Biosensors and Nanotheranostics
Closed-Loop Nanotheranostic Systems: Biosensor-Triggered Insulin Release from Glucose-Responsive Nanogels
Sarah Stephenie John Sandanaraj 1*, Devyani Dogra 2, Chahat Antil 2
Biosensors and Nanotheranostics 5 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/biosensors.5110975
Submitted: 19 May 2026 Revised: 07 July 2026 Accepted: 15 July 2026 Published: 17 July 2026
Abstract
Insulin therapy has transformed diabetes from a fatal diagnosis into a manageable chronic condition, yet the way we deliver it has barely kept pace with how the disease actually behaves. Multiple daily injections and open-loop pump still ask patients to do, by hand and guesswork, what a healthy pancreas does continuously and without thought: match insulin output to a moving glucose target. The result is familiar—glycemic swings, injection fatigue, and the ever-present fear of hypoglycemia. This review examines an alternative that has matured rapidly over the past decade: closed-loop nanotheranostic systems in which glucose-responsive nanogels sense interstitial glucose and release insulin in proportion to it, with no human in the loop. We first dissect the three molecular recognition strategies that make such feedback possible—enzymatic oxidation by glucose oxidase, dynamic covalent binding by phenylboronic acid derivatives, and competitive displacement through lectins or glucose transporters—weighing each on kinetics, selectivity, and stability. We then trace how these chemistries are built into core–shell, dendrimer, and dual-crosslinked nanogel architectures, and how those materials are, in turn, embedded in microneedle patches and wearable biosensors to close the loop at the skin. Preclinical data are encouraging: single applications sustain normoglycemia for hours to days and resist glucose challenges without the rebound seen after bolus injection. What remains unresolved is translation—enzyme stability, boronate selectivity against competing diols, GMP-scale reproducibility, and the regulatory ambiguity of true drug–device combinations. The field, in short, has proven the concept and now faces the harder engineering.
Keywords: glucose-responsive nanogel; closed-loop insulin delivery; phenylboronic acid; glucose oxidase; microneedle patch; nanotheranostics; artificial pancreas
References
Abdoh, A., Imran, M., Al-Smadi, K., Kaur, H., Ali, M., Kumeria, T., & Mohammed, Y. (2026). Stimuli-responsive smart nanocarriers for skin drug delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 691, 126534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126534
Abdullahi, A. D., Ibrahim, M. A., & Serem, J. C. (2026). Peptide delivery in the management of diabetes: Exploring bioinspired nanoarchitectures using stimuli-responsive materials and supramolecular depots. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 701, 127169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2026.127169
Ahmad, Q., Mehdi, S., Shaukat, B., Siddique, R., Asif, M. T., Malik, A., Khan, S., Siddiqui, R., Khan, N. A., & Mehmood, M. H. (2026). Multi-stimuli responsive nanoparticles: Next-generation platforms for smart drug delivery. OpenNano, 29, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onano.2026.100296
Babinski, T. P., Peczek, S. H., Zago, A., Lorenzett, A. K., Ramos de Almeida, I., de Lima, V. A., & Mainardes, R. M. (2026). Global research trends and conceptual evolution in nanoparticle-based insulin delivery: A scientometric analysis (2015–2024). Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 124, 108624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2026.108624
Balasubramaniyam, S., Rathinam, T., Srinivasan, M., & Jayarani, S. (2025). Nanocarrier-based insulin delivery: A leap towards a needle-free future. Nano TransMed, 4, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntm.2025.100093
Bhairam, M., Shukla, S. S., Pandey, R. K., & Gidwani, B. (2026). Emerging frontiers of responsive nanomaterials in drug delivery systems: From design to clinical translation. OpenNano, 29, 100299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onano.2026.100299
Blagojevic, L., & Kamaly, N. (2025). Nanogels: A chemically versatile drug delivery platform. Nano Today, 61, 102645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2025.102645
Chen, X., Yu, H., Wang, L., Shen, D., & Hong, Y. (2023). Glucose-responsive microneedle patch with variable crosslinking density and flexible core–shell structure for insulin delivery. Advanced Materials Technologies, 8(10), 2202124. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202202124
Das, T., Dey, A., Singh, R., & Ghosh, S. (2025). Stimuli-responsive nanogels in wound care: A comprehensive review. Next Nanotechnology, 8, 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100260
Dmour, I., Muti, H., Al-Remawi, M., & Taha, M. O. (2026). Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles in 3D–4D printing for drug delivery: Practical considerations and challenges in clinical translation. OpenNano, 31, 100318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onano.2026.100318
Fu, Y., Liu, P., Chen, M., Jin, T., Wu, H., Hei, M., Wang, C., Xu, Y., Qian, X., & Zhu, W. (2022). On-demand transdermal insulin delivery system for type 1 diabetes therapy with no hypoglycemia risks. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 605, 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.07.126
Gholami, S., Zarkesh, I., Ghanian, M.-H., Hajizadeh-Saffar, E., Hassan-Aghaei, F., Mohebi, M.-M., & Baharvand, H. (2021). Dynamically capped hierarchically porous microneedles enable post-fabrication loading and self-regulated transdermal delivery of insulin. Chemical Engineering Journal, 421, 127823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127823
Hosseini Sharifabad, A., Behzad, T., & Salami-Kalajahi, M. (2026). Boronic acid-modified cellulose nanocrystal-cored poly(propylene imine) dendrimers as biocompatible glucose-responsive nanocarriers for intelligent insulin delivery and sensing. Advanced Sensor and Energy Materials, 5, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asem.2026.100179
Hu, X., Yu, J., Qian, C., Lu, Y., Kahkoska, A. R., Xie, Z., Jing, X., Buse, J. B., & Gu, Z. (2017). H2O2-responsive vesicles integrated with transcutaneous patches for glucose-mediated insulin delivery. ACS Nano, 11(1), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b06892
Kumar, G., Verma, N., Pathak, A., & Bhatia, D. (2026). Chitosan-based advanced biomaterials in diabetic ulcers: Healing mechanism, limitations, and future prospective. Carbohydrate Polymers, 379, 125005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2026.125005
Lakharwal, P., Sharma, A., Gupta, R., & Mehta, S. (2026). Smart nanomaterial-based therapeutics for the management of diabetes and its complications. Materials & Design, 264, 115805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115805
Lee, H., Choi, T. K., Lee, Y. B., Cho, H. R., Ghaffari, R., Wang, L., Choi, H. J., Chung, T. D., Lu, N., Hyeon, T., Choi, S. H., & Kim, D. H. (2016). A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nature Nanotechnology, 11(6), 566–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.38
Li, C., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Huang, F., Wu, G., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Ding, Y., Lv, J., Ma, R., An, Y., & Shi, L. (2019). Glucose and H2O2 dual-sensitive nanogels for enhanced glucose-responsive insulin delivery. Nanoscale, 11(18), 9163–9175. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr01103f
Luo, X., Yu, Q., Liu, Y., Gai, W., Ye, L., Yang, L., Cui, Y., & Yang, L. (2022). Closed-loop diabetes minipatch based on a biosensor and an electroosmotic pump on hollow biodegradable microneedles. ACS Sensors, 7(5), 1347–1360. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c02337
Ma, J., Feng, J., Zhang, X., Zou, Z., Li, Q., Lei, L., Dong, Z. Z., & Lin, Z. (2025). Beyond static scaffolds: Glucose-responsive hydrogels as dynamic intelligent platform for tissue engineering. Materials & Design, 258, 114635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114635
Martínez-Navarrete, M., Pérez-López, A., Guillot, A. J., Cordeiro, A. S., Melero, A., & Aparicio-Blanco, J. (2024). Latest advances in glucose-responsive microneedle-based systems for transdermal insulin delivery. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 263, 130301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130301
Moreno-Borrallo, A., Jiménez-Mancilla, N., Santos-Rebollo, C., & García-Salinas, S. (2026). Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanoparticles and nanocomposites for targeted glioblastoma therapy and diagnosis: Recent preclinical progress and translational challenges. Materials Today Advances, 31, 100885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2026.100885
Satapathy, T., Chandrakar, O., Satapathy, A., Sahu, P., Sahu, K., Patel, G., & Satapathy, A. (2026). Stimuli-responsive quantum-engineered polymeric networks: From molecular design and scalable manufacturing to high performance cargo loading systems. iPharma, 1, 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iphar.2026.100003
Sedighi, M., Shrestha, N., Mahmoudi, Z., Khademi, F., & Ghasemi, A. (2023). Glycopolypeptides in stimuli-responsive drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 354, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.043
Su, G.-L., Wang, Y., Chen, L., & Zhou, H. (2025). Recent advances in stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for periodontitis and chronic wound healing. Materials Today Bio, 32, 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101863
Suvarna, P., Kumar, A., Rao, S., & Menon, D. (2026). Computational approaches and 4D thermoresponsive materials for hydrogel design. Materials & Design, 266, 115973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115973
Yang, C., Sheng, T., Hou, W., Zhang, J., Cheng, L., Wang, H., Liu, W., Wang, S., Yu, X., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., & Gu, Z. (2022). Glucose-responsive microneedle patch for closed-loop dual-hormone delivery in mice and pigs. Science Advances, 8(43), eadd3197. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add3197
Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Ye, Y., DiSanto, R., Sun, W., Ranson, D., Ligler, F. S., Buse, J. B., & Gu, Z. (2015). Microneedle-array patches loaded with hypoxia-sensitive vesicles provide fast glucose-responsive insulin delivery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(27), 8260–8265. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505405112
Zhao, L., Xiao, C., Ding, J., He, P., Tang, Z., Pang, X., Zhuang, X., & Chen, X. (2013). Facile one-pot synthesis of glucose-sensitive nanogel via thiol-ene click chemistry for self-regulated drug delivery. Acta Biomaterialia, 9(5), 6535–6543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.040