Journal of Primeasia

Integrative Disciplinary Research | Online ISSN 3064-9870 | Print ISSN 3069-4353
570
Citations
203k
Views
127
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
RESEARCH ARTICLE   (Open Access)

Predicting Supply Chain Resilience with Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Ensemble and Neural Approaches Across Logistics, Manufacturing, Healthcare, and Agriculture

Abstract References

Md Jahidul Islam Ridoy 1*

+ Author Affiliations

Journal of Primeasia 3 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.3110776

Submitted: 02 May 2022 Revised: 13 July 2022  Accepted: 19 July 2022  Published: 22 July 2022 


Abstract

Background: Modern supply chains operate under a level of complexity and volatility that conventional analytical tools were never designed to handle. Geopolitical disruptions, pandemic-driven demand shocks, and climate-related logistics failures have collectively exposed the fragility of systems still relying on static forecasting rules and historical averages. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a compelling — though not uncomplicated — response to this challenge, offering the ability to model nonlinear relationships across high-dimensional operational data in ways that traditional methods cannot.

Methods: This study employed a quantitative cross-sectional design combining survey data from 200 supply chain professionals across logistics, manufacturing, healthcare, and agriculture with a supervised ML modelling framework. Respondents completed a validated five-point Likert-scale instrument measuring five constructs: Demand Forecasting (DF), Inventory Optimization (IO), Risk Prediction (RP), Operational Efficiency (OE), and Supply Chain Resilience (SCR). Five algorithms — Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Artificial Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, and Multiple Linear Regression — were trained on an 80/20 stratified train-test split and evaluated using accuracy, R², RMSE, and error rate. Feature importance was extracted using both mean decrease in impurity and permutation-based methods.

Results: Random Forest achieved the strongest predictive performance (accuracy = 87%, R² = 0.70), with Gradient Boosting close behind (86%, R² = 0.69). All constructs were strongly and positively intercorrelated, with Demand Forecasting showing the tightest association with SCR (r = 0.74), followed by Risk Prediction (r = 0.72). Feature importance analysis identified DF (0.30) and RP (0.28) as the dominant predictors of resilience. Over 70% of respondents perceived high ML impact on forecasting and risk management, while only 8% reported low impact across all dimensions.

Conclusion: ML-powered anticipatory capabilities — particularly demand forecasting and risk prediction — are the most robust drivers of supply chain resilience, outweighing execution-layer efficiency in predictive importance. Meaningful adoption barriers persist, however, and the benefits of ML remain unevenly distributed across firm sizes and geographies.

Keywords: Supply Chain Resilience; Machine Learning; Demand Forecasting; Predictive Analytics; Ensemble Methods

References

Ali, I., Nagalingam, S., & Gurd, B. (2017). Building resilience in SMEs of perishable product supply chains: enablers, barriers and risks. Production Planning & Control, 28(15), 1236–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1362487

Allaoui, H., Guo, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.367

Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Xu, L., Dhamija, P., & Kayikci, Y. (2019). Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104559

Barreto, L., Amaral, A., & Pereira, T. (2017). Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.045

Boyson, S. (2014). Cyber supply chain risk management: Revolutionizing the strategic control of critical IT systems. Technovation, 34(7), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.02.001

Cadavid, J. P. U., Lamouri, S., Grabot, B., Pellerin, R., & Fortin, A. (2020). Machine learning applied in production planning and control: a state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(6), 1531–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01531-7

Cai, M., & Luo, J. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 on Manufacturing Industry and Corresponding Countermeasures from Supply Chain Perspective. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 25(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-020-2206-z

Chang, Y., Iakovou, E., & Shi, W. (2019). Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2082–2099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1651946

Chhetri, S. R., Faezi, S., Rashid, N., & Faruque, M. a. A. (2017). Manufacturing supply chain and product lifecycle security in the era of industry 4.0. Journal of Hardware and Systems Security, 2(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41635-017-0031-0

Chien, C., Lin, Y., & Lin, S. (2020). Deep reinforcement learning for selecting demand forecast models to empower Industry 3.5 and an empirical study for a semiconductor component distributor. International Journal of Production Research, 58(9), 2784–2804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1733125

Golan, M. S., Jernegan, L. H., & Linkov, I. (2020). Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Environment Systems & Decisions, 40(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09777-w

Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0409-7

Govindan, R., & Al-Ansari, T. (2019). Computational decision framework for enhancing resilience of the energy, water and food nexus in risky environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.015

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). New disruption risk management perspectives in supply chains: digital twins, the ripple effect, and resileanness. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.138

Ivanov, D., Sokolov, B., & Dolgui, A. (2013). The Ripple effect in supply chains: trade-off ‘efficiency-flexibility-resilience’ in disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 52(7), 2154–2172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.858836

Klemeš, J. J., Van Fan, Y., & Jiang, P. (2020). The energy and environmental footprints of COVID-19 fighting measures – PPE, disinfection, supply chains. Energy, 211, 118701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118701

Koh, L., Dolgui, A., & Sarkis, J. (2020). Blockchain in transport and logistics – paradigms and transitions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2054–2062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1736428

Koumoulos, E., Trompeta, A., Santos, R., Martins, M., Santos, C., Iglesias, V., Böhm, R., Gong, G., Chiminelli, A., Verpoest, I., Kiekens, P., & Charitidis, C. (2019). Research and Development in Carbon Fibers and Advanced High-Performance Composites Supply Chain in Europe: A Roadmap for challenges and the industrial uptake. Journal of Composites Science, 3(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3030086

Li, Y., Carabelli, S., Fadda, E., Manerba, D., Tadei, R., & Terzo, O. (2020). Machine learning and optimization for production rescheduling in Industry 4.0. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 110(9–10), 2445–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05850-5

Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

Makris, D., Hansen, Z. N. L., & Khan, O. (2019). Adapting to supply chain 4.0: an explorative study of multinational companies. Supply Chain Forum an International Journal, 20(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1577114

Murtagh, N., Scott, L., & Fan, J. (2020). Sustainable and resilient construction: Current status and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122264

Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2018). The role and impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the business strategy of the Value Chain—The case of Hungary. Sustainability, 10(10), 3491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103491

Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Page, K., Nurse, J. R. C., Montalvo, R. M., Santos, O., Maddox, L., & Burnap, P. (2020). Cyber risk at the edge: current and future trends on cyber risk analytics and artificial intelligence in the industrial internet of things and industry 4.0 supply chains. Cybersecurity, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-020-00052-8

Ralston, P., & Blackhurst, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: a driver of capability enhancement or capability loss? International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 5006–5019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1736724

Ramirez-Peña, M., Sotano, A. J. S., Pérez-Fernandez, V., Abad, F. J., & Batista, M. (2019). Achieving a sustainable shipbuilding supply chain under I4.0 perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118789

Shahbazi, Z., & Byun, Y. (2020). A procedure for tracing supply chains for perishable food based on blockchain, machine learning and fuzzy logic. Electronics, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10010041

Shang, C., & You, F. (2019). Data Analytics and Machine learning for smart process Manufacturing: Recent advances and perspectives in the Big Data Era. Engineering, 5(6), 1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.019

Sharma, A., Adhikary, A., & Borah, S. B. (2020). Covid-19′s impact on supply chain decisions: Strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data. Journal of Business Research, 117, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.035

Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M. (2019). Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1215–1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2428

Sobb, T., Turnbull, B., & Moustafa, N. (2020). Supply Chain 4.0: A survey of cyber security challenges, solutions and future directions. Electronics, 9(11), 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9111864

Wang, T., Zhang, Q., Chong, H., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrated Supplier Selection Framework in a Resilient Construction Supply Chain: An approach via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA). Sustainability, 9(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020289


Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
45
Views

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



0
Save
0
Citation
45
View
0
Share