Journal of Primeasia
Integrative Disciplinary Research | Online ISSN 3064-9870 | Print ISSN 3069-4353
570
Citations
227.1k
Views
151
Articles
REVIEWS (Open Access)
Green Technology Innovation in Corporate Sustainability: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalytic Perspective
Md Nazmuddin Moin Khan1*, Md. Rezaul Haque2
Journal of Primeasia 7 (1) 1-8 https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.7110831
Submitted: 15 June 2026 Revised: 01 August 2026 Accepted: 11 August 2026 Published: 13 August 2026
Abstract
Green Technology Innovation (GTI) has emerged as a critical strategic mechanism for firms pursuing sustainability in an era of escalating environmental challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize empirical evidence on the drivers, barriers, and outcomes of GTI, highlighting how environmental regulation, corporate social responsibility, leadership, organizational culture, and digital transformation shape innovation performance. The analysis reveals that well-designed environmental policies, such as green credit guidelines and low-carbon initiatives, significantly stimulate GTI by reducing uncertainty and improving access to resources. Internal organizational factors, particularly top management attention and a green-oriented culture, further enhance firms’ capacity to develop and implement sustainable innovations. CSR engagement strengthens stakeholder trust and reinforces internal motivation for environmental investments, while digital technologies such as big data analytics and AI facilitate real-time monitoring, predictive optimization, and improved Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance. However, barriers including financing constraints, agency costs, and customer concentration can impede GTI adoption, particularly in small and medium enterprises. Meta-analytic results also demonstrate heterogeneity across firm size, ownership, and regional context, emphasizing the need for context-sensitive strategies. By integrating policy, organizational, and technological perspectives, this study offers a comprehensive understanding of GTI dynamics, informing both scholarly discourse and managerial practice. The findings underscore the importance of aligning regulatory frameworks, corporate governance, and technological capabilities to achieve sustainable business transformation and competitive advantage.Keywords: Green Technology Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, Environmental Regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Digital Transformation, ESG Performance, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis
References
Aboalhool, T., Alzubi, A., & Iyiola, K. (2024). Humane entrepreneurship in the circular economy. Sustainability, 16(6), 2517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062517
Alshdaifat, S. M., Aziz, N. H. A., Alhasnawi, M. Y., Alharasis, E. E., Al Qadi, F., & Al Amosh, H. (2024). The role of digital technologies in corporate sustainability. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(11), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17110509
Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing corporate sustainability and CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1314
Bibri, S. E. (2018). The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.032
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). Sustainable business model archetypes: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Bebbington, J., Gray, R., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Financial accounting and environmental reporting. Ecological Economics, 39(1), 55–68.
Cai, C., Tu, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104692
Chen, Y., & Jin, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and green technology innovation. Sustainability, 15(10), 8164. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108164
Cui, Z., Wang, Q., Wang, X., & Yang, J. (2024). Green technology innovations and corporate customer concentration. Sustainability, 16(20), 9109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209109
Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204
Dhaliwal, D., Judd, J. S., Serfling, M., & Shaikh, S. (2016). Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.005
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate culture of sustainability and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 114, 252–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.07.002
Fan, D., & Liu, T. T. (2022). Low-carbon cities and energy efficiency. Review of Industrial Economics, 2, 93–111.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on financial constraints. Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909–1940. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009
Hong, M., Li, Z., & Drakeford, B. (2021). Green credit guidelines and corporate green technology innovation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041682
Huang, J., Sun, Y., & Zhang, S. (2025). Green technology innovation and corporate ESG. Sustainability, 17(4), 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041410
Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2023). Climate risk disclosure and institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 36(7), 2617–2650. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad011
Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196
Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Cash flow sensitivities and financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555163
Kitsios, F., Kamariotou, M., & Talias, M. A. (2020). Corporate sustainability strategies and decision support methods. Sustainability, 12(2), 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020521
Le, T. T. (2022). Humane entrepreneurship and circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133178
Mbanyele, W., Huang, H., Li, Y., Muchenje, L. T., & Wang, F. (2022). CSR disclosure laws and green innovation. Economics Letters, 212, 110322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110322
Ocasio, W. (2011). Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22, 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0602
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary Environmental Accounting. Routledge.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Wang, J., Liu, Z., Shi, L., & Tan, J. (2022). Low-carbon policy and corporate GTI. Sustainability, 14(17), 10953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710953
Wang, X. (2020). Corporate sustainability and stakeholder interests. Journal of Business Research, 110, 18–29.
Xu, X., Imran, M., Ayaz, M., & Lohana, S. (2022). Mediating role of GTI with CSR and performance. Sustainability, 14(24), 16951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416951
Yang, C. J., Chen, Y. S., & Zhan, J. X. (2017). Organizational culture and green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 631–654.
Ying, Z., & Jin, L. (2024). Market regulations and green technology innovation. Sustainability, 16(3), 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031120
Yuan, H., Luan, H., & Wang, X. (2024). ESG rating events and corporate GTI. Sustainability, 16(19), 8308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198308
Zhong, W., & Jin, L. (2025). Climate risk disclosure and corporate GTI. Sustainability, 17(6), 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062699
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2023). Green technology adoption and competitive advantage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 352, 131566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131566
Recommended articles
Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis of Biomass and Waste Streams: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Perspective on Feedstocks, Mechanisms, and Circular Bioeconomy Applications
Governing Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Corporate Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytical Synthesis of Internal and External Governance Mechanisms
Valorization of Fish Industry Waste and Biomass-Derived Materials for Sustainable Electrochemical Energy Storage: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis
Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
42
Views
0
Save
Save
0
Citation
Citation
42
View
View
0
Share
Share