1. Introduction
The ocean’s microscopic realm is home to staggering diversity, invisible to the naked eye yet deeply consequential to Earth’s life support systems. Among the myriad forms of marine life, microzooplankton (MZP) and hypersaline protists occupy critical ecological niches. These tiny eukaryotes drive nutrient recycling, influence food‑web dynamics, and play central roles in global carbon cycling. Despite their small size, they are architects of ecological stability and resilience (Caron et al., 2012; López‑Abbate, 2021). Yet the rapid pace of environmental change—driven by human activity—is rewriting the conditions in which they evolved. This systematic review and meta‑analysis synthesize evidence on how MZP and hypersaline protists respond to key global change hazards, revealing patterns, thresholds, and vulnerabilities that are essential to predicting future ocean function.
Microzooplankton are heterotrophic and mixotrophic plankton ranging between 20 and 200 µm in size, collectively grazing an immense portion of primary production and consuming an estimated 20–30 Pg C per year (Buitenhuis et al., 2010; Steinberg & Landry, 2017). Their ecological influence extends from surface waters to the deep sea, where grazing, respiration, and excretion shape the efficiency of both the biological and microbial carbon pumps (Polimene et al., 2016). Hypersaline protists, in contrast, inhabit extremes—salt lakes, salterns, microbial mats, and deep hypersaline anoxic basins (DHABs) where salinity regularly exceeds 10× that of normal seawater (Edgcomb & Bernhard, 2013; Wong et al., 2016). The survival strategies that allow life in such inhospitable environments provide unique insights into the limits of eukaryotic adaptation.
Environmental stressors of global significance—ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation, and eutrophication—do not act in isolation but interact in complex ways to shape protistan communities. These hazards emerge from anthropogenic climate change and nutrient enrichment, and their effects ripple through ecosystems in ways that are only beginning to be quantified (Bindoff et al., 2019; Diaz & Rosenberg, 2008). Synthesizing over a decade of research, including trait‑based studies, experimental manipulations, and in situ observations, reveals that the responses of microzooplankton and hypersaline protists to these stressors vary with physiology, life history, and community context. This synthesis explores directional patterns in growth, grazing, trophic coupling, and species composition under environmental stress, emphasizing areas of consensus and uncertainty.
Ocean warming is perhaps the most pervasive and well‑studied stressor. Temperature rises accelerate metabolic rates more in heterotrophic protists than in their phytoplankton prey (Rose & Caron, 2007; Wang et al., 2019), a pattern consistent with broader metabolic theory (MTE). However, MZP do not conform universally to canonical activation energies, because many species are mixotrophs that combine photosynthesis with predation, altering energy balance and ecological outcomes (Mitra et al., 2016). Experimental warming treatments show generally positive effects on growth and grazing rates across diverse taxa, increasing trophic coupling in some contexts, particularly in cooler regions where heterotrophs were once temperature‑limited (Aberle et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2012). Yet warming can also compress cell size spectra, shift bloom timing, and restructure seasonal dynamics, potentially decoupling prey–predator interactions (Franzè & Menden‑Deuer, 2020; Hinder et al., 2012). Species‑level responses, such as thermal niche tracking and poleward expansions observed in foraminifera and dinoflagellates, highlight the potential for community reassembly under future climates (Jonkers et al., 2019).
In contrast, ocean acidification appears to have comparatively neutral effects on many non‑calcifying microzooplankton groups under projected end‑of‑century scenarios (Suffrian et al., 2008; Nielsen et al., 2010). Where acidification effects emerge, they often do so indirectly via changes in phytoplankton prey quality or edibility rather than direct physiological stress (Meunier et al., 2017; Rossoll et al., 2012). This prey‑mediated risk suggests that trophic interactions, not acidification per se, will determine MZP outcomes in many regions. However, calcifying protists, such as certain foraminifera, are unequivocally sensitive to reduced carbonate saturation, exhibiting shell weight loss and inhibited growth under high pCO₂ (Moy et al., 2009; Beaufort et al., 2011). These contrasting responses highlight a key theme: the impact of acidification is taxon‑ and trait‑dependent.
Deoxygenation—the expansion of low‑oxygen zones—is another pressing hazard with disproportionate effects at the species level. Ciliates and other protists that occupy narrow oxygen niches exhibit reduced metabolism and altered behavior under hypoxia (Rocke & Liu, 2014; Edgcomb & Pachiadaki, 2014). Experimental and field studies show that hypoxic episodes lead to loss of diversity and functional shifts, particularly in stratified systems (Stauffer et al., 2013; Rocke et al., 2016). The response of MZP to deoxygenation underscores the importance of microhabitat structure and oxygen gradients in shaping community resilience.
Coastal eutrophication, though fueled by local nutrient inputs, interacts synergistically with climate stressors to affect water quality and trophic dynamics (Diaz & Rosenberg, 2008). Eutrophic systems often display weakened trophic coupling, as microzooplankton reach feeding saturation and fail to suppress massive phytoplankton blooms, even when abundant (Buskey, 2008; López‑Abbate et al., 2016). In addition, nutrient enrichment favors mixotrophic taxa that can leverage nutrient pulses to outcompete strict heterotrophs and autotrophs (Burkholder et al., 2008; Glibert & Burkholder, 2011). Despite this, the short generation times and functional redundancy of MZP confer a degree of ecosystem buffering, attenuating disturbance impacts across space and time (López‑Abbate, 2021; Wong et al., 2016).
Turning from the open ocean to hypersaline environments, the challenges of high ionic strength and low water activity (>0.72 aw) select for extraordinary physiological adaptations (Edgcomb & Bernhard, 2013; Brock et al., 1994). Hypersaline habitats support diverse protistan assemblages, including alveolates, stramenopiles, and fungi, often with little taxonomic overlap with typical marine communities (Alexander et al., 2009; Edgcomb et al., 2009; Stock et al., 2011). These organisms employ osmoadaptive strategies such as compatible solute accumulation (e.g., glycerol, glycine betaine) and proteome acidification to maintain cellular function under extreme salinity (Galinsky, 1993; Goh et al., 2011). Halophilic archaea such as Halococcus hamelinensis from Shark Bay exemplify these adaptations, accumulating solutes and modifying enzyme systems to offset osmotic stress (Goh et al., 2006; Gudhka et al., 2015).
Advances in molecular methods—especially metagenomics and single‑cell genomics—are illuminating the vast “microbial dark matter” of uncultured protists and archaea in hypersaline mats and DHABs (Rinke et al., 2013; Castelle et al., 2015). These technologies reveal lineages within the TACK and DPANN super‑phyla that were previously undetected, expanding our understanding of eukaryotic diversity and its functional potential (Guy & Ettema, 2011; Rinke et al., 2013). The revelation of such cryptic diversity underscores the limitations of traditional taxonomy and the need for high‑resolution tools to capture community complexity.
Synthesizing across hazard contexts—warming, acidification, deoxygenation, eutrophication, and extremes of salinity—reveals a recurring pattern: functional traits and environmental context matter more than taxonomic identity. Growth and grazing responses vary with thermal sensitivity, mixotrophic capacity, and oxygen tolerance; sensitivity to acidification correlates with calcification; and survival in hypersaline basins depends on specialized biochemical adaptations. These patterns suggest that predicting future dynamics requires a trait‑based framework that integrates physiology, environmental gradients, and trophic interactions.
In conclusion, microzooplankton and hypersaline protists are not merely passive indicators but active engineers of marine carbon and nutrient cycles. Their responses to global change hazards—from subtle shifts in metabolic balance to radical ecological reassembly—will shape the future of ocean ecosystems. This review consolidates evidence from experimental, observational, and molecular studies to build an integrated picture of stressor impacts, adaptation limits, and potential tipping points in marine microbial ecology.