Safety and Efficacy of Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
Mohamed Zewita 1*, Mahmoud M. Shalaby 2, Atef M. Abdlatif 2, M. Atef Abdalziz 2
Journal of Angiotherapy 8(8) 1-7 https://doi.org/10.25163/angiotherapy.889771
Submitted: 29 May 2024 Revised: 26 June 2024 Published: 02 August 2024
This study showed the safety and efficacy of tubeless PCNL, showing it as a viable alternative with comparable outcomes to conventional methods.
Abstract
Background: Urinary lithiasis, or kidney stone disease, is a common and longstanding health issue characterized by significant morbidity and recurrence. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, managing large or complex renal stones continues to pose challenges. The evolution of surgical techniques, such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), has significantly impacted the management of kidney stones. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tubeless PCNL compared to conventional PCNL in patients with renal and upper ureteric stones. Methods: A prospective randomized study was conducted at the Urology and Nephrology University Hospital, Assiut University, Egypt, from September 2016 to September 2019. The study included 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned into two groups: Group 1 (conventional PCNL) and Group 2 (tubeless PCNL). Postoperative outcomes, including pain scores, fever, blood loss, urinary leakage, length of hospitalization, need for re-hospitalization, and stone-free rates, were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the final analysis, equally divided into two groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding demographic data, stone characteristics, hemoglobin levels, creatinine levels, or blood loss. However, the duration of surgery was significantly longer in the tubeless group (Group 2) compared to the conventional group (Group 1) (P-value = 0.034). Both groups achieved comparable stone-free rates with no significant differences in postoperative complications. Conclusion: Tubeless PCNL is a safe and effective alternative to conventional PCNL for managing renal and ureteral stones, with comparable outcomes in terms of blood loss, creatinine, and hemoglobin levels. The main advantage of tubeless PCNL is the potential for reduced postoperative discomfort and quicker recovery, although it requires a longer operative time. These findings support the use of tubeless PCNL as a viable option in appropriately selected patients, with implications for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs associated with kidney stone management.
Keywords: Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Renal stones, Postoperative outcomes, Surgical techniques, Kidney stone management
References
Bellman, G. C., Davidoff, R., Candela, J., Gerspach, J., Kurtz, S., & Stout, L. (1997). Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. The Journal of Urology, 157(5), 1578-1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64657-8
Choong, S. K., & Kumar, G. (2020). Preoperative assessment and patient preparation for PCNL surgery. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, 9(2), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927790490512466
Choong, S., & Kumar, V. (2020). Preoperative assessment and patient preparation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology, 34(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0841Fernström, I., & Johansson, B. (1976). Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 10(3), 257-259.
Crook, T., Lockyer, C., Keoghane, S., & Walmsley, B. (2008). A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The Journal of Urology, 180(2), 612-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.092
Fernström, I., & Johansson, B. (1976). Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: A new extraction technique. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 10(3), 257-259. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365597609182358
Ibrahim, A., Elsotohi, I., Mahjoub, S., Elatreisy, A., Soliman, K., Mabrouk, M., & Khalaf, I. (2017). Factors determining perioperative complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single center perspective. African Journal of Urology, 23(4), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2017.04.004
Iohom, G. (2006). Clinical assessment of postoperative pain. Postoperative Pain Management, 9(2), 102-108.
Istanbulluoglu, M. O., Ozturk, B., Gonen, M., Cicek, T., & Ozkardes, H. (2009). Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: A prospective randomized study. International Urology and Nephrology, 41(3), 541-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9458-0
Kader, A. K., Finelli, A., & Honey, R. J. D. (2004). Nephroureterostomy-drained percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Modification combining safety with decreased morbidity. Journal of Endourology, 18(1), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277904322700273
Khan, A., et al. (2016). Recurrence of kidney stones in patients with a history of urinary lithiasis: A prospective study. Urology Journal, 13(2), 75-80.
Khan, S. R., Pearle, M. S., Robertson, W. G., Gambaro, G., Canales, B. K., Doizi, S., Traxer, O., & Tiselius, H.-G. (2016). Kidney stones. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.64
Lojanapiwat, B., Soonthornphan, S., & Wudhikarn, S. (2004). Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. Journal of Endourology, 15(7), 711-713. https://doi.org/10.1089/0892779041890386
Patel, S. R., & Nakada, S. Y. (2015). Historical advancements in the treatment of kidney stones. World Journal of Urology, 33(3), 345-352.
Patel, S. R., & Nakada, S. Y. (2015). The modern history and evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology, 29(2), 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0516
Preminger, G. M., Assimos, D. G., Lingeman, J. E., Nakada, S. Y., Pearle, M. S., & Wolf, J. S. (2005). Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. The Journal of Urology, 173(6), 1991-2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000163977.21170.6b
Preminger, G. M., et al. (2005). AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. Journal of Urology, 173(6), 1991-2000.
Romero, V., Akpinar, H., & Assimos, D. G. (2010). Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Reviews in Urology, 12(2-3), e86-e96.
Romero, V., Akpinar, H., Smith III, J. J., & Assimos, D. G. (2010). Changing patterns in iatrogenic ureteral injuries. Reviews in Urology, 12(2), 86-96.
Shin, S. Y., et al. (2018). Epidemiology of kidney stones in the Middle East and Asia. Current Urology Reports, 19(5), 45.
Shin, S., Srivastava, A., Alli, N. A., & Bandyopadhyay, B. C. (2018). Confounding risk factors and preventative measures driving nephrolithiasis global makeup. World Journal of Nephrology, 7(7), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v7.i7.129
Srivastava, A., & Chipde, S. S. (2013). Management of 1-2 cm renal stones. Indian Journal of Urology: IJU: Journal of the Urological Society of India, 29(3), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.118852
Srivastava, A., & Chipde, S. S. (2013). Treatment strategies for renal stones: Guidelines and recommendations. Indian Journal of Urology, 29(2), 127-131.
Stables, D. P., Ginsberg, N. J., & Johnson, M. L. (1978). Percutaneous nephrostomy: A series and review of the literature. American Journal of Roentgenology, 130(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.130.1.75
View Dimensions
View Altmetric
Save
Citation
View
Share