Advances in Herbal Research | online ISSN 2209-1890
RESEARCH ARTICLE   (Open Access)

Interconnected Flora: Understanding Plant Communication and Behavior Through Chemical Signaling, Electrical Signaling, And Root Network Interactions in Ecosystems

Ahmed Saad 1*

+ Author Affiliations

Australian Herbal Insight 2(1) 1-5 https://doi.org/10.25163/ahi.219913

Submitted: 03 September 2019  Revised: 18 November 2019  Published: 20 November 2019 

Abstract

Background: The study of plant communication and behavior has revealed intricate mechanisms by which plants interact with their environment and neighboring organisms. Plants have evolved complex signaling systems, including chemical, electrical, and root-based communication pathways, to adapt and thrive in dynamic ecosystems. Methods: We conducted an extensive review of the literature, examining experimental studies on plant signaling mechanisms such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) release, electrical signal transmission, and mycorrhizal network interactions. A meta-analysis of findings from field and laboratory studies provided insight into the adaptive functions of these behaviors. Results: Our findings indicate that plants use VOCs to warn neighboring plants of herbivore attacks. Electrical signaling was observed to mediate responses to environmental stimuli, such as light and mechanical stress. Mycorrhizal networks facilitate resource sharing and defense signaling across plant communities. These mechanisms collectively enhance plant survival and ecological fitness. Conclusion: Plant communication is multifaceted, involving chemical, electrical, and root-based networks that contribute to survival strategies. Understanding these interactions enriches our knowledge of ecosystem dynamics and has potential applications in agriculture and conservation.

Keywords: Innovation, Sustainability, Efficiency, Collaboration, Growth

References

Baldwin, I. T., & Schultz, J. C. (1983). Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: Evidence for communication between plants. Science, 221(4607), 277-279. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.221.4607.277

Baluska, F., & Mancuso, S. (2009). Plant neurobiology: From sensory biology, via plant communication, to social plant behavior. Cognitive Processing, 10(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-008-0239-6

Barto, E. K., Weidenhamer, J. D., Cipollini, D., & Rillig, M. C. (2012). Fungal superhighways: Do common mycorrhizal networks enhance below ground communication? Trends in Plant Science, 17(11), 633-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.06.007

Dicke, M., & Baldwin, I. T. (2010). The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: Beyond the 'cry for help'. Trends in Plant Science, 15(3), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.002

Dudley, S. A., & File, A. L. (2007). Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biology Letters, 3(4), 435-438. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0232

Farmer, E. E., Gasperini, D., & Acosta, I. F. (2014). The squeeze cell hypothesis for the activation of jasmonate synthesis in response to wounding. New Phytologist, 204(2), 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12897

Fromm, J., & Lautner, S. (2007). Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 30(3), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01614.x

Gagliano, M., Mancuso, S., & Robert, D. (2012). Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends in Plant Science, 17(6), 323-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.002

Heil, M., & Karban, R. (2010). Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(3), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.09.010

Karban, R. (2008). Plant behaviour and communication. Ecology Letters, 11(7), 727-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01183.x

Karban, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (1997). Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226424972.001.0001

Karban, R., Shiojiri, K., Ishizaki, S., Wetzel, W. C., & Evans, R. Y. (2013). Kin recognition affects plant communication and defence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1756), 20123062. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3062

Karban, R., Yang, L. H., & Edwards, K. F. (2014). Volatile communication between plants that affects herbivory: A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 17(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12205

Kessler, A., & Baldwin, I. T. (2001). Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science, 291(5511), 2141-2144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5511.2141

Maffei, M. E., Mithöfer, A., & Boland, W. (2007). Before gene expression: Early events in plant-insect interaction. Trends in Plant Science, 12(7), 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.001

Pare, P. W., & Tumlinson, J. H. (1999). Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiology, 121(2), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.2.325

Peñuelas, J., & Staudt, M. (2010). BVOCs and global change. Trends in Plant Science, 15(3), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.005

Pineda, A., Dicke, M., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Poelman, E. H. (2013). Plant-mediated interactions between above-and below-ground communities at higher trophic levels. Trends in Plant Science, 18(11), 600-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01773.x

Selosse, M. A., Richard, F., He, X., & Simard, S. W. (2006). Mycorrhizal networks: Des liaisons dangereuses? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(11), 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.003

Simard, S. W., Perry, D. A., Jones, M. D., Myrold, D. D., Durall, D. M., & Molina, R. (1997). Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature, 388(6642), 579-582. https://doi.org/10.1038/41557

Song, Y. Y., Zeng, R. S., Xu, J. F., Li, J., Shen, X., & Yihdego, W. G. (2010). Interplant communication of tomato plants through underground common mycorrhizal networks. PLoS One, 5(10), e13324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013324

Trewavas, A. (2005). Plant intelligence. Naturwissenschaften, 92(9), 401-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0014-9

Turlings, T. C. J., & Wäckers, F. L. (2004). Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-injured plants. In R. T. Cardé & J. G. Millar (Eds.), Advances in insect chemical ecology (pp. 21-75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542664.003

Van der Heijden, M. G., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M. A., & Sanders, I. R. (2015). Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: The past, the present, and the future. New Phytologist, 205(4), 1406-1423. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13288

Zimmermann, M. R., & Mithöfer, A. (2013). Electrical long-distance signaling in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 8(8), e24126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36470-9_15

PDF
Full Text
Export Citation

View Dimensions


View Plumx



View Altmetric



2
Save
0
Citation
146
View
0
Share