Biosensors and Nanotheranostics
Single-Entity Electrochemistry for Ultrasensitive Molecular Diagnosis: Collision Dynamics, CRISPR Nanointerfaces, and Clinical Translation
Yee Mun Oon 1* Aya Elfiki 2
Biosensors and Nanotheranostics 5 (1) 1-18 https://doi.org/10.25163/biosensors.5110985
Submitted: 19 January 2026 Revised: 06 March 2026 Accepted: 15 March 2026 Published: 17 March 2026
Abstract
Most electrochemical biosensors still report an average. The current recorded at a conventional electrode sums the behaviour of millions of nanoparticles or molecules, and in doing so it conceals the particle-to-particle differences in size, catalytic activity and interfacial kinetics that often decide whether a scarce biomarker is detected at all. Single-entity electrochemistry, which follows the stochastic collisions of individual nanoparticles with an ultramicroelectrode, offers a route around this averaging and is now moving from physical chemistry into molecular diagnostics. This review traces that transition. We first describe the transduction modes that underpin nano-impact measurements: catalytic spikes, adsorptive staircase steps and blocking events, alongside the edge effects and filtering artefacts that complicate their interpretation. We then examine how signal amplification has been rebuilt around the single-entity principle, from one-to-many nuclease recycling that liberates tens of millions of catalytic reporters per target to in-electrode Faraday cage-type architectures that bring every label into the electron-transfer zone. A third strand concerns CRISPR-Cas systems, whose programmable trans-cleavage has been paired with tetrahedral DNA scaffolds, hairpin-decorated magnetic beads and PAM-free strand-displacement circuits. Across the platforms compared, reported detection limits reach the attomolar to low-femtomolar range for microRNAs and viral RNA and sub-nanomolar levels for mercuric ions. Performance in serum, urine and food matrices is encouraging, though less consistent, and depends on antifouling chemistry and magnetic separation. We close by weighing the obstacles that still limit translation, including biofouling, fabrication reproducibility and signal deconvolution, and the extent to which microfluidic automation and machine learning may resolve them.
Keywords: single-entity electrochemistry; nano-impact; ultramicroelectrode; CRISPR-Cas12a; signal amplification; Faraday cage-type biosensor; molecular diagnostics; point-of-care testing
References
Anderson, T. J., & Zhang, B. (2016). Single-nanoparticle electrochemistry through immobilization and collision. Accounts of Chemical Research, 49(11), 2625–2631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00334
Arab, N., Salis, A., Hosseini, M., Xu, G., & Fotouhi, L. (2027). In-electrode faraday cage-type biosensors: Enclosing biorecognition for ultra-sensitive electrochemical and electrochemiluminescence detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 315, 119221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2026.119221
Bai, Y.-Y., Wu, Z., Xu, C.-M., Zhang, L., Feng, J., Pang, D.-W., & Zhang, Z.-L. (2020). One-to-many single entity electrochemistry biosensing for ultrasensitive detection of microRNA. Analytical Chemistry, 92(1), 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03492
Chen, X., et al. (2021). MXene-catalyzed Faraday cage-type electrochemiluminescence immunosensor for sensitive detection of Cry1Ab protein. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 185, 113264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113264
Cheng, W., & Compton, R. G. (2014). Electrochemical detection of nanoparticles by ‘nano-impact’ methods. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 58, 79–89.
Dong, J., Li, X., Hu, W., Liu, M., Hou, C., Hou, J., Yang, M., & Huo, D. (2024). A universal electrochemical biosensor based on CRISPR/Cas12a and a DNA tetrahedron for ultrasensitive nucleic acid detection. Chemical Communications, 60(50), 6667–6670. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cc01646g
Duan, M., Li, B., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Dai, R., Li, X., & Jia, F. (2023). A CRISPR/Cas12a-mediated, DNA extraction and amplification-free, highly direct and rapid biosensor for Salmonella Typhimurium. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 219, 114823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114823
Ganesh, A., Aruchamy, G., Park, K., & Kim, B. K. (2025). One-step process for ultrasensitive detection of mercuric ions using nanoparticle formation and single-entity electrochemistry. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5054670. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5054670
Hu, H., Ye, Z., Zhang, L., et al. (2026). A PAM-free and universal CRISPR-Cas12a activation model for hyper-sensitive DNA methylation detection. Chinese Chemical Letters, 37, 111184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111184
Jalili, F., & Jalalvand, A. R. (2023). A novel and intelligent molecularly imprinted enzymatic biosensor for biosensing of human serum albumin in the presence of gamma-globulin, and glucose as uncalibrated interference. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 42, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2023.100590
Ji, S., & Koh, H. R. (2023). Single-molecule assay for highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 gene detection based on CRISPR-Cas12a. Biophysical Journal, 122(3), 372a–373a.
Kanokkanchana, K., & Tschulik, K. (2022). Electronic circuit simulations as a tool to understand distorted signals in single-entity electrochemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 13(43), 10120–10125.
Lee, J.-C., Ryu, S.-M., Lee, Y., Jang, H., Song, J., Kang, T., Lee, K. H., & Park, S. (2024). CRISPR/Cas12a antifouling nanocomposite electrochemical biosensors enable amplification-free detection of monkeypox virus in complex biological fluids. Nanoscale, 16(24), 11318–11326. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nr01211d
Liang, H., Chen, C., Zeng, J., Zhou, M., Wang, L., Ning, G., Duan, Q., Han, R., Liu, H., Zhao, H., & Li, C.-P. (2022). Dual-signal electrochemical biosensor for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin based on MXene-polyaniline and Cu-MOF/single-walled carbon nanohorn nanostructures. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 5(11), 16774–16783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c03821
Lu, L., Zhang, H., Lin, F., Zhou, L., Zhu, Z., & Yang, C. (2023). Sensitive and automated detection of bacteria by CRISPR/Cas12a-assisted amplification with digital microfluidics. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 381, 133409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133409
Mu, X., Li, J., Xiao, S., Xu, J., Huang, Y., Zhao, S., & Tian, J. (2023). Peroxidase-mimicking DNA-Ag/Pt nanoclusters mediated visual biosensor for CEA detection based on rolling circle amplification and CRISPR/Cas12a. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 375, 132870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132870
Natarajan, B., Kannan, P., Subramanian, P., & Maduraiveeran, G. (2024). Recent developments of nanostructured electrochemical biosensors for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as acute kidney injury biomarker. Microchemical Journal, 203, 110890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2024.110890
Nie, X., et al. (2022). Single-atom Au/MXene heterostructure-based Faraday cage-type electrochemiluminescence platform for microRNA detection. Analytical Chemistry, 94(12), 5120–5128. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05421
Pourbahram, B., Hosseini, M., & Xu, G. (2025). Highly sensitive electrochemical aptasensor based on nanoporous gold for detection of VEGF165. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 47, 100766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2024.100766
Schoch, L., Preska, R., Ban, D. K., & Aran, K. (2026). CRISPR-integrated electrochemical biosensors for precision molecular diagnostics. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 56, 101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2025.101813
Shateri, F., Hosseini, M., Dadmehr, M., & Sabahi, H. (2026). Oligonucleotides protected metal nanoclusters for biosensing and biomedical applications. Results in Chemistry, 29, 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.103717
Shi, K., Yi, Z., Han, Y., Chen, J., Hu, Y., Cheng, Y., Liu, S., Wang, W., & Song, J. (2023). PAM-free cascaded strand displacement coupled with CRISPR-Cas12a for amplified electrochemical detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Analytical Biochemistry, 664, 115046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2023.115046
Sokolov, S. V., Eloul, S., Kätelhön, E., Batchelor-McAuley, C., & Compton, R. G. (2017). Electro-particle impacts: A user's guide. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 19(1), 28–43.
Taghdisi, S. M., Danesh, N. M., Ramezani, M., Alibolandi, M., Nameghi, M. A., & Abnous, K. (2022). A highly sensitive fluorescent aptasensor for detection of prostate specific antigen using CRISPR-Cas12a and cruciform DNA structure. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1219, 340031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.340031
Wang, W., & Tao, N. (2015). Detection and imaging of single nanoparticles and single chemical reactions. Analytical Chemistry, 87(1), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac503636b
Xu, Y., Chen, J., Sui, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, A., Lin, Z., Liu, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Ultra-sensitive electrochemiluminescent biosensor for miRNA based on CRISPR/Cas13a trans-cleavage-triggered hybridization chain reaction and magnetic-assisted enrichment. Microchimica Acta, 190(10), 393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-023-05962-1
Zhang, X., Li, H., Zhao, W., Xu, J., Wang, S., & Yu, R. (2023). Development of a separation platform comprising magnetic beads combined with the CRISPR/Cas12a system enabling ultrasensitive and rapid detection of miRNA-21. Microchimica Acta, 190(11), 458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-023-06038-w
Zhao, C., Du, L., Jiang, D., Hu, J., & Hou, X. (2025). Regulating CRISPR-Cas12a trans-cleavage on the hairpin DNA–MB nanointerface for enhanced multiplexed sensing application. Chemical Science, 16, 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc01759a
Zhou, Y., et al. (2023). Dual-mode fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and electrochemiluminescence cytosensor based on black phosphorus and MXene nanocomposites. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 222, 114980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114980