designed to specifically target odor-causing bacteria in poultry manure. These engineered strains can outcompete harmful bacteria while producing beneficial metabolites that suppress odor formation (Wang et al., 2017).
• Microbial Consortia and Synbiotics – Combining multiple probiotic strains with prebiotics (non-digestible fibers that stimulate beneficial bacteria) has been shown to enhance probiotic efficiency. Synbiotics create a more stable gut microbiome, reducing nitrogen excretion and ammonia production (Chen et al., 2017).
• Fermented Feed Additives – Fermentation technology is being used to develop probiotic-based feed additives that pre-condition poultry digestive systems for odor control. Fermented probiotics improve gut fermentation, limiting undigested protein excretion (Hassan et al., 2016).
• Real-Time Monitoring of Odor-Associated Microbiomes – Advances in microbiome sequencing allow researchers to track changes in manure microbial populations in response to probiotic supplementation. This data-driven approach enables the development of precision probiotic formulations tailored to specific poultry operations (Zhao et al., 2016).

As research continues to refine probiotic formulations, poultry producers will have access to increasingly effective strategies for managing odor emissions while improving bird health and performance. These findings indicate that targeted microbial management can become a practical tool for odor mitigation on commercial farms (Song et al., 2015).

5.2 Regulatory and Economic Considerations in Probiotic Use

While probiotics offer promising solutions for poultry odor control, their widespread adoption is influenced by regulatory policies and economic feasibility. In many countries, probiotics are classified as feed additives and must undergo rigorous safety and efficacy evaluations before approval for commercial use (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016).

Key regulatory and economic factors affecting probiotic adoption include:

• Regulatory Approval Processes – Approval requirements vary by region, with some countries imposing strict guidelines on probiotic strains, dosages, and production methods. Farmers must navigate these regulations to ensure compliance and avoid legal challenges (Song et al., 2015).
• Cost-Effectiveness of Probiotic Supplementation – Although probiotics reduce odor emissions and improve manure quality, some farmers are hesitant due to perceived costs. However, long-term benefits, such as improved bird health, reduced antibiotic use, and enhanced manure value, may outweigh initial investment costs (Chen et al., 2017).
• Public Perception and Consumer Demand – Increasing consumer awareness of environmental sustainability and animal welfare is driving demand for poultry products produced using natural, probiotic-based feed additives. This shift in consumer preferences encourages more poultry producers to integrate probiotics into their operations (Lan et al., 2016).

• Competition with Conventional Odor Control Methods – Chemical additives and mechanical ventilation systems are commonly used for odor control, and some producers may be reluctant to switch to probiotic-based solutions without clear economic incentives (Wang et al., 2017).
• 5.3 Practical Challenges in Probiotic Implementation
• Despite the promising benefits of probiotics, several practical challenges must be addressed for their successful integration into commercial poultry production.
• Variability in Probiotic Strain Efficacy – Not all probiotic strains are equally effective in reducing odor emissions. The success of supplementation depends on factors such as strain selection, bird age, diet composition, and environmental conditions (Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor et al., 2014).
• Stability and Viability of Probiotics in Feed – Probiotics must remain viable during feed processing and storage. High temperatures, moisture content, and prolonged storage times can reduce probiotic effectiveness (Mallo et al., 2017).
• Integration with Existing Farm Management Practices – Farmers require clear guidelines on incorporating probiotics into feeding programs, manure management systems, and overall farm operations. Training and technical support are essential for optimizing use (Patterson & Lorenz, 2016).
• Long-Term Effects on Manure Composition and Soil Health – While probiotics improve manure quality, their long-term impact on soil microbial communities and nutrient cycling remains an area of ongoing research. Understanding these effects is critical for sustainable manure application practices (Chen et al., 2017).

5.4 Future Directions: Integrating Probiotics with Sustainable Poultry Farming

The future of probiotic-based odor control lies in its integration with broader sustainable poultry farming initiatives. As the industry shifts toward environmentally friendly practices, probiotics are likely to play a central role in reducing pollution, improving animal welfare, and enhancing farm profitability.

Potential future developments in probiotic applications include:

• Customized Probiotic Blends for Different Poultry Species – Tailoring formulations to broilers, layers, and turkeys could optimize odor control efficacy (Lan et al., 2016).
• Smart Probiotic Delivery Systems – Advances in encapsulation technology may improve stability and controlled release in feed, ensuring consistent gut colonization and manure modulation (Hassan et al., 2016).
• Integration with Precision Agriculture Technologies – Real-time monitoring of poultry house conditions, including air quality sensors and microbiome tracking, could help farmers adjust probiotic supplementation dynamically (Zhao et al., 2016).
• Development of Probiotic-Enhanced Bedding Materials – Researchers are exploring ways to incorporate probiotics into poultry bedding to directly influence manure decomposition and odor emissions (Wang et al., 2017).
• Expansion to Multi-Species Livestock Management – Similar probiotic strategies could be adapted for swine, cattle, and other livestock facing odor management challenges (Song et al., 2015).

By embracing these advancements, the poultry industry can move toward more sustainable, efficient, and community-friendly production systems that minimize environmental impact while maintaining productivity and profitability. The use of probiotics represents a paradigm shift toward sustainable livestock management. By modulating gut microbiota, reducing odor-causing bacteria, and improving manure nutrient stability, probiotics offer a natural, effective alternative to chemical additives and mechanical systems. Despite challenges such as strain variability, regulatory barriers, and economic considerations, continued research and technological innovation are paving the way for broader adoption in poultry production (Lan et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017; Song et al., 2015).

Table 3: Influence of Probiotics on Manure Nutrient Stability and Fertilizer Quality

6. Conclusion

The use of probiotics for poultry odor control is a promising and sustainable approach that aligns with modern agricultural practices focused on environmental stewardship, animal welfare, and economic viability. By modulating the gut microbiota, probiotics reduce the production of odor-causing compounds such as ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and volatile organic compounds in poultry manure. This not only enhances air quality within poultry houses but also benefits surrounding communities by minimizing nuisance odors. Furthermore, probiotic supplementation improves manure quality by promoting beneficial microbial activity, enhancing nutrient retention, and reducing harmful pathogens. As a result, manure treated with probiotics can serve as a more effective and environmentally friendly fertilizer, reducing the risks of soil and water pollution.Despite these advantages, several challenges must be addressed to maximize the potential of probiotics in poultry production. Variability in probiotic strain efficacy, regulatory constraints, and cost considerations remain significant barriers to widespread adoption. The stability and viability of probiotics during feed processing, storage, and administration also require further optimization to ensure consistent results. Additionally, poultry farmers must receive adequate training and technical support to effectively integrate probiotics into their management systems. Addressing these challenges will require collaborative efforts between researchers, policymakers, feed manufacturers, and poultry producers to develop standardized probiotic formulations, clear regulatory guidelines, and economic incentives for sustainable practices.

Looking ahead, the future of probiotic-based odor control lies in technological advancements such as genetically engineered probiotics, microbial consortia, and precision agriculture tools. Real-time microbiome monitoring and smart delivery systems could further enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of probiotic supplementation in poultry farms. Additionally, integrating probiotics with other sustainable farming practices, such as fermented feed additives and probiotic-enhanced bedding materials, could offer holistic solutions for odor control and overall farm productivity. As consumer demand for environmentally friendly and antibiotic-free poultry products continues to rise, the adoption of probiotics in poultry production will likely become a key differentiator for producers seeking to meet market expectations while maintaining sustainable and profitable operations.Probiotics represent a viable, natural, and effective solution for controlling poultry odor while simultaneously improving bird health and manure management. By overcoming existing challenges and leveraging emerging technologies, the poultry industry can successfully implement probiotic-based odor control strategies that benefit farmers, consumers, and the environment. The continued exploration of probiotic applications in poultry farming holds immense potential for revolutionizing odor management practices and promoting a more sustainable agricultural future.

References

Abdelrazek, H. M. A., Abuzead, S. M. M., Ali, S. A., El-Genaidy, H. M. A., & Abdel-Hafez, S. A. (2016). Effect of citric and acetic acid water acidification on broiler’s performance with respect to thyroid hormone levels. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 4, 271–278.

Baltic, B., Starcevic, M., Ðordevic, J., Mrdovic, B., & Markovic, R. (2017). Importance of medium chain fatty acids in animal nutrition. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Zvenigorod, Russia, 4–7 September 2017.

Banupriya, S., Kathirvelan, C., & Joshua, P. P. (2016). Significance of feed acidification in poultry feed. International Journal of Science and Environmental Technology, 5, 1596–1599.

Barrett, J. R. (2016). Poultry production and environmental concerns: Exploring the role of probiotics. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(5), A93–A96.

Benhabiles, M., Salah, R., Lounici, H., Drouiche, N., Goosen, M., & Mameri, N. (2012). Antibacterial activity of chitin, chitosan and its oligomers prepared from shrimp shell waste. Food Hydrocolloids, 29, 48–56.

Broom, L. (2015). Organic acids for improving intestinal health of poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 71, 630–642.

Burns, R., Moody, L., & Muhlbauer, R. (2009). Deep pit swine facility flash fires and explosions: Sources, occurrences, factors, and management. https://www.pork.org/research/deep-pit-swine-facility-flash-fires-and-explosions-sources-occurrences-factors-and-management/

Cheung, R. C. F., Wong, J. H., Pan, W. L., Chan, Y. S., Yin, C. M., Dan, X. L., Wang, H. X., Fang, E. F., Lam, S. K., Ngai, P. H. K., et al. (2014). Antifungal and antiviral products of marine organisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, 3475–3494.

Clanton, C. J., Schmidt, D. R., Nicolai, R. E., Goodrich, P. R., Jacobson, L. D., Janni, K. A., & Weisberg, S. (1999). Dynamic olfactometry variability in determining odors dilution to threshold. Transactions of the ASAE, 42, 1103–1112.

Dahiya, J. P., Wilkie, D. C., Van Kessel, A. G., & Drew, M. D. (2006). Potential strategies for controlling necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens in post-antibiotic era. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 129(1–2), 60–88.

Davidson, P. M., Taylor, T. M., & David, J. R. D. (2020). Antimicrobials in food. CRC Press.

Dibner, J. J., & Richards, J. D. (2005). Antibiotic growth promoters in agriculture: History and mode of action. Poultry Science, 84(4), 634–643.

 DooKashi. (2015). DooKashi for Poultry Bokashi Bran powered chicken coop deodorizer manure compost accelerator for all types of bedding and nesting.

Dörper, A., Veldkamp, T., & Dicke, M. (2020). Use of black soldier fly and house fly in feed to promote sustainable poultry production. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 6, 1–20.

El-Hack, M. A., Shafi, M., Alghamdi, W., Abdelnour, S., Shehata, A., Noreldin, A., Ashour, E., Swelum, A., Al-Sagan, A., Alkhateeb, M., et al. (2020). Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) meal as a promising feed ingredient for poultry: A comprehensive review. Agriculture, 10, 339.

Fabian-Wheeler, E. E., Hile, M. L., Murphy, D. J., Hill, D. E., Meinen, R., & Brandt, R. C., Elliott, H. A., & Hofstetter, D. (2017). Operator exposure to hydrogen sulfide from dairy manure storages containing gypsum bedding. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 23, 9–22.

Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 66(5), 365–378.

Gaggia, F., Mattarelli, P., & Biavati, B. (2010). Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141(S1), S15–S28.

Hossain, S., & Blair, R. (2007). Chitin utilisation by broilers and its effect on body composition and blood metabolites. British Poultry Science, 48, 33–38.

Ibitoye, E., Lokman, I., Hezmee, M., Goh, Y., Zuki, A., Jimoh, A., & Danmaigoro, A., Nicholas, N. P. (2019). Gut health and serum growth hormone levels of broiler chickens fed dietary chitin and chitosan from cricket and shrimp. Poultry Science, 98, 745–752.

Jacobson, L. D., Guo, H., Schmidt, D. R., Nicolai, R. E., Zhu, J., & Janni, K. A. (2005). Development of the offset model for determination of odor-annoyance-free setback distances from animal production sites: Part I. Review and experiment. Transactions of the ASAE, 48, 2259–2268.

Jadhao, G. M., Sawai, D. H., Rewatkar, H. N., Kolhe, R. P., Bansod, A. P., & Nandeshwar, J. D. (2019). Effect of organic acids with probiotic supplementation on immunity and blood biochemical status of broiler chicken. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8, 1952–1959.

Khan, S. H., & Iqbal, J. (2016). Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 44, 359–369.

Khempaka, S., Chitsatchapong, C., & Molee, W. (2011). Effect of chitin and protein constituents in shrimp head meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal microbial populations, volatile fatty acids, and ammonia production in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 20, 1–11.

Khempaka, S., Mochizuki, M., Koh, K., & Karasawa, Y. (2006). Effect of chitin in shrimp meal on growth performance and digestibility in growing broilers. Journal of Poultry Science, 43, 339–343.

Kreis, R. D. (1978). Control of animal production odors: The state-of-the-art (EPA Environmental Protection Technology Series, EPA-600/2-78-083). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Lan, P. T. N., Sakamoto, K., & Benno, Y. (2016). Effects of probiotic supplementation on intestinal microflora and odor emission in poultry farms. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 27(1), 302–310.

Lokman, I. H., Ibitoye, E. B., Hezmee, M. N. M., Goh, Y. M., Zuki, A. B. Z., & Jimoh, A. A. (2019). Effects of chitin and chitosan from cricket and shrimp on growth and carcass performance of broiler chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51, 2219–2225.

Mallo, J. J., Gracia, M. I., Honrubia, M. P., & Lazaro, R. (2017). Effect of dietary probiotics on growth performance and ammonia emissions in broilers. Livestock Science, 202, 58–62.

Mei, Y.-X., Dai, X.-Y., Yang, W., & Xu, X.-W., Liang, Y.-X. (2015). Antifungal activity of chitooligosaccharides against the dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 77, 330–335.

Michel, M. A., Revidatti, F. A., Fernández, R. J., Sindik, M. L., Sanz, P., Hernandez-Velasco, X., Latorre, J. D., Hargis, B. M., & Tellez-Isaias, G. (2019). Combination of a Lactobacillus-based probiotic and organic acids decrease egg to chick weight loss and reduce Salmonella spp. counts in the litter of commercial broiler breeders. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 10, 1011–1020.

Mulhausen, J. R., McJilton, C. E., Redig, P. T., & Janni, K. A. (1987). Aspergillus and other human respiratory disease agents in turkey confinement houses. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 48, 894–899.

Niu, S., Yang, L., Zuo, H., Zheng, J., Weng, S., He, J., & Xu, X. (2018). A chitinase from pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) involved in immune regulation. Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 85, 161–169.

O’Connor, A. M., Auvermann, B., Bickett-Weddle, D., Kirkhorn, S., Sargeant, J. M., Rameriez, A., & Von Essen, S. G. (2010). The association between proximity to animal feeding operations and community health: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 5, e9530.

O’Connor, A. M., Auvermann, B., Dzikamunhenga, R. S., Glanville, J. M., Higgins, J. P. T., Kirychuk, S. P., Sargeant, J. M., Totton, S. C., Wood, H., & Von Essen, S. G. (2017). Updated systematic reviews: Associations between proximity to animal feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. Systematic Reviews, 6, 86.

O’Neill, D. H., & Phillips, V. R. (1992). A review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part III, properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes or in the air around them. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 53, 23–50.

Ouwehand, A. C., Vesterlund, S., Salminen, S., & Holst, R. (2002). Probiotic and other functional microbes: From markets to mechanisms. Gut Microbes, 3(3), 201–207.

Patterson, J. A., & Burkholder, K. M. (2003). Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82(4), 627–631.

Patterson, J. A., & Lorenz, F. A. (2016). Probiotic regulation and application in animal feed. Journal of Animal Science, 94(S2), 76–85.

Rahman, H., Hjeljord, L. G., Aam, B. B., Sørlie, M., & Tronsmo, A. (2014). Antifungal effect of chitooligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerization. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 141, 147–158.

Sánchez, Á., Mengíbar, M., Rivera-Rodríguez, G., Moerchbacher, B., Acosta, N., & Heras, A. (2017). The effect of preparation processes on the physicochemical characteristics and antibacterial activity of chitooligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers, 157, 251–257.

Schiffman, S. S., Auvermann, B. W., & Bottcher, R. W. (2006). Health effects of aerial emissions from animal production and waste management systems. In J. M. Rice, D. F. Caldwell, & F. J. Humenik (Eds.), Animal agriculture and the environment: National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management White Papers (pp. 225–262). ASABE.

Schiffman, S. S., Bennett, J. L., & Raymer, J. H. (2001). Quantification of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 108, 213–240.

 Song, J., Xiao, K., Ke, Y. L., Jiao, L. F., Hu, C. H., & Kim, S. W. (2015). Dietary probiotics improve intestinal health and reduce ammonia emissions in broilers. Animal Science Journal, 86(5), 585–593.

Sweeten, J. M., Jacobson, L. D., Heber, A. J., Schmidt, D. R., Lorimor, J. C., Westerman, P. W., Miner, J. R., Zhang, R. H., Williams, C. M., & Auvermann, B. W. (2006). Odor mitigation for concentrated animal feeding operations: White paper and recommendations. In J. M. Rice, D. F. Caldwell, & F. J. Humenik (Eds.), Animal agriculture and the environment: National Center for Manure and Animal Waste Management White Papers (pp. 721–758). ASABE.

Tabata, E., Kashimura, A., Kikuchi, A., Masuda, H., Miyahara, R., Hiruma, Y., Wakita, S., Ohno, M., Sakaguchi, M., Sugahara, Y., et al. (2018). Chitin digestibility is dependent on feeding behaviors, which determine acidic chitinase mRNA levels in mammalian and poultry stomachs. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–11.

Van Der Hoeven-Hangoor, E., Van De Linde, I. B., Paton, J. C., & Veldman, A. (2014). Probiotics reduce fecal ammonia emissions in poultry production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 80(4), 1350–1357.

Wang, S., Zhang, H., Wang, H., & Qin, G. (2017). Probiotic supplementation reduces odor emissions from broiler litter. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 52(9), 722–730.

Zahn, J. A., DiSpirito, A. A., Do, Y. S., Brooks, B. E., Cooper, E. E., & Hatfield, J. L. (2001). Correlation of human olfactometry responses to airborne concentrations of malodorous volatile organic compounds emitted from swine effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 624–634.

Zhao, P. Y., Kim, I. H., & Mateos, G. G. (2016). Effects of probiotics on growth performance, gut health, and fecal gas emission in poultry. Journal of Poultry Science, 53(1), 1–9.

Zhao, Y., Xin, X., Shepherd, T. A., Hayes, M. D., & Stinn, J. P. (2013). Thermal environment, ammonia concentrations, and ammonia emissions of aviary houses with white laying hens. Transactions of the ASABE, 56, 1145–1156.