A Mixed-Methods Study on Occupational Health, Safety Compliance, and Labor Practices
Md. Mesbaul Haque 1*, Laboni Khatun 2, ASM Amanullah 2, A.B.S Mahbubar Rahman 3
Business and Social Sciences 3 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/business.3110374
Submitted: 29 June 2025 Revised: 31 August 2025 Published: 02 September 2025
Abstract
Background: Occupational health and safety (OHS) is a critical component of worker protection in Bangladesh’s construction sector, which relies heavily on manual labor. Despite regulatory frameworks such as the Bangladesh Labour Act (2006) and the Bangladesh National Building Code (2006), inconsistent implementation, limited safety training, and inadequate protective measures leave workers exposed to hazards including falls, electrocution, and machinery accidents. Understanding current practices and compliance gaps is essential for improving workplace safety and labor equity.
Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach to evaluate OHS practices across three major construction projects in Dhaka: the Dhaka Elevated Expressway, MRT Line-6, and the Dhaka City Neighborhood Upgradation Project. Primary data were collected from 50 participants via structured surveys, three focus group discussions, and six key informant interviews with contractors and project authorities. Secondary data were gathered from official reports, project documents, and literature. Quantitative analysis provided measurable compliance indicators, while qualitative data captured perceptions of workplace safety, fair treatment, and labor management.
Results: Findings indicate a mixed compliance scenario. While 60% of workers received formal wage orders and 70% reported equal pay for equal work, only 10% had leave entitlements and 40% lacked overtime compensation. Safety training covered 70% of workers, first aid was available to 90%, yet preventive safety measures and task-specific training were largely absent. Multinational contractors generally demonstrated higher compliance, whereas national contractors, particularly at DCNUP, showed significant gaps in procedural and preventive practices. Gender disparities were evident, with women concentrated in lower-income roles and experiencing pay inequities.
Conclusion: Although awareness of OHS and labor rights is improving, critical gaps remain in leave, pay equity, preventive safety measures, and task-specific training. Strengthening policy enforcement, promoting gender-sensitive labor practices, and investing in proactive safety measures are essential to protect workers and enhance productivity in Bangladesh’s construction sector.
Keywords: Occupational Health and Safety, Construction Workers, Labor Rights, Workplace Safety, Policy Implementation, Gender Equity, Bangladesh.
References
Bangladesh Labor Act. (2006). Bangladesh Labour Act 2006. Government of Bangladesh.
Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC). (2006). Bangladesh National Building Code 2006. Government of Bangladesh.
BILS. (n.d.). Occupational safety and health in Bangladesh: National profile. Bangladesh Institute of Labour Studies.
DMTCL (Dhaka Mass Transit Company Limited). (n.d.). Project information. http://dmtcl.gov.bd/site/page/9385ace9-1fc3-4e67-9180-92efbe3af9dd/-
Galib, S. A., Kabir, M. H., Abdullah, S., & Khan, M. (2019). A study on the occupational safety and health in perspective of disaster management approach: Research on the Ready-Made Garments sector of Bangladesh (pp. 196–218). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3545009
Hossain, M. M., & Ahmed, S. (2019). The status of construction safety in Bangladesh: Challenges, benefits, effects and suggestions. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction, 8(4), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.32732/jcec.2019.8.4.175
IFC. (2006). Performance Standard 2: Labor and working conditions. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/policies-standards/performance-standards/ps2
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2013). Bangladesh Labour (Amendment) Act No. 30 of 22 July 2013 (Unofficial English translation). https://natlex.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/fe/details?p3_isn=94286
Olsson, N. (2011). Praktisk rapportskriving. Tapir Akademisk.
Qasim, M., Bashir, A., Malik, M., Anees, M., Ghani, U., Khalid, M., & Hasan, F. (2014). Concept of occupational health and safety and evaluation of awareness level among employees. World Applied Sciences Journal, 32, 904–909. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.32.05.81132
Rahimi, M. (1995). Merging strategic safety, health and environment into total quality management. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 16(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00074-D
Robson, L., Clarke, J., Cullen, K., Bielecky, A., Severin, C., Bigelow, P., Irvin, E., Culyer, A., & Mahood, Q. (2007). The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review. Safety Science, 45(3), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003
South Australia Government. (n.d.). Occupational health, safety and welfare regulations 1995. https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/__legislation/lz/c/r/occupational%20health%20safety%20and%20welfare%20regulations%201995/2010.08.31/1995.12.un.pdf
The Daily Star. (2017, October 15). Ensuring construction safety in Bangladesh. https://www.thedailystar.net/round-tables/ensuring-construction-safety-bangladesh-1475314
World Bank. (n.d.-a). Bangladesh: Dhaka City Neighborhood Upgrading Project. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/loans-credits/2019/03/29/bangladesh-dhaka-city-neighborhood-upgrading-project
World Bank. (n.d.-b). Environmental and social standards (ESS). https://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/environmental-and-social-framework/brief/environmental-and-social-standards
World Bank. (n.d.-c). Project document: P165477. https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/document-detail/P165477?type=projects
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.