Applied IT & Engineering

1. Introduction

The fast development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Information Technology (IT) has brought major changes to how businesses operate through new decision-making systems and improved operational workflows and modified organizational structures. Organizations achieve improved operational performance through AI systems and IT modernization initiatives which produce faster decision-making abilities and better resource allocation and innovative capabilities (Sturgeon, 2013). Organizations achieve successful results through multiple factors which include leadership guidance and strategic oversight in addition to technology implementation (Saling & D, 2020). Leaders need to develop strategic vision and ethical governance and change management skills and cross-functional collaboration abilities and data-driven decision-making skills to achieve sustainable success with AI and IT modernization projects (Sušanj et al., 2020). Study shows organizations that implement AI and IT without proper leadership experience a 3-5% drop in project efficiency which proves leadership strategic alignment with technology adoption creates measurable organizational success (Fatima et al., 2020).

Leaders with appropriate competencies successfully handle the complex operations which emerge from AI and IT modernization projects. Organizations maintain their long-term objectives through strategic vision and ethical governance enables them to reach compliance standards and maintain transparency which leads to trust and accountability in technology usage (Noordegraaf et al., 2015; Islam et al., 2023). Organizations need change management competencies to adapt effectively while fighting resistance and redesigning work processes for successful implementation. Cross-functional collaboration enables departments to exchange knowledge through their combined expertise which leads to better project results and organizations base their choices on actual current data analysis (Malik et al., 2021). Organizations that demonstrate effective leadership achieve modernization success rates which are 4% higher than average because human skills need to work together with modern technology systems (Lavoie et al., 2017). Organizations encounter multiple obstacles when they try to implement AI and IT systems because their existing infrastructure remains inadequate and their staff members lack necessary competencies and they do not provide sufficient training and their organizational structure remains disorganized and their staff members resist change which results in operational inefficiencies and stifled innovation when left unaddressed (Møller & Skedsmo, 2013; Nashid et al., 2023). Leadership competencies function as mediators which help organizations achieve successful project outcomes from their technological investments. Organizations need to focus on both strategic and operational elements which include AI application management and IT infrastructure maintenance and interdepartmental collaboration to achieve about 20% variation in adoption success (Petrella et al., 2020).

Organizations need to implement an integrated system which unites leadership with strategic planning and technological implementation to achieve lasting organizational transformation. Modernizing AI and IT systems generates tangible benefits which include faster decision-making and improved operational performance and lower costs and better resource management and decreased human errors (Nowik, 2021). The combination of Machine Learning Systems with Predictive Analytics and Natural Language Processing and Robotic Process Automation and AI-based Decision Support systems enables organizations to automate processes and generate predictive insights which results in superior service quality. The combination of these technologies with strong leadership and strategic planning leads to concrete results in productivity and operational reliability and innovation (Moos, 2011). Study shows that organizations which combine leadership skills with technological implementation succeed in achieving better performance and sustainability through efficiency improvements of about 4%. The study evaluates how leadership abilities and strategic elements influence AI and IT modernization achievements by analyzing data from 310 professionals who work in government and corporate and study organizations during 2024. The study provides practical knowledge for leaders who want to choose digital transformation predictors that will boost their organizational advantages and AI system implementation success.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Design and Approach

The study used a 2024 quantitative cross-sectional survey method to study leadership skills and strategic factors and AI technology implementation and organizational results in AI and IT modernization projects. The survey method allowed to gather fresh data about how professionals working on digital transformation projects view their field while they continue their work. The study framework combined elements from previous studies which included Strategic Vision and Ethical Governance and Change Management and Cross-Functional Collaboration and Data-Driven Decision-Making to assess their applicability in modernization settings (Xia & Li, 2022). The study examined theoretical principles and practical aspects of AI implementation and IT modernization because it focused on how leadership abilities and strategic management function as essential organizational performance factors. The study evaluated organizational advantages through indicators which included decision speed and operational efficiency and cost savings and error reduction (Barenkamp et al., 2020). The study achieves a complete understanding of organizational AI and IT modernization success elements through its multi-dimensional analysis which links leadership practices with strategic planning and technological execution.

2.2 Population and Sampling

The target population contained professionals who worked in government agencies and corporate organizations as well as study and educational institutions which handle AI and IT modernization initiatives. The practical goal-directed selection for this education to choose participants who had pertinent knowledge and involvement with digital alteration. The study included 310 participants who took part in the study in 2024. The participants included IT specialists and government officers and corporate managers. The study team included participants from different age groups yet the majority of members were between 21 and 30 years old. The team members had professional experience which divided into three main categories: less than five years and between five and ten years and more than ten years. The organization maintained a balanced representation of new employees and seasoned professionals through its stratification system. The study reached out to diverse organizational sectors through its sampling approach which allowed to collect data from multiple perspectives thus enhancing the study results generalizability. The research included various professionals who work with AI and IT modernization to study all elements that determine project success through leadership and strategic and technological factors.

2.3 Data Collection Instrument

We gathered data through a structured questionnaire which they created by combining validated scales with findings from an extensive literature review. The instrument contained multiple sections which gathered information about demographics and leadership competencies and strategic management variables and AI technology adoption and perceived organizational benefits (Nfuka & Rusu, 2013). We measured leadership competencies and benefits through a five-point Likert scale which ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to establish standardized measurements of participant responses. AI technology adoption and strategic variables were recorded as percentage-based items, allowing analysis of relative emphasis and usage across organizations (Gunter & Fitzgerald, 2013). The questionnaire underwent pretesting to verify content validity and clarity and reliability which reduced the chance of biased responses. The structured instrument allowed to collect data from 310 respondents which they could analyze through statistical methods. The study design collected both personal views about leadership value and factual data about technology implementation which allowed to study different elements that determine organizational success with AI and IT modernization (Zulu & Khosrowshahi, 2021).

2.4 Data Analysis

The gathered information underwent analysis through descriptive statistical methods and inferential statistical approaches. Descriptive statistics summarized respondent demographics, leadership competency ratings, AI technology adoption, and organizational benefits (Hernandez-De-Menendez et al., 2020; Islam & Biswas, 2023). The investigation used mean and standard deviation together with minimum and maximum values to evaluate how responses were distributed and how much they differed from each other. The study used regression analysis to identify which elements lead to AI modernization success by analyzing how leadership competencies and strategic management variables affect the outcome (Islam, 2022). The reliability of the measured constructs was evaluated through Cronbach’s Alpha which produced values between 0.79 and 0.88 (Huemann, 2010). The statistical software handled all analysis work which produced tables and figures to display results clearly. The research method enabled the researchers to find strong connections between leadership and strategy and technology implementation and organizational success which produced reliable statistical results that organizations could use for their AI and IT modernization plans (Gomes et al., 2012).

2.5 Ethical Considerations

The research followed all ethical standards which apply to survey research. The study comprised 310 members who provided their knowledgeable consent earlier the data group procedure began. The research side obvious to defend member confidentiality by choosing not to fold any categorizing personal info from the study participants. The research team delivered full study goal information to participants while showing them their right to end participation at any moment without facing any consequences (Rookwood, 2021). The data was stored safely while researchers used it only for their scientific work. The research maintained ethical standards which protected participant rights and ensured both integrity of results and trustworthiness of the study. The research methods comply with institutional approval standards for minimal-risk surveys which generate authentic results about leadership competencies and strategic variables and modernization outcomes in different organizational contexts (Mishra & Tripathi, 2021).

3.Results

3.1 Demographic Characteristics of Respondents

The study received demographic data from all 310 people who participated in the study. The sample maintains gender equilibrium because 58.4% of the participants identify as male while 41.6% identify as female. The main age group for AI and IT modernization workers consists of people between 21 and 30 years old because 52.3% of survey participants fall within this age range according to Table 1. The age group distribution shows that 30.3% of people belong to the 31–40 age range and very few individuals exist in the 50 and older category. The professional backgrounds of the participants show that IT professionals make up 40.6% of the group while government officers represent 28.4% and corporate managers form 18.1% and educators or researchers constitute 12.9%. The sample consists of people who work in different organizational positions and use various technological tools. The respondents demonstrate an even distribution of experience levels because 30.3% have under five years of experience and 39.0% fall between five and ten years and 30.6% possess experience exceeding ten years. These demographics create a representative and balanced group which serves as a basis for studying leadership skills in AI and IT modernization initiatives.

3.2 Respondents’ Ratings of Leadership Competency Importance

The respondents’ ratings of seven leadership competencies essential for AI and IT modernization projects. In Table 2 shows that all competencies received mean scores between 4.15 and 4.62 which indicates respondents value these competencies. The highest rating of 4.62 with a standard deviation of 0.51 for Strategic Technological Vision shows universal agreement about its essential role in project alignment with organizational strategy. The analysis demonstrates that organizations consider Digital Governance and Ethical Oversight as their most important value which earned a score of 4.48 with a standard deviation of 0.56 and Change Management Capability which earned a score of 4.44 with a standard deviation of 0.58. The survey respondents show diverse opinions on Data-Driven Decision-Making and Cross-Functional Collaboration because of their high standard deviations in rating (mean = 4.33, SD = 0.63) and (mean = 4.27, SD = 0.67). Survey data demonstrates that Innovation and Creativity (mean = 4.21, SD = 0.69) and Stakeholder Engagement (mean = 4.15, SD = 0.72) receive the highest variability ratings which means participants disagree about their significance. The standard deviation values indicate moderate to strong agreement among respondents which shows that all seven competencies serve as essential elements for successful leadership in modernization projects (Zhu & Zayim, 2018).

3.3 Distribution of AI Technologies Used Across Organizations

Organizations have established various AI technologies throughout their operational structures which Figure 1 illustrates. AI-Based Decision Support (19%) represents the most frequently used technology among organizations because it provides valuable assistance for strategic decision-making and operational data analysis. The following two technologies Machine Learning Systems (18.7%) and Generative AI Systems (15.4%) demonstrate increasing dependence on predictive modeling and automation and creative AI solutions for process optimization and content creation. The two most important business applications of predictive analytics and natural language processing help organizations plan with data and improve customer interactions and text analysis. Robotic Process Automation (10.3%) allows organizations to automate repetitive tasks which results in better operational efficiency and Computer Vision Tools (8.7%) serve specialized applications including quality inspection and security systems. The distribution shows organizations select AI technologies which enhance decision-making and operational efficiency and innovation but their choices differ according to their individual requirements and technological abilities (Ganichev & Koshovets, 2019).

3.4 Organizational Benefits Observed After AI Modernization

The distribution of organizational benefits observed following AI modernization, expressed in Figure 2. The analysis shows that AI implementation enables faster decision-making which leads to the highest percentage of benefits at 22%. The implementation of AI technology delivers operational efficiency improvements which represent 19% of the total benefits through better workflow management and process optimization and increased productivity. The 17% cost reduction percentage shows how automation systems and resource management solutions produce financial advantages. AI modernization delivers two main benefits to organizations through enhanced customer service satisfaction at 14.5% and improved resource allocation at 14.5% which together enable better organizational goal achievement. AI technology operates with a 13% higher rate of error reduction which results in better operational reliability and quality standards. AI modernization brings various organizational benefits which include essential faster decision-making and efficiency improvements and better operational performance through human error reduction and improved resource management (Barenkamp et al., 2020).

3.5 Strategic Variables in Managing AI and IT Modernization

The delivery of important planned variable star in management AI and IT transformation, spoken in Figure 3. Strategic Dream arises as the most dangerous flexible (25%), shiny the position of clear, forward-looking plans to leader AI and IT creativities effectively. The figure shows that Strategic Vision holds the highest value at 25% which proves organizations need clear future plans to direct their AI and IT projects successfully. The next most important factor is Ethical Governance which stands at 20% to show that organizations must establish proper oversight systems which maintain ethical standards and regulatory compliance when implementing digital transformation projects. The figure shows Managing AI (18%) and Managing IT (15%) as essential operational elements which prove these components play vital roles in deploying AI systems and safeguarding IT systems. The percentage of 12% for Change Management demonstrates that organizations need established systems to handle organizational changes during modernization processes. The last element shows Cross-Functional Collaboration (10%) which demonstrates that different departments need to work together by sharing knowledge and collaborating on projects to reach success but at a lower level. The distribution helps organizations identify which strategic and operational factors need their attention to achieve successful AI and IT modernization (Koca et al., 2009).

3.6 Regression Predictors of AI Modernization Success with Reliability

The regression analysis provided results for AI modernization success predictors together with the reliability scores (Cronbach’s Alpha, a) for each variable. The data shows Strategic Vision produces the most substantial positive effect on AI modernization success (ß = 0.352, p = 0.042) which demonstrates that organizations need strategic planning to direct their AI projects (see Table 3). The analysis reveals that Ethical Governance functions as a positive predictor (ß = 0.278, p = 0.048) which indicates organizations need transparent oversight systems to display ethical conduct. Change Management shows a moderate impact (ß = 0.241, p = 0.056), suggesting that structured approaches to organizational adaptation are essential but slightly less influential. The effects of Collaboration (ß = 0.194, p = 0.062) and Data-Driven Decision-Making (ß = 0.167, p = 0.071) show marginal significance which suggests that cross-functional teamwork together with data-based approaches lead to modernization success yet their impact remains limited. All variables demonstrate acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s Alpha values ranging from 0.79 to 0.88, confirming the reliability of the measured constructs.

4. Discussion

The study analyzes leadership abilities and strategic elements together with AI technology implementation and organizational advantages within AI and IT modernization efforts. The demographic profile of the 310 respondents demonstrates a representative sample of professionals engaged in digital transformation initiatives. The sample included 58.4% males and 41.6% females with most participants (52.3%) between 21 and 30 years’ old which indicates a workforce that consists mostly of young digital natives. The group consisted of IT professionals at 40.6% as the main segment followed by government officers at 28.4% and corporate managers at 18.1% and educators/researchers at 12.9%. The professional experience of participants showed a balanced distribution because 39.0% of them had five to ten years of work experience which indicates an equal number of new and experienced professionals working on AI and IT projects (Torrance & Forde, 2016). The survey results show that all seven leadership competencies hold equal importance for achieving successful modernization based on Table 2. The highest average rating for Strategic Technological Vision (4.62, SD = 0.51) shows organizations should focus on linking AI and IT projects to their strategic plans. Organizations received their highest ratings in Digital Governance and Ethical Oversight with a mean score of 4.48 and a standard deviation of 0.56 as well as for Change Management Capability with a mean of 4.44 and standard deviation of 0.58 because they require ethical standards to guide their technological progress. The distribution of resources among organizational unit’s changes according to business environments for Cross-Functional Collaboration (4.33, SD = 0.63) and Data-Driven Decision-Making (4.27, SD = 0.67) and Innovation and Creativity (4.21, SD = 0.69) and Stakeholder Engagement. The study results demonstrate that leaders need to use strategic thinking with ethical conduct and adaptable abilities for successful modernization project leadership (Park, 2017).

The AI technology distribution chart shows organizations use AI-Based Decision Support (19%) and Machine Learning Systems (18.7%) most frequently because these technologies improve decision-making processes and operational efficiency through predictive analytics. The data shows that Generative AI Systems (15.4%) and Predictive Analytics (16.1%) are becoming more common in automated processes and data-based planning and creative problem-solving activities. Less frequently adopted technologies, including Natural Language Processing (11.8%), Robotic Process Automation (10.3%), and Computer Vision Tools (8.7%), indicate targeted applications based on specific organizational needs. AI modernization delivers organizational advantages through two main benefits which include faster decision-making (22%) and enhanced operational efficiency (19%) along with cost savings and better customer satisfaction and optimized resource usage and decreased human mistakes. The research findings reveal that AI modernization produces dual value for organizations through operational and strategic benefits which enhance both workflow efficiency and service quality and reliability (Park, 2017).

The strategic variables which control AI and IT modernization demonstrate that Strategic Vision (25%) and Ethical Governance (20%) serve as the core elements before Managing AI (18%) and Managing IT (15%) and Change Management (12%) and Cross-Functional Collaboration (10%). The results from that Strategic Vision (ß = 0.352, p = 0.042) and Ethical Governance (ß = 0.278, p = 0.048) function as the main determinants for AI modernization success but Change Management and Collaboration and Data-Driven Decision-Making have lower impact levels. The measurements show reliable constructs because Cronbach’s Alpha values range from 0.79 to 0.88. The research shows that organizations need strategic leadership and ethical oversight and operational management of AI and IT resources to reach successful modernization results (Chatterjee et al., 2019; Wolford, 2019). Organizations that focus on these elements achieve better decision speed and operational efficiency and resource management which proves that leadership and technology implementation and organizational performance share an essential connection during AI and IT transformation (Calderaro & Blumfelde, 2022).

5. Conclusion

The study shows that AI and IT modernization success depends on strategic leadership working together with ethical governance and operational management. The analysis revealed that Strategic Vision and Ethical Governance operated as fundamental elements which determine modernization success rates whereas Change Management and Collaboration and Data-Driven Decision-Making proved to be secondary factors. AI technologies including Decision Support and Machine Learning Systems have improved decision-making speed and operational efficiency and resource management capabilities. The implementation success demands leadership competencies which include Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement and Cross-Functional Collaboration.

Author Contributions

K.M.H. designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and prepared the initial manuscript draft.
M.R.H. contributed to research materials, background review, data validation, and manuscript editing.
All authors approved the final manuscript.

References

Barenkamp, M., Rebstadt, J., & Thomas, O. (2020). Applications of AI in classical software engineering. AI Perspectives, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42467-020-00005-4

Calderaro, A., & Blumfelde, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and EU security: the false promise of digital sovereignty. European Security, 31(3), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101885

Chatterjee, S., Ghosh, S., & Chaudhuri, R. (2019). Adoption of Ubiquitous Customer Relationship Management (UCRM) in enterprise: leadership support and technological competence as moderators. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 19(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2019.1664870

Fatima, S., Desouza, K. C., & Dawson, G. S. (2020). National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 67, 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.07.008

Ganichev, N. A., & Koshovets, O. B. (2019). Integrating Russia into the Global Project of Digital Transformation: Opportunities, Problems and Risks. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 30(6), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1075700719060030

Gomes, C. F., Yasin, M. M., & Small, M. H. (2012). Discerning Interrelationships among the Knowledge, Competencies, and Roles of Project Managers in the Planning and Implementation of Public Sector Projects. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(5), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.655461

Gunter, H. M., & Fitzgerald, T. (2013). New Public Management and the modernisation of education systems 1. Journal of Educational Administration & History, 45(3), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.796914

Hernandez-De-Menendez, M., Díaz, C. a. E., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: a review. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00672-x

Huemann, M. (2010). Considering Human Resource Management when developing a project-oriented company: Case study of a telecommunication company. International Journal of Project Management, 28(4), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.008

Islam, S. N. (2022). "The Integration of AI in Advancing Electrical and Electronics Engineering", Journal of Primeasia, 3(1),1-11,10336 https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.3110336

Islam, S. N., Biswas, A. (2023). "Artificial Intelligence for Critical Power Infrastructure: Challenges and Opportunities", Applied IT & Engineering, 1(1),1-9,10397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1680541

Islam, S. N., Biswas, A., Chowdhury, A. K. (2023). "AI-Enabled Cyber-Physical Power Systems: Review of Smart Grid Security, Optimization, and Decision Support", Applied IT & Engineering, 1(1),1-9,10396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1680541

Koca, C., Arslan, B., & Asçi, F. H. (2009). Attitudes towards Women’s Work Roles and Women Managers in a Sports Organization: The Case of Turkey. Gender Work and Organization, 18(6), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00490.x

Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Aubry, M., Cyr, G., Richer, M., Fortin-Verreault, J., Fortin, C., & Marchionni, C. (2017). Innovation in health service management: Adoption of project management offices to support major health care transformation. Journal of Nursing Management, 25(8), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12505

Malik, A., Budhwar, P., Patel, C., & Laker, B. (2021). Holistic indigenous and atomistic modernity: Analyzing performance management in two Indian emerging market multinational corporations. Human Resource Management, 60(5), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22057

Mishra, S., & Tripathi, A. R. (2021). AI business model: an integrative business approach. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00157-5

Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernising education: New Public Management reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration & History, 45(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.822353

Moos, L. (2011). Educating Danish school leaders to meet new expectations? School Leadership and Management, 31(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.560600

Nashid, S., Papia, S. K., Chowdhury, N., Mia, M. S., Hossain, M. I. (2023). "Advanced Business Analytics in Healthcare Enhancing Clinical Decision Support and Operational Efficiency", Business and Social Sciences, 1(1),1-8,10345. https://doi.org/10.25163/business.1110345

Nfuka, E. N., & Rusu, L. (2013). Critical Success Framework for Implementing Effective IT Governance in Tanzanian Public Sector Organizations. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 16(3), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198x.2013.10845642

Noordegraaf, M., Schneider, M. M. E., Van Rensen, E. L. J., & Boselie, J. P. P. E. F. (2015). Cultural Complementarity: Reshaping professional and organizational logics in developing frontline medical leadership. Public Management Review, 18(8), 1111–1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1066416

Nowik, P. (2021). Electronic personhood for artificial intelligence in the workplace. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 105584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105584

Park, S. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and implications for innovative cluster policies. AI & Society, 33(3), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0777-5

Petrella, S., Miller, C., & Cooper, B. (2020). Russia’s artificial intelligence strategy: the role of State-Owned Firms. Orbis, 65(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2020.11.004

Rookwood, J. (2021). From sport-for-development to sports mega-events: conflict, authoritarian modernisation and statecraft in Azerbaijan. Sport in Society, 25(4), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2021.2019710

Saling, K. C., & D, M., DO. (2020). Leveraging people analytics for an adaptive complex talent management system. Procedia Computer Science, 168, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.269

Sturgeon, J. C. (2013). Cross-border rubber cultivation between China and Laos: Regionalization by Akha and Tai rubber farmers. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12014

Sušanj, Z., Jakopec, A., & Ðoric, A. (2020). Academics’ effectiveness and professional development in Croatia: Challenges for human resource management in higher education institutions. European Journal of Education, 55(4), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12422

Torrance, D., & Forde, C. (2016). Redefining what it means to be a teacher through professional standards: implications for continuing teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1246527

Wolford, W. (2019). The colonial roots of agricultural modernization in Mozambique: the role of research from Portugal to ProSavana. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1680541

Xia, X., & Li, X. (2022). [Retracted] Artificial intelligence for higher education development and teaching skills. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7614337

Zhu, C., & Zayim-Kurtay, M. (2018). University governance and academic leadership: perceptions of European and Chinese university staff and perceived need for capacity building. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1458636

Zulu, S. L., & Khosrowshahi, F. (2021). A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 39(7), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1930080