Microbial Bioactives

Microbial Bioactives | Online ISSN 2209-2161
362
Citations
214.3k
Views
181
Articles
Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better
Switch to the new experience
Figures and Tables
EDITORIAL   (Open Access)

The Exploitation of Microbes: Next Generation Global Solution 

Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir a and Md. Mozammel Hoq b*

+ Author Affiliations

Microbial Bioactives 3 (1) 106-109 https://doi.org/10.25163/microbbioacts.31001E2313150520

Submitted: 23 July 2019 Revised: 16 May 2020  Published: 18 May 2020 


Abstract

Microorganisms, though microscopic, hold immense potential to influence and transform nearly every sphere of life when utilized appropriately. Nature operates as a complex and dynamic system where interactions among biotic and abiotic components shape ecological balance, sometimes with delayed and unintended consequences (Dimkpa et al., 2009; Meier et al., 2010). Over time, many technological and industrial advances have led to significant global challenges, including antibiotic resistance, environmental pollution, bioaccumulation, and ecosystem disruption (MacGowan & Macnaughton, 2017; “Progress on antibiotic resistance,” 2018). These issues are further intensified by climate change and anthropogenic pressures, affecting health, agriculture, and environmental sustainability worldwide (Bellard et al., 2012; Hoegh-Guldberg & Bruno, 2010). In response, integrated and interdisciplinary approaches are increasingly being adopted, with microbial biotechnology emerging as a promising solution. Microorganisms possess unique attributes such as metabolic diversity, rapid growth, adaptability, and the ability to produce valuable bioactive compounds, making them essential tools in medicine, agriculture, industry, and environmental remediation (Ahmad et al., 2011; Claassens et al., 2016). Despite these advantages, developing countries remain underutilized in harnessing microbial potential. Therefore, strategic investment, technological integration, and policy-driven initiatives are crucial to promote sustainable, microbe-based innovations that can address global challenges while supporting economic growth and ecological resilience.

Keywords: Microbial technology; Natural process; Artefacts; Ecofriendly solutions.

Editorial

Nature is a dynamic and complex system of continuous interactions among numerous biotic and abiotic components and the impacts of these interactions are sometimes perceived readily and sometimes at late (Dimkpa, Weinand, & Asch, 2009; Meier et al., 2010). A good number of discoveries and inventions in medicine, agriculture or industry once renowned as very useful, turned into non-disposable problems. Of note, antibiotic resistance, carcinogenesis, pesticide resistance and adverse health effects, environmental pollution, disturbance of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, bioaccumulation and biomagnification, eutrophication, recalcitrance etc. and their chronic deleterious effects are few of the problems the world is facing and suffering continuously (Barai et al., 2017; Bonning, 2014; MacGowan & Macnaughton, 2017; Patricia Hernandez-Mart´inez, Juan Ferre, & Escriche, 2009; “Progress on antibiotic resistance,” 2018; Shishir et al., 2014). In addition, the climatic and anthropogenic changes are bringing about adverse effects on the environment, agriculture and health globally (Bellard, Bertelsmeier, Leadley, Thuiller, & Courchamp, 2012; Hoegh-Guldberg & Bruno, 2010; Potter, Arthur Woods, & Pincebourde, 2013; Taylor et al., 2013).

In solving these problems, holistic approaches coordinating sophisticated and state-of-the-art technologies from physical, chemical, computational and life sciences are being adopted. The developed countries have taken the advantages of recent maturation of technology in such cases especially with microbial biotechnology whereas the developing and least developed countries are still struggling and lagging behind miles (Ahasan & Partanen, 2001; Kleinman, 2010; Lustick & Zaman, 2011; Pickett, 2001). With the advent of  sophisticated neoteric technologies and abstruse understandings in life science, even the very tiny life-threatening portion of the total microbial world was transformed into the ‘Goldmines’ (Ahmad, Khan, Aqil, & Singh, 2011; Barkay & Schaefer, 2001; Dewapriya & Kim, 2014; Mandal, Bolander, Mukhopadhyay, Sarkar, & Mukherjee, 2006; J. N. S, Srinivasan, & Devi, 2011; Vigneshvar, Sudhakumari, Senthilkumaran, & Prakash, 2016). Microbes being harnessed by appropriate molecular techniques are the keys to this magic that took place in the last century. Due to the numerous exquisite attributes such as ubiquity and diversity, the ability of fast multiplication and adaptation, synthesis of diverse useful metabolites and biomolecules, the decomposing ability of diverse biological and chemical wastes, compatibility in genetic modification, the feasibility of industrial production and purification, and eco-friendly in nature, microorganisms were exploited successfully in diverse beneficial sectors and a lot more are still to come (Bakker, Manter, Sheflin, Weir, & Vivanco, 2012; Claassens, Sousa, Dos Santos, De Vos, & Van Der Oost, 2016; Löffler & Edwards, 2006; Santero, Floriano, & Govantes, 2016; Tender et al., 2002; Toribio-Mateas, 2018).

Since exploitation of the already established potentials of tiny microbes is yet to be attained at a minimum level by the developing and underdeveloped countries, sincere attention, appropriate planning and priority-based initiatives should be into these sectors. Developing and incorporating microbe based eco-friendly processes and agents in agriculture, health, environment, industry and so on would be the key in eradicating various nuisances and simultaneously boosting up the economy. The scopes are usually broad, and the working areas should be prioritized based on the countries’ current as well as prognostic situations.

Countries dependent on agriculture should have a special focus on eco-friendly cultivation techniques with bio-fertilizer, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, bio-intensive crop protectants such as bio-pesticides, bio-herbicides, bio-fungicides and bacteriocins etc. Again, waste management involving biotransformation and bioconversion would facilitate the production of biofuel, biogas, compost. Frequent use of antibiotics in livestock, poultry and aquaculture should be replaced using efficient and indigenous probiotic organisms to minimize the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Often, the industries in these countries are the major sources of toxic chemical release due to the lack or inefficient effluent treatment plants (ETP). This problem should be solved pragmatically by incorporating heavy metal accumulating and degrading microorganisms (Gadd, 1990; Ilias, Rafiqullah, Debnath, Mannan, & Mozammel Hoq, 2011) besides arranging required infrastructure in their facilities. Leather and textile industries, mostly situated in these countries, should involve microbe derived eco-friendly agents in different treatment steps of leathers and fabrics so that the environment, biodiversity and the public health are not at risk with harsh chemicals. Such agents are especially safer for their biodegradability and specificity and their synthesis is possible simply through the fermentation process. Therefore, screening, identification and characterization of potential microbes and developing bioprocess to produce them in large scale, should be prioritized for better management of the mentioned courses and strengthening the economy.

The pharmaceuticals are also leaning towards microbial world substituting the natural sources like plants, herbs or animals which have long been used in obtaining essential active ingredients. The limitations in productivity and recovery of active ingredients were solved with the appearance of recombinant DNA technology. Microbes are now being used as a unique biocatalyst for industrial-level production of useful metabolites. The compatibility of mass production of microbes in lesser space than that of plants and animals, functioning ability at mild temperature and pressure (thus saving energy), richness in diverse genes’ pool that offer unlimited synthetic and degradative potentials and functioning as a suitable host for foreign genes etc. conferred them with tremendous advantages over the plants and animals (Bushell, 2003; Demain, 2014; Grossel, 1994; Hoq et al., 2013; Pandey, Soccol, Nigam, & Soccol, 2000; Patra, Das, & Shin, 2018; Sabra, Dietz, Tjahjasari, & Zeng, 2010).Thus the growing demand for pharmaceutical products was met by the scientists exploiting microorganisms and many lifesaving drugs were developed, used and improved gradually. In succession, diverse bioactive compounds with antibacterial, antifungal, anti-viral, anti-algal, antioxidant, antifouling, anti-cancer and enzymatic activities were discovered and utilized in relevant sectors (Bérdy, 2005; Ferdous, Shishir, Khan, & Hoq, 2018; Meena, Sharma, & Kanwar, 2017; J. S & Bharathi, 2018). In recent years, the successful discovery of novel bioactive compounds, especially from bacteria and fungi, has been attributed to the rapid development in advanced genetics, bioinformatics and computational biology, albeit with certain limitations in clinical and field trials (Adams & Weiner, 2005; Biankin, Piantadosi, & Hollingsworth, 2015; Demain, 2014; Fink & Shaw Warren, 2014; van Belkum et al., 2018; Wackett, 2017; Watkins, Stanton, Ryan, & Ross, 2017). Developing countries can take the advantages of such traits of microbes, especially in their pharmaceutical sectors.

The tiny microbes with appropriate use would become the key components of every sphere of life. Hence, tremendous concerted efforts are required to utilize such a valuable resource that could be obtained from every inch of the world.

Author contribution

MAS composed the manuscript. MMH broached the idea and directed in the composition of the manuscript and did the meticulous revision.

Competing Interests

Authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.

References


Adams GP, Weiner LM. Monoclonal antibody therapy of cancer. Nature Biotechnology. 2005;23(9):1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1137.

Ahasan MR, Partanen T. Occupational health and safety in the least developed countries: a simple case of neglect. Journal of Epidemiology. 2001;11(2):74–80. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.11.74.

Ahmad I, Khan MSA, Aqil F, Singh M. Microbial applications in agriculture and the environment: a broad perspective. In: Ahmad I, Ahmad F, Pichtel J, editors. Microbes and Microbial Technology: Agricultural and Environmental Applications. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7931-5_1.

Bakker MG, Manter DK, Sheflin AM, Weir TL, Vivanco JM. Harnessing the rhizosphere microbiome through plant breeding and agricultural management. Plant and Soil. 2012;360:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1361-x.

Barai L, Saha MR, Rahman T, Khandaker T, Dutta S, Hasan R, Haq JA. Antibiotic resistance: situation analysis in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Medicine. 2017;34:15–19.
Barkay T, Schaefer J. Metal and radionuclide bioremediation: issues, considerations and potentials. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2001;4(3):318–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00210-1.

Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters. 2012;15(4):365–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x.

Bérdy J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2005;58(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2005.1.

Bérdy J. Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2012;65:385–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2012.27.
Biankin AV, Piantadosi S, Hollingsworth SJ. Patient-centric trials for therapeutic development in precision oncology. Nature. 2015;526(7573):361–370. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15819.

Bonning BC. Bt toxin modification for enhanced efficacy. Toxins. 2014;6(10):3005–3027. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6103005.

Bushell M. Manual of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2003.
Claassens NJ, Sousa DZ, dos Santos VAPM, de Vos WM, van der Oost J. Harnessing the power of microbial autotrophy. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2016;14:692–706. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.130.

Demain AL. Importance of microbial natural products and the need to revitalize their discovery. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 2014;41(2):185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-013-1325-z.

Dewapriya P, Kim S. Marine microorganisms: an emerging avenue in modern nutraceuticals and functional foods. Food Research International. 2014;56:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.12.022.

Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F. Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2009;32(12):1682–1694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x.

Ferdous UT, Shishir MA, Khan SN, Hoq MM. Bacillus spp.: attractive sources of anti-cancer and anti-proliferative biomolecules. Microbial Bioactives. 2018;1(1):E033–E045. https://doi.org/10.25163/microbbioacts.11005B0408130818.

Fink MP, Warren HS. Strategies to improve drug development for sepsis. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2014;13:741–758. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4368.

Gadd GM. Heavy metal accumulation by bacteria and other microorganisms. Experientia. 1990;46(8):834–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935534.

Grossel SS. Safety in industrial microbiology and biotechnology. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 1994;7(2):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4230(94)80080-4.
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF. The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science. 2010;328(5985):1523–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189930.

Hoq MM, Mamun A Al, Shishir MA, Akand NR, Khan M, Khan SN. Bioprocess development for eco-friendly microbial products and its impacts on bio-industry establishment in Bangladesh. In: International Conference on Biotechnology. Vol. 1. Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2013:205–217. Available from: http://www.caresbd.org/uploads/book1_14.pdf.

Ilias M, Rafiqullah IM, Debnath BC, Mannan KSB, Mozammel Hoq M. Isolation and characterization of chromium(VI)-reducing bacteria from tannery effluents. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2011;51(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0095-4.

Kleinman A. Four social theories for global health. The Lancet. 2010;375(9725):1518–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60646-0.

Löffler FE, Edwards EA. Harnessing microbial activities for environmental cleanup. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2006;17(3):274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.001.

Lustick DR, Zaman MH. Biomedical engineering education and practice: challenges and opportunities in improving health in developing countries. In: 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy. IEEE; 2011. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSIP.2011.6064477.

MacGowan A, Macnaughton E. Antibiotic resistance. Medicine. 2017;45(10):622–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2017.07.006.

Mahlapuu M, Håkansson J, Ringstad L, Björn C. Antimicrobial peptides: an emerging category of therapeutic agents. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2016;6:194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00194.

Mandal D, Bolander ME, Mukhopadhyay D, Sarkar G, Mukherjee P. The use of microorganisms for the formation of metal nanoparticles and their application. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006;69:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0179-3.

Meena KR, Sharma A, Kanwar SS. Microbial lipopeptides and their medical applications. Annals of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics. 2017;2(21):1–5.
Meier ES, Kienast F, Pearman PB, Svenning JC, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, et al. Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions. Ecography. 2010;33(6):1038–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06229.x.

Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT. Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: Sugarcane bagasse. Bioresource Technology. 2000;74(1):69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00142-X.

Patra JK, Das G, Shin HS, editors. Microbial Biotechnology. Singapore: Springer; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7140-9.

Hernández-Martínez P, Ferré J, Escriche B. Broad-spectrum cross-resistance in Spodoptera exigua from selection with a marginally toxic Cry protein. Pest Management Science. 2009;65(6):645–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1725.

Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2001;55(2):111–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.2.111.

Potter KA, Woods HA, Pincebourde S. Microclimatic challenges in global change biology. Global Change Biology. 2013;19(10):2932–2939. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12257.

Progress on antibiotic resistance. Nature. 2018;562(7727):307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07031-7.

J S, Bharathi V. Bioactive potential from marine sponge Callyspongia diffusa-associated Pseudomonas fluorescens BCPBMS-1 and Penicillium citrinum. Microbial Bioactives. 2018;1(1):8–13.
J N S, Srinivasan VM, Devi CS. Novel anti-cancer compounds from marine actinomycetes: a review. Industrial Biotechnology. 2011.
Sabra W, Dietz D, Tjahjasari D, Zeng AP. Biosystems analysis and engineering of microbial consortia for industrial biotechnology. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2010;10(5):407–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201000111.

Santero E, Floriano B, Govantes F. Harnessing the power of microbial metabolism. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2016;31:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.003.

Shishir A, Roy A, Islam N, Rahman A, Khan SN, Hoq MM. Abundance and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in Bangladesh and their cry genes profile. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2014;2:20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00020.

Taylor RG, Scanlon B, Döll P, Rodell M, van Beek R, Wada Y, et al. Groundwater and climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2013;3:322–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744.

Tender LM, Reimers CE, Stecher HA, Holmes DE, Bond DR, Lowy DA, et al. Harnessing microbially generated power on the seafloor. Nature Biotechnology. 2002;20(8):821–825. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt716.

Toribio-Mateas M. Harnessing the power of microbiome assessment tools as part of neuroprotective nutrition and lifestyle medicine interventions. Microorganisms. 2018;6(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020035.

van Belkum A, Bachmann TT, Lüdke G, Lisby JG, Kahlmeter G, Mohess A, et al. Developmental roadmap for antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2018;17:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0098-9.

Vigneshvar S, Sudhakumari CC, Senthilkumaran B, Prakash H. Recent advances in biosensor technology for potential applications: an overview. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2016;4:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00011.

Wackett LP. Microbial therapeutics. Microbial Biotechnology. 2017;10(3):666–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12724.

Watkins C, Stanton C, Ryan CA, Ross RP. Microbial therapeutics designed for infant health. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2017;4:48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2017.00048.


Article metrics
View details
0
Downloads
0
Citations
2596
Views
📖 Cite article

View Dimensions


View Plumx


View Altmetric



0
Save
0
Citation
2596
View
0
Share