Microbial Bioactives

Microbial Bioactives | Online ISSN 2209-2161
380
Citations
256.7k
Views
185
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
REVIEWS   (Open Access)

Advancements in Microbiome Analysis of Pathogenic Microorganisms: From Culture-Dependent Methods to Integrated Meta-Omics Approaches

Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Limitations 6. Conclusion Author Contributions References

Jegathambigai Rameshwar Naidu 1, Mahfoudh A.M. Abdulghani 2*

+ Author Affiliations

Microbial Bioactives 6 (1) 1-13 https://doi.org/10.25163/microbbioacts.6110673

Submitted: 17 March 2023 Revised: 14 May 2023  Accepted: 21 May 2023  Published: 23 May 2023 


Abstract

The study of microbiomes and their associated pathogens has changed remarkably over the last decade, moving far beyond the limitations of traditional culture-based microbiology. Earlier approaches captured only a very small portion of microbial diversity, leaving much of the microbial world unexplored and, in many cases, misunderstood. This review synthesizes current advances in microbiome analysis, with particular emphasis on high-throughput sequencing, integrated meta-omics, and modern bioinformatic pipelines used for pathogen detection across marine, terrestrial, and extreme ecosystems. Evidence gathered from recent studies suggests that second- and third-generation sequencing technologies have substantially improved taxonomic resolution, functional prediction, and real-time microbial surveillance. Approaches such as metabarcoding, shotgun metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics now provide a more dynamic understanding of microbial activity rather than simple presence–absence observations. The review also highlights the importance of high-fidelity sampling systems, including pressure-retaining and in situ fixation devices, which preserve native microbial structure and reduce post-sampling bias. Quantitative molecular tools such as qPCR, droplet digital PCR, and CARD-FISH further enhance detection sensitivity and ecological interpretation. Despite these advances, methodological heterogeneity, primer bias, incomplete reference databases, and variability in sequencing depth remain important challenges. Overall, this review demonstrates how integrated meta-omics and advanced sequencing technologies are reshaping pathogen monitoring, ecological prediction, and microbiome research across diverse environmental systems.

Keywords: Microbiome analysis; high-throughput sequencing; shotgun metagenomics; meta-omics; pathogen detection; marine microbiology; bioinformatics

References

Aragona, M., Cacciola, S. O., Pane, A., & Magnano di San Lio, G. (2022). New-generation sequencing technology in the diagnosis of fungal plant pathogens. Journal of Fungi, 8(7), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070737

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Bozcal, E.; Dagdeviren, M. Bacterial metagenome analysis of Mytilus galloprovincialis collected from Istanbul and Izmir coastal stations of Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 186.

Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., & Holmes, S. P. (2016). DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods, 13, 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869

Chang, J. J., Ip, Y. C. A., Ng, C. S. L., & Huang, D. (2020). Takeaways from mobile DNA barcoding with BentoLab and MinION. Genes, 11(10), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101121

DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Edgcomb, V. P., Orsi, W., Bunge, J., Jeon, S., Christen, R., Leslin, C., Holder, M., Taylor, G. T., Suarez, P., & Varela, R. (2016). Comparison of Niskin vs. in situ approaches for analysis of gene expression in deep-sea microbial communities. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 129, 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.10.020

Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Figueras, A., Moreira, R., Sendra, M., & Novoa, B. (2019). Genomics and immunity of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 90, 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.04.064

He, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Xiao, X. (2023). A novel submersible-mounted sediment pressure-retaining sampler for deep-sea microbiological research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1154269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1154269

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 6.3). Cochrane. http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Huang, Z., Zhang, X., Li, J., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Technological advancements in field investigations of marine microorganisms. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11, 1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11101981

Hupfauf, S., Winkler, M., Wagner, A. O., Podmirseg, S. M., & Insam, H. (2020). CoMA—An intuitive pipeline for amplicon sequencing data analysis. PLOS ONE, 15, e0243241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243241

Kim, T. G., Jeong, S. Y., & Cho, K. S. (2014). Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative PCR for quantification of bacteria in soil. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, 6105–6113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5794-4

Knight, R., Callewaert, C., Marotz, C., Hyde, E. R., Debelius, J. W., McDonald, D., & Sogin, M. L. (2018). Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 16, 410–422.  DOI: 10.1038/s41579-018-0029-9

Landa, B. B., Montes-Borrego, M., Muñoz-Ledesma, F. J., Jiménez-Díaz, R. M., & Castillo, P. (2021). Diversity of Phytophthora species in British soils assessed using high-throughput sequencing. Forests, 12(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020229

Li, L. L., Wang, Y., Cai, L., Li, Y., Chen, X., & He, L. (2020). Impacts of microplastics exposure on gut microbiota of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Science of the Total Environment, 745, 141018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141018

Liu, S., Vijayendran, D., & Bonning, B. C. (2011). Next generation sequencing technologies for insect virus discovery and analysis. Viruses, 3, 1849–1869. https://doi.org/10.3390/v3101849

Maestri, S., Cosentino, E., Paterno, M., Freitag, H., Garces, J. M., Marcolungo, L., Alfano, M., Njunjic, I., Schilthuizen, M., Slik, J. W. F., Menegon, M., & Rossato, M. (2019). A rapid and accurate MinION-based DNA barcoding pipeline for species biodiversity assessment. Genes, 10, 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10060468

McLennan, K., Hinder, S. L., Brown, M. R., & Davidson, K. (2021). Assessing molecular barcoding and qPCR approaches for detecting Prorocentrum minimum. Microorganisms, 9(3), 510. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030510

Nilsson, R. H., Anslan, S., Bahram, M., Wurzbacher, C., Baldrian, P., & Tedersoo, L. (2019). Mycobiome diversity: High-throughput sequencing and identification of fungi. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 17, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0116-y

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Page, T. M., & Lawley, J. W. (2022). A review of transcriptomic approaches in marine ecology. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 757921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.757921

Quince, C., Walker, A. W., Simpson, J. T., Loman, N. J., & Segata, N. (2017). Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 35, 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3935

Sam, Q. H., Chang, M. W., & Chai, L. Y. A. (2017). The fungal mycobiome and its interaction with gut bacteria. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(2), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020330

Schoenle, A., Hohlfeld, M., Hermanns, K., & Arndt, H. (2016). Estimates of heterotrophic flagellates from the deep-sea floor. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 4, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse4010022

Schoinas, K., Giannoulis, A., Louvrou, I., & Kormas, K. A. (2023). Microbiome profile of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Diversity, 15(3), 463. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030463

Semenov (2021): Semenov, M.V. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics in Soil Ecology Research: Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2021, 11, 40–53.

Vargas-Gastélum, L., & Riquelme, M. (2020). The mycobiota of the deep sea. Life, 10(11), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10110292

Velasco-González, I., González, M. C., & Santos-Guerra, A. (2023). Pathogenic eukaryotic microorganisms inhabiting mountain rocks. Diversity, 15(5), 594. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050594

Winand, R., Bogaerts, B., Hoffman, S., Lefevre, L., Delvoye, M., Van Braekel, J., Fu, Q., Roosens, N. H., De Keersmaecker, S. C., & Vanneste, K. (2020). Targeting the 16S rRNA gene for bacterial identification in complex mixed samples: Comparative evaluation of second (Illumina) and third (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) generation sequencing technologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(1), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010298    

Wydro, U. (2022). Soil microbiome study based on DNA extraction: A review. Water, 14(24), 3999. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14243999


Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
260
Views
📖 Cite article

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



0
Save
0
Citation
260
View
0
Share