Journal of Primeasia
Integrative Disciplinary Research | Online ISSN 3064-9870 | Print ISSN 3069-4353
570
Citations
220.6k
Views
147
Articles
REVIEWS (Open Access)
Biowaste-Derived Carbon Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Perspective on Fishery and Agricultural Residues
Anisul Islam Opy 1*
Journal of Primeasia 7 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.7110768
Submitted: 01 April 2026 Revised: 23 May 2026 Accepted: 04 June 2026 Published: 06 June 2026
Abstract
The valorization of biowaste into high-performance carbon materials has emerged as a promising strategy for sustainable electrochemical energy storage. Fishery and agricultural residues, which are abundant and underutilized, offer a renewable and environmentally friendly feedstock for the synthesis of heteroatom-doped porous carbons. These materials exhibit hierarchical pore structures, high surface areas, and enhanced electrochemical properties, making them suitable for lithium-ion, lithium–sulfur batteries, and supercapacitors. Despite the proliferation of experimental studies, the performance metrics of biowaste-derived carbons vary widely due to differences in precursor composition, processing methods, and electrochemical configurations. This systematic review and meta-analysis consolidate experimental data from fish-derived residues (scales, skins, bones, shells) and lignocellulosic agricultural residues (almond shells, crop stalks, fruit stones), evaluating their physicochemical characteristics, electrochemical performance, and sustainability potential. Quantitative synthesis highlights trends in reversible capacity, rate capability, and cycle stability, identifying the influence of precursor type, pore architecture, and heteroatom content. Findings indicate that fishery waste carbons can outperform conventional graphite anodes in lithium-ion systems, while agricultural residues serve as efficient sulfur hosts in lithium–sulfur batteries, mitigating polysulfide shuttling. Additionally, both waste sources enhance supercapacitor performance through high capacitance retention and power density. By providing a statistically grounded assessment of biowaste-derived carbon materials, this study informs future electrode design, promotes circular economy approaches, and underscores the potential of sustainable biomass for next-generation energy storage technologies.
Keywords: Biowaste, Fishery residues, Agricultural residues, Carbon materials, Lithium-ion batteries, Lithium–sulfur batteries, Supercapacitors, Energy storage, Sustainable materials
References
Ai, F., Liu, N., Wang, W., Wang, A., Wang, F., Zhang, H., & Huang, Y. (2017). Heteroatoms-doped porous carbon derived from tuna bone for high performance Li-S batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 258, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.076
Akridge, J. R., Mikhaylik, Y. V., & White, N. (2004). Li/S fundamental chemistry and application to rechargeable batteries. Solid State Ionics, 175(1–4), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.070
Anthony, L. S., Vasudevan, M., Perumal, V., Ovinis, M., Raja, P. B., & Edison, T. N. J. I. (2021). Bioresource-derived polymer composites for energy storage applications: Brief review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(5), 105832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105832
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018). The biomass distribution on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(25), 6506–6511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711842115
Benítez, A., González-Tejero, M., Caballero, Á., & Morales, J. (2018). Almond Shell as a Microporous Carbon Source for Sustainable Cathodes in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Materials, 11, 1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081428
Benítez, A., González-Tejero, M., Caballero, Á., & Morales, J. (2018). Almond shell as a microporous carbon source for sustainable cathodes in lithium-sulfur batteries. Materials, 11(8), 1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081428
Bresser, D., Passerini, S., & Scrosati, B. (2013). Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries. Chemical Communications, 49(97), 10545–10562. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc46131a
Chen, Z. H., Du, X. L., He, J. B., Li, F., Wang, Y., Li, Y. L., Li, B., & Xin, S. (2017). Porous coconut shell carbon offering high retention and deep lithiation of sulfur for lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9, 33855–33862. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b09310
Cheng, Y., Ji, S., Xu, X., & Liu, J. (2015). Wheat straw carbon matrix wrapped sulfur composites as a superior cathode for Li-S batteries. RSC Advances, 5, 100089–100096. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA21416E
Chulliyote, R., Hareendrakrishnakumar, H., Raja, M., Gladis, J. M., & Stephan, A. M. (2017). Sulfur-immobilized nitrogen and oxygen co-doped hierarchically porous biomass carbon for lithium-sulfur batteries: Influence of sulfur content and distribution on its performance. ChemistrySelect, 2, 10484–10495. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201702061
Demirbas, A. (2001). Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 42(11), 1357–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00137-0
Deng, J., Li, M., & Wang, Y. (2016). Biomass-derived carbon: Synthesis and applications in energy storage. Green Chemistry, 18(18), 4824–4854. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC01172A
Dos Reis, G. S., Larsson, S. H., de Oliveira, H. P., Thyrel, M., & Lima, E. C. (2020). Sustainable biomass activated carbons as electrodes for batteries and supercapacitors-A mini-review. Nanomaterials, 10(7), 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071398
Dutta, S., Bhaumik, A., & Wu, K. C. W. (2014). Hierarchically porous carbon derived from polymers and biomass. Energy & Environmental Science, 7(11), 3574–3592. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE01075B
Elizabeth, I., Singh, B. P., Trikha, S., & Gopukumar, S. (2016). Bio-derived hierarchically macro-meso-micro porous carbon anode for lithium/sodium ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 329, 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.106
Gao, M., Shih, C.-C., Pan, S.-Y., Chueh, C.-C., & Chen, W.-C. (2018). Advances and challenges of green materials for electronics and energy storage applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 6(42), 20546–20563. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA07246A
Guo, C., Hu, R., Liao, W., Li, Z., Sun, L., Shi, D., Li, Y., & Chen, C. (2017). Protein-enriched fish biowaste converted to three-dimensional porous carbon nano-network for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. Electrochimica Acta, 236, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.169
Guo, J., Zhang, J., Jiang, F., Zhao, S., Su, Q., & Du, G. (2015). Microporous carbon nanosheets derived from corncobs for lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 176, 853–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.077
Hernández-Rentero, C., Córdoba, R., Moreno, N., Caballero, A., Morales, J., Olivares-Marín, M., & Gómez-Serrano, V. (2018). Low-cost disordered carbons for Li/S batteries: A high-performance carbon with dual porosity derived from cherry pits. Nano Research, 11, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1608-1
Hussain, Z., Sardar, A., Khan, K. M., Naz, M. Y., Sulaiman, S. A., & Shukrullah, S. (2020). Construction of rechargeable protein battery from mixed-waste processing of fish scales and chicken feathers. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11(5), 2129–2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0535-z
Larcher, D., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2015). Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nature Chemistry, 7(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2085
Lian, X., Li, Q., Zhao, Y., Liu, S., Liu, H., & Zhang, H. (2018). The electrochemical properties of porous carbon derived from the prawn as anode for lithium ion batteries. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 13, 2474–2482. https://doi.org/10.20964/2018.03.33
Lionetto, F., & Esposito Corcione, C. (2021). Sorption studies of contaminants on microplastics in the marine environment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(4), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040445
Lionetto, F., Bagheri, S., & Mele, C. (2021). Sustainable materials from fish industry waste for electrochemical energy systems. Energies, 14(23), 7928. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237928
Liu, J., Liu, B., Wang, C., Huang, Z., Hu, L., Ke, X., Liu, L., Shi, Z., & Guo, Z. (2017). Walnut shell-derived activated carbon: Synthesis and its application in the sulfur cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 718, 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.206
Long, W.-Y., Fang, B.-Z., & Wilkinson, D. (2017). Biomass-derived nanostructured carbons as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Chemical Society Reviews, 46(23), 7176–7190. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00639F
Malmgren, A., & Riley, G. (2012). Biomass power generation. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-087872-0.00505-9
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. International journal of surgery, 8(5), 336-341.
Moreno, N., Caballero, A., Hernan, L., & Morales, J. (2014). Lithium-sulfur batteries with activated carbons derived from olive stones. Carbon, 70, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.01.002
Nelson, J., Misra, S., Yang, Y., Jackson, A., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Dai, H., Andrews, J. C., Cui, Y., & Toney, M. F. (2012). In operando X-ray diffraction and transmission X-ray microscopy of lithium sulfur batteries. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134(14), 6337–6343. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2121926
Odoom-Wubah, T., Rubio, S., Tirado, J. L., Ortiz, G. F., Akoi, B. J., Huang, J., & Li, Q. (2020). Waste Pd/Fish-Collagen as anode for energy storage. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 131, 109968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109968
Qin, D., Bi, S., You, X., Wang, M., & Chen, X.-G. (2022). Development and application of fish scale wastes as versatile natural biomaterials. Chemical Engineering Journal, 428, 131102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131102
Ryu, H., Yoon, H. J., & Kim, S.-W. (2019). Hybrid energy harvesters: Toward sustainable energy harvesting. Advanced Materials, 31(1), 1804950. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802898
Selvamani, V., Ravikumar, R., Suryanarayanan, V., Velayutham, D., & Gopukumar, S. (2015). Fish scale derived nitrogen doped hierarchical porous carbon-A high rate performing anode for lithium ion cell. Electrochimica Acta, 182, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.096
Senthil, C., & Lee, C. W. (2021). Biomass-derived biochar materials as sustainable energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110464
Sevilla, M., Al-Jumialy, A. S. M., Fuertes, A. B., & Mokaya, R. (2018). Optimization of the pore structure of biomass-based carbons. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 10(2), 1623–1633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b10433
Simon, P., Gogotsi, Y., & Dunn, B. (2014). Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin? Science, 343(6176), 1210–1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249625
Sotelo, C. G., Blanco, M., Ramos, P., & Vázquez, J. A. (2021). Sustainable sources from aquatic organisms for cosmeceutical ingredients. Cosmetics, 8(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8020048
Tang, X., Liu, D., Wang, Y.-J., Cui, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Research advances in biomass-derived nanostructured carbons. Progress in Materials Science, 118, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100770
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012). Electrical energy storage for transportation. Energy & Environmental Science, 5(7), 7854–7863. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21892e
Titirici, M.-M., & Antonietti, M. (2010). Chemistry and materials options of sustainable carbon materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 39(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1039/B819318P
Wang, J., Chew, S. Y., & Ashraf, S. (2008). Sulfur-mesoporous carbon composites for lithium rechargeable batteries. Carbon, 46(2), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.007
Wang, L., Zheng, Y., Wang, X., Chen, S., Xu, F., Zuo, L., Wu, J., Sun, L., Li, Z., & Hou, H. (2014). Nitrogen-doped porous carbon/Co3O4 nanocomposites as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 6, 7117–7125. https://doi.org/10.1021/am406053s
Wang, Z., Shen, D., Wu, C., & Gu, S. (2018). State-of-the-art on the production of carbon nanomaterials from biomass. Green Chemistry, 20(22), 5031–5057. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8GC01748D
Winter, M., Barnett, B., & Xu, K. (2018). Before Li-ion batteries. Chemical Reviews, 118(23), 11433–11456. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422
Wu, H.-L., Mou, J.-R., & Lin, D.-M. (2016). Hierarchically porous carbon derived from mushroom as cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 212, 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.153
Yaman, S. (2004). Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(5), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00177-8
Yao, H., Zheng, G., Li, W., McDowell, M. T., Seh, Z., Liu, N., Lu, Z., & Cui, Y. (2013). Crab shells as sustainable templates from nature for nanostructured battery electrodes. Nano Letters, 13, 3385–3390. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401729r
Yuan, X., Dissanayake, P. D., Gao, B., Liu, W.-J., Lee, K.-B., & Ok, Y. S. (2021). Review on upgrading organic waste to value-added carbon materials. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113128
Zhang, J., Xiang, J., Dong, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Xu, C., & Du, G. (2014). Biomass derived activated carbon with 3D connected architecture for rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 116, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.035
Zhang, S. S. (2013). Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: Fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions. Journal of Power Sources, 231, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.102
Zhang, Y. G., Zhao, Y., Konarov, A., Li, Z., & Chen, P. (2015). Effect of mesoporous carbon microtube prepared by carbonizing the poplar catkin on sulfur cathode performance in Li/S batteries. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 619, 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.055
Recommended articles
Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis of Biomass and Waste Streams: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Perspective on Feedstocks, Mechanisms, and Circular Bioeconomy Applications
Solid-State Batteries at the Interface Frontier: Materials, Architectures, and Sustainable Pathways toward Safe High-Energy Storage — A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Perspective
Spatiotemporal Assessment of Socio-Technical Factors in Deploying AI-Based Renewable Energy Solutions in Agricultural Communities
Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
20
Views
0
Save
Save
0
Citation
Citation
20
View
View
0
Share
Share