Journal of Ai ML DL

1. Introduction

AI technology revolutionizes healthcare systems across the globe through its development of new solutions for medical diagnosis and treatment and patient monitoring and operational efficiency. AI-based tools including machine learning algorithms and predictive analytics and natural language processing systems help healthcare providers improve clinical decisions and decrease medical mistakes and hospital operational costs (Sweeney et al., 2023). AI technology brings two main benefits to healthcare institutions which include a 25% improvement in diagnosis accuracy and an 18% reduction in treatment waiting times. AI implementation in healthcare systems faces multiple challenges which need proper project management to address effectively (Kondylakis et al., 2023). The successful implementation of AI requires organizations to establish proper governance systems and modern technology systems and staff training programs and secure data protection and ethical standards. Study indicates that 22% of healthcare AI projects experience failure because organizations lack proper planning and technical expertise and organizational backing (Retico et al., 2021). A structured project management system needs to develop which unites technical solutions with human-based approaches for successful implementation. The operational and clinical advantages of AI enable strategic decision-making and resource optimization. Predictive analytics enables healthcare providers to monitor patients better which leads to a 15% decrease in hospital readmissions (Nashid et al., 2024). AI-based workflow management systems help organizations improve their administrative operations through enhanced efficiency. Healthcare organizations implement AI systems under new regulatory frameworks which protect patient information and uphold ethical standards to build trust with patients (Nagulpelli et al., 2022).

The study about AI in healthcare shows that complete management systems need to combine governance frameworks with technical systems and staff development and ongoing oversight. The operation of AI depends on two essential elements which are governance systems and technological readiness for reliable functioning (Agarwal et al., 2019). Human factors including staff training and capacity development represent essential elements which determine system adoption rates and operational stability as well as sustainability. Research shows organizations that dedicate about 20% of their project budget to workforce development achieve better AI adoption success and improved implementation results (Biswas et al., 2024). AI provides healthcare organizations with multiple benefits although there exists insufficient study about integrated project management models in this field. Most of the research in this field concentrates on technological enhancements or particular elements of AI implementation which creates gaps in our understanding of how governance systems and infrastructure and workforce and monitoring systems interact (Kong, 2021). This area requires immediate attention to build complete systems which boost operational efficiency and achieve better medical results while upholding professional ethics. The study intends to investigate AI-based healthcare project management by studying its components and benefits and strategic indicators and how governance relates to technical infrastructure and workforce training and monitoring and ethical compliance (Ta et al., 2022). The study analyzes healthcare professional and administrative staff perspectives to determine essential elements for successful AI implementation which results in a project management framework based on evidence. The study results help healthcare organizations apply AI technology effectively for achieving better patient care and operational efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Design and Population

The study examined AI-based healthcare project management elements and their advantages and strategic performance indicators through a cross-sectional survey study design. The target population included healthcare professionals and administrators and IT personnel who work at healthcare facilities (Greenspan et al., 2020). The study included 305 participants who were chosen through purposive and convenience sampling methods to represent various age groups and educational backgrounds and professional experience levels. The data collection process took place during three months through a structured questionnaire which researchers developed by studying previous research and receiving guidance from field experts (Tutun et al., 2022). The questionnaire collected demographic information and asked respondents about their views on artificial intelligence benefits and their understanding of project management core elements and strategic performance indicators. The institutional review board at the relevant institution granted ethical approval while all participants provided their informed consent (Jahan et al., 2024). The study allowed participants to join voluntarily while keeping their personal information completely confidential. The research design enabled the collection of complete data about how people understand and feel about AI integration in healthcare systems which produced valid and reliable results.

2.2 Data Collection and Instrumentation

The study utilized a structured questionnaire which included four main sections about demographic information and AI healthcare project management components and AI implementation advantages and project success indicators. The section collected information about age, gender, education level, marital status and place of residence. The evaluation process used Likert-scale measurements to analyze components and benefits while statistical indicators including P-value and Chi-square and Beta (ß) coefficients were calculated to test the hypotheses (Davenport & Glaser, 2022). The questionnaire underwent pre-testing with a limited group of participants to assess its comprehension and reliability which resulted in small changes based on their input. The data collection process used two methods which included online and in-person approaches to reach the highest number of participants and make it easy for anyone to participate (Akhir, et al., 2024). We used SPSS version 26 to analyze the coded data which they entered into the system. The researchers used Pearson correlation analysis together with descriptive statistics and regression analysis to study how the variables connect to each other. The study objectives were met through a methodology which delivered both systematic and reliable data collection that could be duplicated by other researchers (Bibhu et al., 2023).

2.3 Data Analysis

We applied SPSS and Microsoft Excel tools for their data analysis which included descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The descriptive analysis presented data through frequencies and percentages and mean scores which described demographic details and AI project elements and user benefits. The study used regression analysis to determine which project success indicators proved statistically significant through P-values and Chi-square (X²) tests and Beta (ß) coefficients assessment (Dicuonzo et al., 2022). The study used Pearson correlation analysis to identify the relationships between strategic indicators which include governance and data management and technical infrastructure and workforce training and monitoring. The data visualization through tables and charts helped readers understand the results more clearly (Dow et al., 2022). The statistical analysis followed all standard assumptions which include normality and independence and linearity. The evaluation process used a P-value threshold of 0.05 to determine statistical significance (Widner et al., 2023). The study method identified essential factors which affect healthcare AI adoption and showed how strategic elements connect to each other while proving governance and technology and human elements carry different weights in project management success (Nashid, et al., 2024).

3.Results

3.1 Demographic Characteristics of Respondents

The study comprised 305 defendants who contributed in the research. The gender distribution demonstrations that 58.4% of members were male though 41.6% were female which generates a small male mainstream according to Table 1. The survey results establish that greatest participants fitted to the young adult group because 36.7% were amid 18 and 25 years old and 32.1% were between 26- and 35-years childhood yet 18.4% were in the 36 to 45 age support and 12.8% remained in the 46 and elder group. Most members attained a bachelor’s degree at 39.7% while 28.5% finished advanced secondary teaching and 17.4% obtained master’s degrees or advanced and 14.4% ended secondary school. The study displays that 53.4% of members were single while 39.7% were married and 6.9% identified as other. The population distribution specifies that 64.3% of people live in city areas while 35.7% reside in countryside areas. The research members consist of young cultured urban inhabitants who perhaps shape the study results finished their exact viewpoints and reactions.

3.2 Components of AI Healthcare Project Management Model

The Figure 1 shows the distribution of important elements from the AI Healthcare Project Management Model according to the survey responses. The study shows that governance and policy make up 25% of the total focus which proves organizations need proper structures and decision systems to implement AI in healthcare. Data management and security, and technical infrastructure were both identified as equally significant, each contributing 20%, reflecting the need for robust data governance and reliable technological systems to support AI integration. The workforce training program achieved a 15% success rate which shows that human development stands as a crucial element for successful AI technology deployment and operation. The evaluation process and privacy compliance and ethical standards each received 10% which demonstrates organizations need to keep track of their work and follow ethical rules. The table shows that governance together with technical readiness create the foundation of the model but organizations must also focus on human resources and monitoring and ethics to achieve successful AI healthcare deployment (Gerke et al., 2020).

3.3 Perceived Benefits of AI-Based Healthcare Infrastructure

The perceived benefits of implementing AI-based healthcare infrastructure as reported by the respondents. The most frequently recognized benefit was faster and accurate diagnosis, accounting for 25% of the responses, emphasizing the potential of AI to enhance clinical decision-making and reduce diagnostic delays. The respondents demonstrated their understanding of AI systems which reduce mistakes in medical treatments through a 22% response rate that indicated they recognized this advantage in Figure 2. The 20% improvement in patient monitoring showed continuous health surveillance and early detection of complications as essential factors in healthcare. The data shows that 15% of respondents believe AI technology helps hospitals achieve better operational efficiency through its ability to optimize administrative work and operational procedures. The survey results show 10% of people identify cost savings as a benefit which demonstrates their understanding of how automation and resource optimization lead to financial advantages. The eight percent of respondents who believe AI improves decision-making demonstrate its importance for organizations to achieve superior strategic and clinical choices (Leone et al., 2020). The results demonstrate that healthcare professionals view AI as a tool which delivers operational efficiency and exact results while maintaining safe medical environments.

3.4 Significant Indicators for AI Healthcare Project Management

Table 4 presents the statistically significant indicators influencing the AI Healthcare Project Management Model. The results show that governance and policy share a direct connection to successful project implementation with statistical significance at P=0.012 and X²=10.45 and ß=0.28. The results show that data management and security hold statistical significance (P = 0.034, X² = 8.92, ß = 0.22) which demonstrates the need to protect health data and keep information systems secure in Table 2. The results indicate that technical infrastructure stands out as the most significant indicator (P = 0.001, X² = 15.33, ß = 0.31) because reliable technology proves essential for AI system integration. The statistical evidence shows that workforce training (P = 0.045, X² = 7.84, ß = 0.19) requires investment to build human skills for AI tool operation. The system maintains performance through monitoring and evaluation which received a P=0.022 and X²=9.12 and ß=0.24 rating and patient trust and legal compliance depend on the system's adherence to ethical standards and privacy regulations which received a P=0.008 and X²=12.56 and ß=0.29 rating. The research findings show that successful AI implementation requires proper governance alongside suitable technology and skilled human resources and ethical frameworks.

3.5 Pearson Correlation Between Strategic Indicators

The Pearson correlation coefficients among the strategic indicators of the AI Healthcare Project Management Model. The results show positive correlations between all variables at moderate to strong levels which means that progress in one area leads to better results in other areas. The data shows that governance and policy maintain strong connections with data management systems (r = 0.62) and technical infrastructure (r = 0.55) because organizations need solid frameworks to establish effective data systems and technological capabilities in Table 3. The research shows that data management maintains strong connections with technical infrastructure (r = 0.58) and monitoring and evaluation systems (r = 0.52) which proves that good data management practices support both technology deployment and performance assessment. The relationship between workforce training and governance and policy stands at r = 0.48 and monitoring and evaluation at r = 0.41 which demonstrates that staff development depends on management practices. The table shows that all strategic indicators function as a unified system which requires an all-encompassing method for AI healthcare project management that includes governance and technology and monitoring and workforce development to achieve implementation success (Papia, et al., 2024).

4. Discussion

The current study investigates fundamental elements and advantages and essential performance metrics of AI-based healthcare project management systems. The research also investigates how different organizational performance indicators interrelate to provide implementation guidelines for AI systems in healthcare infrastructure (Dlugatch et al., 2023). The survey data from Table 1 shows that most participants came from young educated urban areas while 58.4% identified as male and 41.6% as female. The majority of participants (68.8%) fell within the 18-to-35-year age group while 39.7% of them held bachelor degrees which shows that our sample consisted of well-educated individuals. The demographic makeup of the population likely supports better understanding and favorable views of AI adoption because younger educated people tend to accept new technology more readily (Goirand et al., 2021). The majority of healthcare facilities operate in urban areas at 64.3% which shows that these locations have better digital infrastructure that supports AI healthcare system adoption. The AI Healthcare Project Management Model analysis from Figure 1 demonstrates that governance and policy stands as the leading factor with 25% importance and data management and security and technical infrastructure each hold 20% importance. These findings underscore the centrality of organizational frameworks and technological readiness in the successful deployment of AI. The governance system operates through defined decision-making systems and accountability systems which work together with strict data management systems and technological infrastructure to protect AI system accuracy and security and operational stability (Widner et al., 2023). The operational effectiveness depends on workforce training which accounts for 15% and monitoring and evaluation that represents 10% because these elements support human capacity development and performance assessment. The AI deployment requires ethical and privacy compliance at a 10% level to preserve trust and maintain legal requirements.

The respondents identified efficiency and accuracy and patient safety as the main benefits of AI-based healthcare infrastructure according to Figure 2. AI technology delivers two main benefits which include 25% faster diagnosis speed and 22% improved diagnostic precision that together improve medical decision-making and reduce human mistakes. The implementation of AI technology has resulted in two key benefits which include 20% better patient monitoring and 15% enhanced hospital operational efficiency. The respondents viewed cost savings at 10% and better decision-making at 8% as less important benefits of the system. The research findings show that healthcare organizations achieve operational efficiency through AI systems which also lead to better patient results and decreased mistakes in medical care delivery (Mujawar et al., 2020). The statistical evaluation of key indicators Table 2 shows that technical infrastructure leads with a 0.31 beta value and 0.001 significance level followed by ethical and privacy compliance at 0.29 beta and 0.008 significance and governance and policy at 0.28 beta and 0.012 significance. The results show that Data management and security (ß = 0.22, P = 0.034), Monitoring and evaluation (ß = 0.24, P = 0.022), and Workforce training (ß = 0.19, P = 0.045) significantly influence AI project outcomes through their combined effects on organizational elements and technological factors and ethical standards and human components. The study results match previous research which shows healthcare AI implementation needs proper infrastructure and governance systems and trained staff (Wang et al., 2022).

The Pearson correlation analysis results from Table 3 show that all strategic indicators maintain positive correlations which vary between moderate and strong strength. The study shows governance and policy systems maintain strong links to data management (r = 0.62) and technical infrastructure (r = 0.55) which means organizations with proper frameworks can achieve technological readiness. The results show that data management maintains positive relationships with technical infrastructure (r = 0.58) and monitoring and evaluation systems (r = 0.52) which proves that reliable information systems serve as the basis for operational assessment and continuous improvement. Workforce training showed moderate correlations with governance (r = 0.48) and monitoring (r = 0.41), highlighting the interdependence between human capacity development and management oversight. The results show that AI healthcare project management needs a complete strategy which combines governance with technical infrastructure and data management and workforce training and monitoring and ethical compliance (Cartolovni et al., 2022). Healthcare organizations need both solid technology systems and governance frameworks to achieve success but they also require trained staff members and ongoing performance monitoring to attain better patient results and operational efficiency and maintain ethical standards. AI technology needs this combined method to reach its full ability for healthcare delivery transformation (Fisher & Rosella, 2022).

5. Conclusion

The study study identifies the essential parts and advantages and main performance indicators for managing AI healthcare projects. The implementation of AI depends on three fundamental elements which include governance and technical infrastructure and data management systems. The successful deployment of AI systems requires organizations to establish three essential elements: governance and technical infrastructure and data management systems. The study proved these indicators to be significant through statistical analysis and Pearson correlation showed strong connections between strategic factors. The study results show that a complete strategy which combines technology with governance and human capacity.

Author Contributions

K.M.H. conceived and designed the study, developed the project management framework, supervised data collection, and contributed to manuscript writing and critical revision. M.S.M. performed data collection, conducted statistical analysis, interpreted the findings, and contributed to drafting and editing the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

Agarwal, Y., Jain, M., Sinha, S., & Dhir, S. (2019). Delivering high-tech, AI-based health care at Apollo Hospitals. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21981

Akhir, A., Rahman, F., Islam, A., Chowdhury, N., Mia, M. S., Hossain, M. I. (2024). "Strategic Role of Business Analytics in Healthcare Systems Performance Optimization", Journal of Primeasia, 5(1),1-8,10347. https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.5110347

Bibhu, V., Das, L., Rana, A., Sharma, S., & Salagrama, S. (2023). AI model for blockchain based industrial application in healthcare IoT. In Engineering cyber-physical systems and critical infrastructures (pp. 163–184). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31952-5_8

Biswas, A., Hossain, M. I., Jahan, I., Chowdhury, N., Mia, M. S. (2024). "Advanced Analytics in IT Systems Unlocking Insights Enhancing Decision Making and Maximizing Business Value", Applied IT & Engineering, 2(1),1-8,10379. https://doi.org/10.25163/engineering.2110379

Bizzo, B. C., Dasegowda, G., Bridge, C., Miller, B., Hillis, J. M., Kalra, M. K., Durniak, K., Stout, M., Schultz, T., Alkasab, T., & Dreyer, K. J. (2023). Addressing the challenges of implementing artificial intelligence tools in clinical practice: Principles from experience. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 20(3), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.01.002

Cartolovni, A., Tomicic, A., & Mosler, E. L. (2022). Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 161, 104738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104738

Davenport, T. H., & Glaser, J. P. (2022). Factors governing the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare providers. Discover Health Systems, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-022-00004-8

Dicuonzo, G., Donofrio, F., Fusco, A., & Shini, M. (2022). Healthcare system: Moving forward with artificial intelligence. Technovation, 120, 102510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102510

Dlugatch, R., Georgieva, A., & Kerasidou, A. (2023). Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care. BMC Medical Ethics, 24(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00917-w

Dow, E. R., Keenan, T. D., Lad, E. M., Lee, A. Y., Lee, C. S., Loewenstein, A., Eydelman, M. B., Chew, E. Y., Keane, P. A., & Lim, J. I. (2022). From data to deployment. Ophthalmology, 129(5), e43–e59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.01.002

Fisher, S., & Rosella, L. C. (2022). Priorities for successful use of artificial intelligence by public health organizations: a literature review. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14422-z

Gerke, S., Minssen, T., & Cohen, G. (2020). Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 295–336). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818438-7.00012-5

Goirand, M., Austin, E., & Clay-Williams, R. (2021). Implementing Ethics in Healthcare AI-Based Applications: A scoping review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(5), 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00336-3

Greenspan, H., Estépar, R. S. J., Niessen, W. J., Siegel, E., & Nielsen, M. (2020). Position paper on COVID-19 imaging and AI: From the clinical needs and technological challenges to initial AI solutions at the lab and national level towards a new era for AI in healthcare. Medical Image Analysis, 66, 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101800

Jahan, I., Chowdhury, N., Mia, M. S., Hossain, M. I., Biswas, A. (2024). "Transforming Business Operations Through IT-Enabled Predictive and Prescriptive Analytics: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices", Applied IT & Engineering, 2(1),1-7,10381. https://doi.org/10.25163/engineering.2110381

Kondylakis, H., Kalokyri, V., Sfakianakis, S., Marias, K., Tsiknakis, M., Jimenez-Pastor, A., Camacho-Ramos, E., Blanquer, I., Segrelles, J. D., López-Huguet, S., Barelle, C., Kogut-Czarkowska, M., Tsakou, G., Siopis, N., Sakellariou, Z., Bizopoulos, P., Drossou, V., Lalas, A., Votis, K., . . . Lekadir, K. (2023). Data infrastructures for AI in medical imaging: a report on the experiences of five EU projects. European Radiology Experimental, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-023-00336-x

Kong, L. (2021). A study on the AI-based online triage model for hospitals in sustainable smart city. Future Generation Computer Systems, 125, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.06.023

Leone, D., Schiavone, F., Appio, F. P., & Chiao, B. (2020). How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem. Journal of Business Research, 129, 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.008

Mujawar, M., Gohel, H., Bhardwaj, S., Srinivasan, S., Hickman, N., & Kaushik, A. (2020). Nano-enabled biosensing systems for intelligent healthcare: towards COVID-19 management. Materials Today Chemistry, 17, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100306

Nagulpelli, S., Chavan, A., Kandalkar, A., & Kulkarni, S. (2022). AI-Based Health Management System. In Lecture notes in electrical engineering (pp. 379–389). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6581-4_29

Nashid, &., Papia, S. K., Islam, A., Akhir, A., Rahman, F., Biswas, A. (2024). "The Role of Deep Learning and AI in Revolutionizing Business Analytics: Frameworks, Applications, and Managerial Implications", Applied IT & Engineering, 2(1),1-8,10365. https://doi.org/10.25163/engineering.2110365

Nashid, &., Papia, S. K., Islam, A., Akhir, A., Rahman, F., Biswas, A. (2024). "The Role of Deep Learning and AI in Revolutionizing Business Analytics: Frameworks, Applications, and Managerial Implications", Applied IT & Engineering, 2(1),1-8,10365. https://doi.org/10.25163/engineering.2110365

Papia, S. K., Rahman, F., Nashid, S., Akhir, A., Biswas, A., Islam, A. (2024). "The Role of AI and IT in Transforming Stock Price Analysis and Decision-Making Frameworks", Journal of Primeasia, 5(1),1-7,10376. https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.5110376

Retico, A., Avanzo, M., Boccali, T., Bonacorsi, D., Botta, F., Cuttone, G., Martelli, B., Salomoni, D., Spiga, D., Trianni, A., Stasi, M., Iori, M., & Talamonti, C. (2021). Enhancing the impact of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A joint AIFM-INFN Italian initiative for a dedicated cloud-based computing infrastructure. Physica Medica, 91, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.10.005

Shah, S. I. H., Naeem, M., Paragliola, G., Coronato, A., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2023). An AI-empowered infrastructure for risk prevention during medical examination. Expert Systems With Applications, 225, 120048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120048

Solanki, P., Grundy, J., & Hussain, W. (2022). Operationalising ethics in artificial intelligence for healthcare: a framework for AI developers. AI And Ethics, 3(1), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00195-z

Sweeney, D., Nair, S., & Cormican, K. (2023). Scaling AI-based industry 4.0 projects in the medical device industry: An exploratory analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.349

Ta, A. W. A., Goh, H. L., Ang, C., Koh, L. Y., Poon, K., & Miller, S. M. (2022). Two Singapore public healthcare AI applications for national screening programs and other examples. Health Care Science, 1(2), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.10

Tutun, S., Johnson, M. E., Ahmed, A., Albizri, A., Irgil, S., Yesilkaya, I., Ucar, E. N., Sengun, T., & Harfouche, A. (2022). An AI-based decision support system for predicting mental health disorders. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10282-5

Wang, G., Badal, A., Jia, X., Maltz, J. S., Mueller, K., Myers, K. J., Niu, C., Vannier, M., Yan, P., Yu, Z., & Zeng, R. (2022). Development of metaverse for intelligent healthcare. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(11), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00549-6

Widner, K., Virmani, S., Krause, J., Nayar, J., Tiwari, R., Pedersen, E. R., Jeji, D., Hammel, N., Matias, Y., Corrado, G. S., Liu, Y., Peng, L., & Webster, D. R. (2023). Lessons learned from translating AI from development to deployment in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 29(6), 1304–1306. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02293-9